Cargando…

The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Ageing populations may demand more blood transfusions, but the blood supply could be limited by difficulties in attracting and retaining a decreasing pool of younger donors. One approach to increase blood supply is to collect blood more frequently from existing donors. If more donations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Carmel, Sambrook, Jennifer, Walker, Matthew, Tolkien, Zoe, Kaptoge, Stephen, Allen, David, Mehenny, Susan, Mant, Jonathan, Angelantonio, Emanuele Di, Thompson, Simon G, Ouwehand, Willem, Roberts, David J, Danesh, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-363
_version_ 1782336816736632832
author Moore, Carmel
Sambrook, Jennifer
Walker, Matthew
Tolkien, Zoe
Kaptoge, Stephen
Allen, David
Mehenny, Susan
Mant, Jonathan
Angelantonio, Emanuele Di
Thompson, Simon G
Ouwehand, Willem
Roberts, David J
Danesh, John
author_facet Moore, Carmel
Sambrook, Jennifer
Walker, Matthew
Tolkien, Zoe
Kaptoge, Stephen
Allen, David
Mehenny, Susan
Mant, Jonathan
Angelantonio, Emanuele Di
Thompson, Simon G
Ouwehand, Willem
Roberts, David J
Danesh, John
author_sort Moore, Carmel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ageing populations may demand more blood transfusions, but the blood supply could be limited by difficulties in attracting and retaining a decreasing pool of younger donors. One approach to increase blood supply is to collect blood more frequently from existing donors. If more donations could be safely collected in this manner at marginal cost, then it would be of considerable benefit to blood services. National Health Service (NHS) Blood and Transplant in England currently allows men to donate up to every 12 weeks and women to donate up to every 16 weeks. In contrast, some other European countries allow donations as frequently as every 8 weeks for men and every 10 weeks for women. The primary aim of the INTERVAL trial is to determine whether donation intervals can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply whilst maintaining the health of donors. METHODS/DESIGN: INTERVAL is a randomised trial of whole blood donors enrolled from all 25 static centres of NHS Blood and Transplant. Recruitment of about 50,000 male and female donors started in June 2012 and was completed in June 2014. Men have been randomly assigned to standard 12-week versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, while women have been assigned to standard 16-week versus 14-week versus 12-week inter-donation intervals. Sex-specific comparisons will be made by intention-to-treat analysis of outcomes assessed after two years of intervention. The primary outcome is the number of blood donations made. A key secondary outcome is donor quality of life, assessed using the Short Form Health Survey. Additional secondary endpoints include the number of ‘deferrals’ due to low haemoglobin (and other factors), iron status, cognitive function, physical activity, and donor attitudes. A comprehensive health economic analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: The INTERVAL trial should yield novel information about the effect of inter-donation intervals on blood supply, acceptability, and donors’ physical and mental well-being. The study will generate scientific evidence to help formulate blood collection policies in England and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24760606, 25 January 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4177700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41777002014-09-29 The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Moore, Carmel Sambrook, Jennifer Walker, Matthew Tolkien, Zoe Kaptoge, Stephen Allen, David Mehenny, Susan Mant, Jonathan Angelantonio, Emanuele Di Thompson, Simon G Ouwehand, Willem Roberts, David J Danesh, John Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Ageing populations may demand more blood transfusions, but the blood supply could be limited by difficulties in attracting and retaining a decreasing pool of younger donors. One approach to increase blood supply is to collect blood more frequently from existing donors. If more donations could be safely collected in this manner at marginal cost, then it would be of considerable benefit to blood services. National Health Service (NHS) Blood and Transplant in England currently allows men to donate up to every 12 weeks and women to donate up to every 16 weeks. In contrast, some other European countries allow donations as frequently as every 8 weeks for men and every 10 weeks for women. The primary aim of the INTERVAL trial is to determine whether donation intervals can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply whilst maintaining the health of donors. METHODS/DESIGN: INTERVAL is a randomised trial of whole blood donors enrolled from all 25 static centres of NHS Blood and Transplant. Recruitment of about 50,000 male and female donors started in June 2012 and was completed in June 2014. Men have been randomly assigned to standard 12-week versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, while women have been assigned to standard 16-week versus 14-week versus 12-week inter-donation intervals. Sex-specific comparisons will be made by intention-to-treat analysis of outcomes assessed after two years of intervention. The primary outcome is the number of blood donations made. A key secondary outcome is donor quality of life, assessed using the Short Form Health Survey. Additional secondary endpoints include the number of ‘deferrals’ due to low haemoglobin (and other factors), iron status, cognitive function, physical activity, and donor attitudes. A comprehensive health economic analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: The INTERVAL trial should yield novel information about the effect of inter-donation intervals on blood supply, acceptability, and donors’ physical and mental well-being. The study will generate scientific evidence to help formulate blood collection policies in England and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24760606, 25 January 2012. BioMed Central 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4177700/ /pubmed/25230735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-363 Text en © Moore et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Moore, Carmel
Sambrook, Jennifer
Walker, Matthew
Tolkien, Zoe
Kaptoge, Stephen
Allen, David
Mehenny, Susan
Mant, Jonathan
Angelantonio, Emanuele Di
Thompson, Simon G
Ouwehand, Willem
Roberts, David J
Danesh, John
The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort interval trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-363
work_keys_str_mv AT moorecarmel theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sambrookjennifer theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkermatthew theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tolkienzoe theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kaptogestephen theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT allendavid theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mehennysusan theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mantjonathan theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT angelantonioemanueledi theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thompsonsimong theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ouwehandwillem theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robertsdavidj theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daneshjohn theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moorecarmel intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sambrookjennifer intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkermatthew intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tolkienzoe intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kaptogestephen intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT allendavid intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mehennysusan intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mantjonathan intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT angelantonioemanueledi intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thompsonsimong intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ouwehandwillem intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robertsdavidj intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daneshjohn intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial