Cargando…

Change in the pulp chamber temperature with different stripping techniques

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in pulp chamber temperature during the stripping technique. METHODS: Seventy-eight proximal surfaces of 39 extracted human teeth were stripped by two techniques: double-sided perforated stripping disk (PSD) and handheld stripper (HS). The t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, José Carlos d’Ornellas, Weissheimer, André, de Menezes, Luciane Macedo, de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli Santayana, Mezomo, Maurício
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0055-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in pulp chamber temperature during the stripping technique. METHODS: Seventy-eight proximal surfaces of 39 extracted human teeth were stripped by two techniques: double-sided perforated stripping disk (PSD) and handheld stripper (HS). The teeth were divided into three groups: incisors (group 1), premolars (2), and molars (3). A J type thermocouple was inserted into the pulp chamber for temperature evaluation during the stripping procedure. RESULTS: Temperature rise was observed in all groups. The average temperature increase for the incisors was 2.58°C (±0.27°C) with PSD and 1.24°C (±0.3°C) with HS; for the premolars, 2.64°C (±0.29°C) with PSD and 0.96°C (±0.39°C) with HS; and for the molars, 2.48°C (±0.38°C) with PSD and 0.92°C (±0.18°C) with HS. There was significant difference (p < 0.001) in pulp temperature variation among the stripping techniques evaluated. Greater variations in the temperature were observed for the stripping technique with PSD for all groups (3.1°C in incisors and premolars, 3.2°C in molars). Stripping performed with HS had minor differences in pulp temperature (1.7°C in incisors, 1.9°C in premolars, and 1.2°C in molars) than those in PSD group. However, the temperature variation was less than the critical threshold (5.5°C) in all groups. The results for teeth group comparison showed no significant difference in the temperature variation. CONCLUSIONS: The stripping technique with PSD produced significant increase in pulp temperature, with no differences between the types of teeth. However, it may not be clinically relevant, and both stripping techniques can be used safely.