Cargando…

Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa

The major etiological agent of rabies, rabies virus (RABV), accounts for tens of thousands of human deaths per annum. The majority of these deaths are associated with rabies cycles in dogs in resource-limited countries of Africa and Asia. Although routine rabies diagnosis plays an integral role in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coetzer, Andre, Sabeta, Claude T., Markotter, Wanda, Rupprecht, Charles E., Nel, Louis H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25254652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003189
_version_ 1782336855150166016
author Coetzer, Andre
Sabeta, Claude T.
Markotter, Wanda
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Nel, Louis H.
author_facet Coetzer, Andre
Sabeta, Claude T.
Markotter, Wanda
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Nel, Louis H.
author_sort Coetzer, Andre
collection PubMed
description The major etiological agent of rabies, rabies virus (RABV), accounts for tens of thousands of human deaths per annum. The majority of these deaths are associated with rabies cycles in dogs in resource-limited countries of Africa and Asia. Although routine rabies diagnosis plays an integral role in disease surveillance and management, the application of the currently recommended direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test in countries on the African and Asian continents remains quite limited. A novel diagnostic assay, the direct rapid immunohistochemical test (dRIT), has been reported to have a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity equal to that of the DFA test while offering advantages in cost, time and interpretation. Prior studies used the dRIT utilized monoclonal antibody (MAb) cocktails. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a biotinylated polyclonal antibody (PAb) preparation, applied in the dRIT protocol, would yield equal or improved results compared to the use of dRIT with MAbs. We also wanted to compare the PAb dRIT with the DFA test, utilizing the same PAb preparation with a fluorescent label. The PAb dRIT had a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%, which was shown to be marginally higher than the diagnostic efficacy observed for the PAb DFA test. The classical dRIT, relying on two-biotinylated MAbs, was applied to the same panel of samples and a reduced diagnostic sensitivity (83.50% and 90.78% respectively) was observed. Antigenic typing of the false negative samples indicated all of these to be mongoose RABV variants. Our results provided evidence that a dRIT with alternative antibody preparations, conjugated to a biotin moiety, has a diagnostic efficacy equal to that of a DFA relying on the same antibody and that the antibody preparation should be optimized for virus variants specific to the geographical area of focus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4177867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41778672014-10-02 Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa Coetzer, Andre Sabeta, Claude T. Markotter, Wanda Rupprecht, Charles E. Nel, Louis H. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article The major etiological agent of rabies, rabies virus (RABV), accounts for tens of thousands of human deaths per annum. The majority of these deaths are associated with rabies cycles in dogs in resource-limited countries of Africa and Asia. Although routine rabies diagnosis plays an integral role in disease surveillance and management, the application of the currently recommended direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test in countries on the African and Asian continents remains quite limited. A novel diagnostic assay, the direct rapid immunohistochemical test (dRIT), has been reported to have a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity equal to that of the DFA test while offering advantages in cost, time and interpretation. Prior studies used the dRIT utilized monoclonal antibody (MAb) cocktails. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a biotinylated polyclonal antibody (PAb) preparation, applied in the dRIT protocol, would yield equal or improved results compared to the use of dRIT with MAbs. We also wanted to compare the PAb dRIT with the DFA test, utilizing the same PAb preparation with a fluorescent label. The PAb dRIT had a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%, which was shown to be marginally higher than the diagnostic efficacy observed for the PAb DFA test. The classical dRIT, relying on two-biotinylated MAbs, was applied to the same panel of samples and a reduced diagnostic sensitivity (83.50% and 90.78% respectively) was observed. Antigenic typing of the false negative samples indicated all of these to be mongoose RABV variants. Our results provided evidence that a dRIT with alternative antibody preparations, conjugated to a biotin moiety, has a diagnostic efficacy equal to that of a DFA relying on the same antibody and that the antibody preparation should be optimized for virus variants specific to the geographical area of focus. Public Library of Science 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4177867/ /pubmed/25254652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003189 Text en © 2014 Coetzer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coetzer, Andre
Sabeta, Claude T.
Markotter, Wanda
Rupprecht, Charles E.
Nel, Louis H.
Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa
title Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa
title_full Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa
title_fullStr Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa
title_short Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa
title_sort comparison of biotinylated monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies in an evaluation of a direct rapid immunohistochemical test for the routine diagnosis of rabies in southern africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25254652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003189
work_keys_str_mv AT coetzerandre comparisonofbiotinylatedmonoclonalandpolyclonalantibodiesinanevaluationofadirectrapidimmunohistochemicaltestfortheroutinediagnosisofrabiesinsouthernafrica
AT sabetaclaudet comparisonofbiotinylatedmonoclonalandpolyclonalantibodiesinanevaluationofadirectrapidimmunohistochemicaltestfortheroutinediagnosisofrabiesinsouthernafrica
AT markotterwanda comparisonofbiotinylatedmonoclonalandpolyclonalantibodiesinanevaluationofadirectrapidimmunohistochemicaltestfortheroutinediagnosisofrabiesinsouthernafrica
AT rupprechtcharlese comparisonofbiotinylatedmonoclonalandpolyclonalantibodiesinanevaluationofadirectrapidimmunohistochemicaltestfortheroutinediagnosisofrabiesinsouthernafrica
AT nellouish comparisonofbiotinylatedmonoclonalandpolyclonalantibodiesinanevaluationofadirectrapidimmunohistochemicaltestfortheroutinediagnosisofrabiesinsouthernafrica