Cargando…
The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Ageing populations may demand more blood transfusions, but the blood supply could be limited by difficulties in attracting and retaining a decreasing pool of younger donors. One approach to increase blood supply is to collect blood more frequently from existing donors. If more donations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-363 |
_version_ | 1782336816736632832 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Carmel Sambrook, Jennifer Walker, Matthew Tolkien, Zoe Kaptoge, Stephen Allen, David Mehenny, Susan Mant, Jonathan Angelantonio, Emanuele Di Thompson, Simon G Ouwehand, Willem Roberts, David J Danesh, John |
author_facet | Moore, Carmel Sambrook, Jennifer Walker, Matthew Tolkien, Zoe Kaptoge, Stephen Allen, David Mehenny, Susan Mant, Jonathan Angelantonio, Emanuele Di Thompson, Simon G Ouwehand, Willem Roberts, David J Danesh, John |
author_sort | Moore, Carmel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ageing populations may demand more blood transfusions, but the blood supply could be limited by difficulties in attracting and retaining a decreasing pool of younger donors. One approach to increase blood supply is to collect blood more frequently from existing donors. If more donations could be safely collected in this manner at marginal cost, then it would be of considerable benefit to blood services. National Health Service (NHS) Blood and Transplant in England currently allows men to donate up to every 12 weeks and women to donate up to every 16 weeks. In contrast, some other European countries allow donations as frequently as every 8 weeks for men and every 10 weeks for women. The primary aim of the INTERVAL trial is to determine whether donation intervals can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply whilst maintaining the health of donors. METHODS/DESIGN: INTERVAL is a randomised trial of whole blood donors enrolled from all 25 static centres of NHS Blood and Transplant. Recruitment of about 50,000 male and female donors started in June 2012 and was completed in June 2014. Men have been randomly assigned to standard 12-week versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, while women have been assigned to standard 16-week versus 14-week versus 12-week inter-donation intervals. Sex-specific comparisons will be made by intention-to-treat analysis of outcomes assessed after two years of intervention. The primary outcome is the number of blood donations made. A key secondary outcome is donor quality of life, assessed using the Short Form Health Survey. Additional secondary endpoints include the number of ‘deferrals’ due to low haemoglobin (and other factors), iron status, cognitive function, physical activity, and donor attitudes. A comprehensive health economic analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: The INTERVAL trial should yield novel information about the effect of inter-donation intervals on blood supply, acceptability, and donors’ physical and mental well-being. The study will generate scientific evidence to help formulate blood collection policies in England and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24760606, 25 January 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4177700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41777002014-09-29 The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Moore, Carmel Sambrook, Jennifer Walker, Matthew Tolkien, Zoe Kaptoge, Stephen Allen, David Mehenny, Susan Mant, Jonathan Angelantonio, Emanuele Di Thompson, Simon G Ouwehand, Willem Roberts, David J Danesh, John Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Ageing populations may demand more blood transfusions, but the blood supply could be limited by difficulties in attracting and retaining a decreasing pool of younger donors. One approach to increase blood supply is to collect blood more frequently from existing donors. If more donations could be safely collected in this manner at marginal cost, then it would be of considerable benefit to blood services. National Health Service (NHS) Blood and Transplant in England currently allows men to donate up to every 12 weeks and women to donate up to every 16 weeks. In contrast, some other European countries allow donations as frequently as every 8 weeks for men and every 10 weeks for women. The primary aim of the INTERVAL trial is to determine whether donation intervals can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply whilst maintaining the health of donors. METHODS/DESIGN: INTERVAL is a randomised trial of whole blood donors enrolled from all 25 static centres of NHS Blood and Transplant. Recruitment of about 50,000 male and female donors started in June 2012 and was completed in June 2014. Men have been randomly assigned to standard 12-week versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, while women have been assigned to standard 16-week versus 14-week versus 12-week inter-donation intervals. Sex-specific comparisons will be made by intention-to-treat analysis of outcomes assessed after two years of intervention. The primary outcome is the number of blood donations made. A key secondary outcome is donor quality of life, assessed using the Short Form Health Survey. Additional secondary endpoints include the number of ‘deferrals’ due to low haemoglobin (and other factors), iron status, cognitive function, physical activity, and donor attitudes. A comprehensive health economic analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: The INTERVAL trial should yield novel information about the effect of inter-donation intervals on blood supply, acceptability, and donors’ physical and mental well-being. The study will generate scientific evidence to help formulate blood collection policies in England and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24760606, 25 January 2012. BioMed Central 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4177700/ /pubmed/25230735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-363 Text en © Moore et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Moore, Carmel Sambrook, Jennifer Walker, Matthew Tolkien, Zoe Kaptoge, Stephen Allen, David Mehenny, Susan Mant, Jonathan Angelantonio, Emanuele Di Thompson, Simon G Ouwehand, Willem Roberts, David J Danesh, John The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | interval trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorecarmel theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sambrookjennifer theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walkermatthew theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tolkienzoe theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kaptogestephen theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT allendavid theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mehennysusan theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mantjonathan theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT angelantonioemanueledi theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thompsonsimong theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ouwehandwillem theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT robertsdavidj theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT daneshjohn theintervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moorecarmel intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sambrookjennifer intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walkermatthew intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tolkienzoe intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kaptogestephen intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT allendavid intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mehennysusan intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mantjonathan intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT angelantonioemanueledi intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thompsonsimong intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ouwehandwillem intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT robertsdavidj intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT daneshjohn intervaltrialtodeterminewhetherintervalsbetweenblooddonationscanbesafelyandacceptablydecreasedtooptimisebloodsupplystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |