Cargando…

Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study

PURPOSE: Conventional meshes for hernia repair and abdominal wall reinforcement are usually made from polypropylene, polyester or other synthetic plastic materials known to promote foreign body reactions and a state of chronic inflammation that may lead to long-term complications. A novel approach i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz-Jasbon, F., Norrby, J., Ivarsson, M.-L., Björck, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24770701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1249-1
_version_ 1782336784802250752
author Ruiz-Jasbon, F.
Norrby, J.
Ivarsson, M.-L.
Björck, S.
author_facet Ruiz-Jasbon, F.
Norrby, J.
Ivarsson, M.-L.
Björck, S.
author_sort Ruiz-Jasbon, F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Conventional meshes for hernia repair and abdominal wall reinforcement are usually made from polypropylene, polyester or other synthetic plastic materials known to promote foreign body reactions and a state of chronic inflammation that may lead to long-term complications. A novel approach is to use long-term resorbable implants like TIGR(®) Matrix Surgical Mesh. Preclinical studies have shown that this mesh maintains mechanical integrity beyond the point in time where newly formed tissue is capable of carrying the abdominal loads. METHODS: This was a first-in-man, prospective, pilot study performed during 2009, at two sites in Sweden. Forty patients with primary inguinal hernias were enrolled for Lichtenstein repair using TIGR(®) Matrix Surgical Mesh. The primary endpoint was safety as assessed by monitoring the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) both related and unrelated to the mesh. The secondary endpoint was pain or discomfort. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0–10 and Inguinal Pain Questionnaire were used for scoring pain and discomfort. Included patients have been followed for 36 months using ultrasound in combination with clinical examination. RESULTS: All patients followed a normal early postoperative course. After 12 months no SAEs were reported. None of the patients with an isolated lateral inguinal hernia (LIH) had developed a recurrence but 4 (44 %) with medial and 4 (33 %) with combined hernias had recurred at 36-month follow-up. After 3-year follow-up none of the patients with LIH reported pain in the VAS-form and none of those patients could feel the sensation of a mesh in their groin. In the total study population 5 (16 %) patients experienced chronic pain in the form of mild sporadic pain and 3 (9.7 %) patients could feel the sensation of a mesh in their groin. CONCLUSION: The use of a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh (TIGR(®) Matrix Surgical Mesh) in Lichtenstein repair was found to be safe, without recurrences, and promising regarding pain/discomfort at 3-year follow-up in patients with LIH. However, patients with medial and combined inguinal hernias had high recurrence rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4177566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41775662014-09-30 Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study Ruiz-Jasbon, F. Norrby, J. Ivarsson, M.-L. Björck, S. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: Conventional meshes for hernia repair and abdominal wall reinforcement are usually made from polypropylene, polyester or other synthetic plastic materials known to promote foreign body reactions and a state of chronic inflammation that may lead to long-term complications. A novel approach is to use long-term resorbable implants like TIGR(®) Matrix Surgical Mesh. Preclinical studies have shown that this mesh maintains mechanical integrity beyond the point in time where newly formed tissue is capable of carrying the abdominal loads. METHODS: This was a first-in-man, prospective, pilot study performed during 2009, at two sites in Sweden. Forty patients with primary inguinal hernias were enrolled for Lichtenstein repair using TIGR(®) Matrix Surgical Mesh. The primary endpoint was safety as assessed by monitoring the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) both related and unrelated to the mesh. The secondary endpoint was pain or discomfort. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0–10 and Inguinal Pain Questionnaire were used for scoring pain and discomfort. Included patients have been followed for 36 months using ultrasound in combination with clinical examination. RESULTS: All patients followed a normal early postoperative course. After 12 months no SAEs were reported. None of the patients with an isolated lateral inguinal hernia (LIH) had developed a recurrence but 4 (44 %) with medial and 4 (33 %) with combined hernias had recurred at 36-month follow-up. After 3-year follow-up none of the patients with LIH reported pain in the VAS-form and none of those patients could feel the sensation of a mesh in their groin. In the total study population 5 (16 %) patients experienced chronic pain in the form of mild sporadic pain and 3 (9.7 %) patients could feel the sensation of a mesh in their groin. CONCLUSION: The use of a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh (TIGR(®) Matrix Surgical Mesh) in Lichtenstein repair was found to be safe, without recurrences, and promising regarding pain/discomfort at 3-year follow-up in patients with LIH. However, patients with medial and combined inguinal hernias had high recurrence rates. Springer Paris 2014-04-26 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4177566/ /pubmed/24770701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1249-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ruiz-Jasbon, F.
Norrby, J.
Ivarsson, M.-L.
Björck, S.
Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
title Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
title_full Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
title_fullStr Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
title_full_unstemmed Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
title_short Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
title_sort inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24770701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1249-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizjasbonf inguinalherniarepairusingasyntheticlongtermresorbablemeshresultsfroma3yearprospectivesafetyandperformancestudy
AT norrbyj inguinalherniarepairusingasyntheticlongtermresorbablemeshresultsfroma3yearprospectivesafetyandperformancestudy
AT ivarssonml inguinalherniarepairusingasyntheticlongtermresorbablemeshresultsfroma3yearprospectivesafetyandperformancestudy
AT bjorcks inguinalherniarepairusingasyntheticlongtermresorbablemeshresultsfroma3yearprospectivesafetyandperformancestudy