Cargando…

Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) are a frequently used class of antihypertensive drug. The ARB losartan is known to decrease the serum uric acid (SUA) level. However, there are very few clinical data comparing the effects of other ARBs on SUA level under the conditions of cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishida, Yayoi, Takahashi, Yasuo, Susa, Norio, Kanou, Nobukazu, Nakayama, Tomohiro, Asai, Satoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-12-159
_version_ 1782336675479814144
author Nishida, Yayoi
Takahashi, Yasuo
Susa, Norio
Kanou, Nobukazu
Nakayama, Tomohiro
Asai, Satoshi
author_facet Nishida, Yayoi
Takahashi, Yasuo
Susa, Norio
Kanou, Nobukazu
Nakayama, Tomohiro
Asai, Satoshi
author_sort Nishida, Yayoi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) are a frequently used class of antihypertensive drug. The ARB losartan is known to decrease the serum uric acid (SUA) level. However, there are very few clinical data comparing the effects of other ARBs on SUA level under the conditions of clinical practice. This study evaluated and compared the long-term effects of monotherapy with five ARBs on SUA level in Japanese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: We identified hypertensive patients with type 2 DM who had been treated with monotherapy with losartan (n = 214), valsartan (n = 266), telmisartan (n = 185), candesartan (n = 458), or olmesartan (n = 192), in whom laboratory data of SUA between November 1, 2004 and July 31, 2011 were available, from the Nihon University School of Medicine’s Clinical Data Warehouse (NUSM’s CDW). We used a propensity-score weighting method and a multivariate regression model to adjust for differences in the background among ARB users, and compared the SUA level. The mean exposure of losartan was 264.7 days, valsartan 245.3 days, telmisartan 235.9 days, candesartan 248.9 days, and olmesartan 234.5 days. RESULTS: In losartan users, mean SUA level was significantly decreased from baseline, while it was conversely increased in users of other ARBs; valsartan, telmisartan, candesartan, and olmesartan. The mean reduction of SUA level from baseline was significantly greater in losartan users compared with that in other ARB users. Comparison of ARBs other than losartan showed no significant difference in mean change in SUA level from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that losartan had the most beneficial effect on SUA level among five ARBs, and that there was no significant difference in the unfavorable effects on SUA level among four ARBs other than losartan, at least during one year. These findings provide evidence of an effect of ARBs on SUA level, and support the benefit of the use of losartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 DM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4176752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41767522014-09-28 Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study Nishida, Yayoi Takahashi, Yasuo Susa, Norio Kanou, Nobukazu Nakayama, Tomohiro Asai, Satoshi Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) are a frequently used class of antihypertensive drug. The ARB losartan is known to decrease the serum uric acid (SUA) level. However, there are very few clinical data comparing the effects of other ARBs on SUA level under the conditions of clinical practice. This study evaluated and compared the long-term effects of monotherapy with five ARBs on SUA level in Japanese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: We identified hypertensive patients with type 2 DM who had been treated with monotherapy with losartan (n = 214), valsartan (n = 266), telmisartan (n = 185), candesartan (n = 458), or olmesartan (n = 192), in whom laboratory data of SUA between November 1, 2004 and July 31, 2011 were available, from the Nihon University School of Medicine’s Clinical Data Warehouse (NUSM’s CDW). We used a propensity-score weighting method and a multivariate regression model to adjust for differences in the background among ARB users, and compared the SUA level. The mean exposure of losartan was 264.7 days, valsartan 245.3 days, telmisartan 235.9 days, candesartan 248.9 days, and olmesartan 234.5 days. RESULTS: In losartan users, mean SUA level was significantly decreased from baseline, while it was conversely increased in users of other ARBs; valsartan, telmisartan, candesartan, and olmesartan. The mean reduction of SUA level from baseline was significantly greater in losartan users compared with that in other ARB users. Comparison of ARBs other than losartan showed no significant difference in mean change in SUA level from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that losartan had the most beneficial effect on SUA level among five ARBs, and that there was no significant difference in the unfavorable effects on SUA level among four ARBs other than losartan, at least during one year. These findings provide evidence of an effect of ARBs on SUA level, and support the benefit of the use of losartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 DM. BioMed Central 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4176752/ /pubmed/24180232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-12-159 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nishida et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Nishida, Yayoi
Takahashi, Yasuo
Susa, Norio
Kanou, Nobukazu
Nakayama, Tomohiro
Asai, Satoshi
Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
title Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
title_full Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
title_short Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
title_sort comparative effect of angiotensin ii type i receptor blockers on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-12-159
work_keys_str_mv AT nishidayayoi comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersonserumuricacidinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT takahashiyasuo comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersonserumuricacidinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT susanorio comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersonserumuricacidinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kanounobukazu comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersonserumuricacidinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nakayamatomohiro comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersonserumuricacidinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT asaisatoshi comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersonserumuricacidinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusaretrospectiveobservationalstudy