Cargando…
Cross-sectional analysis of the reporting of continuous outcome measures and clinical significance of results in randomized trials of non-pharmacological interventions
BACKGROUND: Reporting the scoring details of continuous outcome measures in randomized trials allows readers to interpret the size of any effect of the intervention. This study aimed to determine, in a sample of randomized trials: 1) the completeness of reporting of scoring details for continuous ou...
Autores principales: | Hoffmann, Tammy C, Thomas, Sarah T, Shin, Paul Ng Hung, Glasziou, Paul P |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-362 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials
por: Hoffmann, Tammy C, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions
por: Hoffmann, Tammy C, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured
por: Albarqouni, Loai, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties
por: Hoffmann, Tammy, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors
por: Hoffmann, Tammy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)