Cargando…
Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system
The lack of formal training programs for peer reviewers places the scientific quality of biomedical publications at risk, as the introduction of ‘hidden’ bias may not be easily recognized by the reader. The exponential increase in the number of manuscripts submitted for publication worldwide, estima...
Autores principales: | Stahel, Philip F, Moore, Ernest E |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25270270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0179-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
"Metabolic staging" after major trauma - a guide for clinical decision making?
por: Stahel, Philip F, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews?
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
por: Byrne, Jennifer A.
Publicado: (2016) -
Improving the reliability of peer-reviewed publications: We are all in it together
por: Bustin, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)