Cargando…

The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common and serious problem among acutely unwell persons. Alhough linked to higher rates of mortality, institutionalisation and dementia, it remains underdiagnosed. Careful consideration of its phenomenology is warranted to improve detection and therefore mitigate some of it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25300023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2
_version_ 1782336714494181376
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common and serious problem among acutely unwell persons. Alhough linked to higher rates of mortality, institutionalisation and dementia, it remains underdiagnosed. Careful consideration of its phenomenology is warranted to improve detection and therefore mitigate some of its clinical impact. The publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) provides an opportunity to examine the constructs underlying delirium as a clinical entity. DISCUSSION: Altered consciousness has been regarded as a core feature of delirium; the fact that consciousness itself should be physiologically disrupted due to acute illness attests to its clinical urgency. DSM-5 now operationalises ‘consciousness’ as ‘changes in attention’. It should be recognised that attention relates to content of consciousness, but arousal corresponds to level of consciousness. Reduced arousal is also associated with adverse outcomes. Attention and arousal are hierarchically related; level of arousal must be sufficient before attention can be reasonably tested. SUMMARY: Our conceptualisation of delirium must extend beyond what can be assessed through cognitive testing (attention) and accept that altered arousal is fundamental. Understanding the DSM-5 criteria explicitly in this way offers the most inclusive and clinically safe interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4177077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41770772014-09-28 The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer BMC Med Opinion BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common and serious problem among acutely unwell persons. Alhough linked to higher rates of mortality, institutionalisation and dementia, it remains underdiagnosed. Careful consideration of its phenomenology is warranted to improve detection and therefore mitigate some of its clinical impact. The publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) provides an opportunity to examine the constructs underlying delirium as a clinical entity. DISCUSSION: Altered consciousness has been regarded as a core feature of delirium; the fact that consciousness itself should be physiologically disrupted due to acute illness attests to its clinical urgency. DSM-5 now operationalises ‘consciousness’ as ‘changes in attention’. It should be recognised that attention relates to content of consciousness, but arousal corresponds to level of consciousness. Reduced arousal is also associated with adverse outcomes. Attention and arousal are hierarchically related; level of arousal must be sufficient before attention can be reasonably tested. SUMMARY: Our conceptualisation of delirium must extend beyond what can be assessed through cognitive testing (attention) and accept that altered arousal is fundamental. Understanding the DSM-5 criteria explicitly in this way offers the most inclusive and clinically safe interpretation. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4177077/ /pubmed/25300023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2 Text en © European Delirium Association et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Opinion
The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
title The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
title_full The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
title_fullStr The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
title_full_unstemmed The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
title_short The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
title_sort dsm-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25300023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2
work_keys_str_mv AT thedsm5criterialevelofarousalanddeliriumdiagnosisinclusivenessissafer
AT thedsm5criterialevelofarousalanddeliriumdiagnosisinclusivenessissafer
AT dsm5criterialevelofarousalanddeliriumdiagnosisinclusivenessissafer
AT dsm5criterialevelofarousalanddeliriumdiagnosisinclusivenessissafer