Cargando…

Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles

The impact of effective parameters such as iron oxide nanoparticles dosage, contact time and solution pH was optimized for removal of Ag(I) and Ni(II) in the nuclear cooling system and the best conditions were compared. Nearly complete removal (97%) of Ni(II) and Ag(I) were obtained at adsorbent dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salmani, Mohammad Hossein, Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan, Aboueian -Jahromi, Mohaddeseh, Askarishahi, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24499654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-11-21
_version_ 1782336607343345664
author Salmani, Mohammad Hossein
Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan
Aboueian -Jahromi, Mohaddeseh
Askarishahi, Mohsen
author_facet Salmani, Mohammad Hossein
Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan
Aboueian -Jahromi, Mohaddeseh
Askarishahi, Mohsen
author_sort Salmani, Mohammad Hossein
collection PubMed
description The impact of effective parameters such as iron oxide nanoparticles dosage, contact time and solution pH was optimized for removal of Ag(I) and Ni(II) in the nuclear cooling system and the best conditions were compared. Nearly complete removal (97%) of Ni(II) and Ag(I) were obtained at adsorbent dosage of 40 and 20 g/L, respectively. Experiments showed that 4 hours was a good choice as optimum contact time for two ions removal. The effective parameter was pH, so that maximum removal efficiency was obtained for Ag(I) in acidic pH=3 and for Ni(II) in basic pH=10. It seems that removal of Ag(I) was controlled by adsorption-reduction mechanism, but Ni(II) could place only adsorption. Langmuir and Freundlich model was more suitable for nickel and silver removal by this adsorbent, respectively. Ag(I) and Ni(II) removal efficiency trend by this adsorbent is similar at periods but different in the concentrations, pHs and equilibrium model. The obtained results were very promising, as both Ag(I) and Ni(II) were effectively removed from synthetic wastewater and there was a possibility to remove Ag(I) very fast. Hence, the idea of using nanoparticles for application of metal ions removal from wastewaters seems to be very efficient and quite promising.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4176308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41763082014-10-23 Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles Salmani, Mohammad Hossein Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan Aboueian -Jahromi, Mohaddeseh Askarishahi, Mohsen J Environ Health Sci Eng Research Article The impact of effective parameters such as iron oxide nanoparticles dosage, contact time and solution pH was optimized for removal of Ag(I) and Ni(II) in the nuclear cooling system and the best conditions were compared. Nearly complete removal (97%) of Ni(II) and Ag(I) were obtained at adsorbent dosage of 40 and 20 g/L, respectively. Experiments showed that 4 hours was a good choice as optimum contact time for two ions removal. The effective parameter was pH, so that maximum removal efficiency was obtained for Ag(I) in acidic pH=3 and for Ni(II) in basic pH=10. It seems that removal of Ag(I) was controlled by adsorption-reduction mechanism, but Ni(II) could place only adsorption. Langmuir and Freundlich model was more suitable for nickel and silver removal by this adsorbent, respectively. Ag(I) and Ni(II) removal efficiency trend by this adsorbent is similar at periods but different in the concentrations, pHs and equilibrium model. The obtained results were very promising, as both Ag(I) and Ni(II) were effectively removed from synthetic wastewater and there was a possibility to remove Ag(I) very fast. Hence, the idea of using nanoparticles for application of metal ions removal from wastewaters seems to be very efficient and quite promising. BioMed Central 2013-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4176308/ /pubmed/24499654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-11-21 Text en Copyright © 2013 Salmani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salmani, Mohammad Hossein
Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan
Aboueian -Jahromi, Mohaddeseh
Askarishahi, Mohsen
Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
title Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
title_full Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
title_fullStr Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
title_short Comparison between Ag (I) and Ni (II) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
title_sort comparison between ag (i) and ni (ii) removal from synthetic nuclear power plant coolant water by iron oxide nanoparticles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24499654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-11-21
work_keys_str_mv AT salmanimohammadhossein comparisonbetweenagiandniiiremovalfromsyntheticnuclearpowerplantcoolantwaterbyironoxidenanoparticles
AT ehrampoushmohammadhassan comparisonbetweenagiandniiiremovalfromsyntheticnuclearpowerplantcoolantwaterbyironoxidenanoparticles
AT aboueianjahromimohaddeseh comparisonbetweenagiandniiiremovalfromsyntheticnuclearpowerplantcoolantwaterbyironoxidenanoparticles
AT askarishahimohsen comparisonbetweenagiandniiiremovalfromsyntheticnuclearpowerplantcoolantwaterbyironoxidenanoparticles