Cargando…

The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain and low back pain (LBP) in particular is one of the more costly health challenges to society. The STarT Back Tool (SBT) has been developed in the UK with a view to identifying subgroups of LBP patients in order to guide more cost effective care decisions. The Bournem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irgens, Pernille, Lothe, Lise R, Kvammen, Ole Christian, Field, Jonathan, Newell, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24268179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-21-41
_version_ 1782336700982231040
author Irgens, Pernille
Lothe, Lise R
Kvammen, Ole Christian
Field, Jonathan
Newell, David
author_facet Irgens, Pernille
Lothe, Lise R
Kvammen, Ole Christian
Field, Jonathan
Newell, David
author_sort Irgens, Pernille
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain and low back pain (LBP) in particular is one of the more costly health challenges to society. The STarT Back Tool (SBT) has been developed in the UK with a view to identifying subgroups of LBP patients in order to guide more cost effective care decisions. The Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) is a validated multidimensional patient reported outcome measure (PROM) that is widely used in routine clinical practice settings. This study sets out to describe and compare SBT and BQ scores within and between populations of patients presenting for chiropractic care in Norway and Great Britain. METHODS: Patient demographics, BQ and the 5-item generic condition SBT data were collected from patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain to 18 Norwegian and 12 English chiropractors. Analysis of correlation between groups was achieved using a 1-way Chi2 approximation (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Eleven percent of Norwegian LBP patients (n = 214) and 24% of English LBP patients (n = 186) were “distressed by their condition” (SBT > 4). By comparison, Norwegian chiropractic patients are: somewhat younger, have lower BQ scores, are less distressed by the condition and score significantly lower on items relating to catastrophisation and depression than English patients. There was an apparent association between total BQ and SBT scores (correlation 0.59, p < .0001) and patients who scored higher than 45 (IQR 39–58) on BQ were more likely to respond “distressed by condition” (>4) on SBT. Furthermore, patients in “distressed by condition” SBT category who had marked the “low mood” question on SBT also had a high score on the “depression” question of BQ (>6 (IQR 4–8), correlation 0.54, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: The BQ and SBT appear to identify the same subgroups in some, but not all of the measured items. It appears that unknown factors result in variations between patients seeking chiropractic care for comparable complaints in primary care in England vs Norway. Comparison of populations from Norway and UK demonstrate that extrapolating and pooling of data in relation to different populations should be done with caution, in regard to these stratification tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4176988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41769882014-09-28 The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire Irgens, Pernille Lothe, Lise R Kvammen, Ole Christian Field, Jonathan Newell, David Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain and low back pain (LBP) in particular is one of the more costly health challenges to society. The STarT Back Tool (SBT) has been developed in the UK with a view to identifying subgroups of LBP patients in order to guide more cost effective care decisions. The Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) is a validated multidimensional patient reported outcome measure (PROM) that is widely used in routine clinical practice settings. This study sets out to describe and compare SBT and BQ scores within and between populations of patients presenting for chiropractic care in Norway and Great Britain. METHODS: Patient demographics, BQ and the 5-item generic condition SBT data were collected from patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain to 18 Norwegian and 12 English chiropractors. Analysis of correlation between groups was achieved using a 1-way Chi2 approximation (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Eleven percent of Norwegian LBP patients (n = 214) and 24% of English LBP patients (n = 186) were “distressed by their condition” (SBT > 4). By comparison, Norwegian chiropractic patients are: somewhat younger, have lower BQ scores, are less distressed by the condition and score significantly lower on items relating to catastrophisation and depression than English patients. There was an apparent association between total BQ and SBT scores (correlation 0.59, p < .0001) and patients who scored higher than 45 (IQR 39–58) on BQ were more likely to respond “distressed by condition” (>4) on SBT. Furthermore, patients in “distressed by condition” SBT category who had marked the “low mood” question on SBT also had a high score on the “depression” question of BQ (>6 (IQR 4–8), correlation 0.54, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: The BQ and SBT appear to identify the same subgroups in some, but not all of the measured items. It appears that unknown factors result in variations between patients seeking chiropractic care for comparable complaints in primary care in England vs Norway. Comparison of populations from Norway and UK demonstrate that extrapolating and pooling of data in relation to different populations should be done with caution, in regard to these stratification tools. BioMed Central 2013-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4176988/ /pubmed/24268179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-21-41 Text en Copyright © 2013 Irgens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Irgens, Pernille
Lothe, Lise R
Kvammen, Ole Christian
Field, Jonathan
Newell, David
The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire
title The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire
title_full The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire
title_fullStr The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire
title_short The psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in Norway and England: using and comparing the generic versions of the STarT Back 5-item screening tool and the Bournemouth Questionnaire
title_sort psychometric profile of chiropractic patients in norway and england: using and comparing the generic versions of the start back 5-item screening tool and the bournemouth questionnaire
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24268179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-21-41
work_keys_str_mv AT irgenspernille thepsychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT lotheliser thepsychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT kvammenolechristian thepsychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT fieldjonathan thepsychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT newelldavid thepsychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT irgenspernille psychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT lotheliser psychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT kvammenolechristian psychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT fieldjonathan psychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire
AT newelldavid psychometricprofileofchiropracticpatientsinnorwayandenglandusingandcomparingthegenericversionsofthestartback5itemscreeningtoolandthebournemouthquestionnaire