Cargando…

Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to compare the measurements of the mandible morphology using 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with those using 2D CBCT-synthesized cephalograms; to quantify errors in measurements based on 2D synthesized cephalograms; and to clarify the effects such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hsien-Shu, Li, Jia-Da, Chen, Yunn-Jy, Lin, Cheng-Chung, Lu, Tung-Wu, Chen, Mu-Hsiung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-133
_version_ 1782336817662525440
author Lin, Hsien-Shu
Li, Jia-Da
Chen, Yunn-Jy
Lin, Cheng-Chung
Lu, Tung-Wu
Chen, Mu-Hsiung
author_facet Lin, Hsien-Shu
Li, Jia-Da
Chen, Yunn-Jy
Lin, Cheng-Chung
Lu, Tung-Wu
Chen, Mu-Hsiung
author_sort Lin, Hsien-Shu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to compare the measurements of the mandible morphology using 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with those using 2D CBCT-synthesized cephalograms; to quantify errors in measurements based on 2D synthesized cephalograms; and to clarify the effects such errors have on the description of the mandibular growth. METHODS: Mandibles of six miniature pigs were scanned monthly using CBCT over 12 months and the data were used to reconstruct the 3D bone models. Five anatomical landmarks were identified on each bone model, and the inter-marker distances and monthly distance changes were calculated and taken as the gold standard. Synthetic 2D cephalograms were also generated for each bone model using a digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR)-generation method. Errors in cephalogram measurements were determined as the differences between the calculated variables in cephalograms and the gold standard. The variations between cephalograms and the gold standard were also compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: While the inter-marker distance increases varied among the marker pairs, all marker pairs increased their inter-marker distances gradually every month, reaching 50% of the total annual increases during the fourth and fifth months, and then slowing down in the subsequent months. The 2D measurements significantly underestimated most of the inter-marker distances throughout the monitoring period, in most of the monthly inter-marker distance changes during the first four months, and in the total growth (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant errors exist in the measurements using 2D synthesized cephalogram, underestimating the mandibular dimensions and their monthly changes in the early stages of growth, as well as the total annual growth. These results should be considered in dental treatment planning at the beginning of the treatment in order to control more precisely the treatment process and outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4177704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41777042014-09-29 Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms Lin, Hsien-Shu Li, Jia-Da Chen, Yunn-Jy Lin, Cheng-Chung Lu, Tung-Wu Chen, Mu-Hsiung Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to compare the measurements of the mandible morphology using 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with those using 2D CBCT-synthesized cephalograms; to quantify errors in measurements based on 2D synthesized cephalograms; and to clarify the effects such errors have on the description of the mandibular growth. METHODS: Mandibles of six miniature pigs were scanned monthly using CBCT over 12 months and the data were used to reconstruct the 3D bone models. Five anatomical landmarks were identified on each bone model, and the inter-marker distances and monthly distance changes were calculated and taken as the gold standard. Synthetic 2D cephalograms were also generated for each bone model using a digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR)-generation method. Errors in cephalogram measurements were determined as the differences between the calculated variables in cephalograms and the gold standard. The variations between cephalograms and the gold standard were also compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: While the inter-marker distance increases varied among the marker pairs, all marker pairs increased their inter-marker distances gradually every month, reaching 50% of the total annual increases during the fourth and fifth months, and then slowing down in the subsequent months. The 2D measurements significantly underestimated most of the inter-marker distances throughout the monitoring period, in most of the monthly inter-marker distance changes during the first four months, and in the total growth (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant errors exist in the measurements using 2D synthesized cephalogram, underestimating the mandibular dimensions and their monthly changes in the early stages of growth, as well as the total annual growth. These results should be considered in dental treatment planning at the beginning of the treatment in order to control more precisely the treatment process and outcome. BioMed Central 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4177704/ /pubmed/25208578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-133 Text en © Lin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lin, Hsien-Shu
Li, Jia-Da
Chen, Yunn-Jy
Lin, Cheng-Chung
Lu, Tung-Wu
Chen, Mu-Hsiung
Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
title Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
title_full Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
title_fullStr Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
title_short Comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
title_sort comparison of measurements of mandible growth using cone beam computed tomography and its synthesized cephalograms
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-133
work_keys_str_mv AT linhsienshu comparisonofmeasurementsofmandiblegrowthusingconebeamcomputedtomographyanditssynthesizedcephalograms
AT lijiada comparisonofmeasurementsofmandiblegrowthusingconebeamcomputedtomographyanditssynthesizedcephalograms
AT chenyunnjy comparisonofmeasurementsofmandiblegrowthusingconebeamcomputedtomographyanditssynthesizedcephalograms
AT linchengchung comparisonofmeasurementsofmandiblegrowthusingconebeamcomputedtomographyanditssynthesizedcephalograms
AT lutungwu comparisonofmeasurementsofmandiblegrowthusingconebeamcomputedtomographyanditssynthesizedcephalograms
AT chenmuhsiung comparisonofmeasurementsofmandiblegrowthusingconebeamcomputedtomographyanditssynthesizedcephalograms