Cargando…

Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Intradermal MVA85A, a candidate vaccine against tuberculosis, induces high amounts of Ag85A-specific CD4 T cells in adults who have already received the BCG vaccine, but aerosol delivery of this vaccine might offer immunological and logistical advantages. We did a phase 1 double-blind tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satti, Iman, Meyer, Joel, Harris, Stephanie A, Thomas, Zita-Rose Manjaly, Griffiths, Kristin, Antrobus, Richard D, Rowland, Rosalind, Ramon, Raquel Lopez, Smith, Mary, Sheehan, Sharon, Bettinson, Henry, McShane, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25151225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70845-X
_version_ 1782336919219208192
author Satti, Iman
Meyer, Joel
Harris, Stephanie A
Thomas, Zita-Rose Manjaly
Griffiths, Kristin
Antrobus, Richard D
Rowland, Rosalind
Ramon, Raquel Lopez
Smith, Mary
Sheehan, Sharon
Bettinson, Henry
McShane, Helen
author_facet Satti, Iman
Meyer, Joel
Harris, Stephanie A
Thomas, Zita-Rose Manjaly
Griffiths, Kristin
Antrobus, Richard D
Rowland, Rosalind
Ramon, Raquel Lopez
Smith, Mary
Sheehan, Sharon
Bettinson, Henry
McShane, Helen
author_sort Satti, Iman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intradermal MVA85A, a candidate vaccine against tuberculosis, induces high amounts of Ag85A-specific CD4 T cells in adults who have already received the BCG vaccine, but aerosol delivery of this vaccine might offer immunological and logistical advantages. We did a phase 1 double-blind trial to compare the safety and immunogenicity of aerosol-administered and intradermally administered MVA85A METHODS: In this phase 1, double-blind, proof-of-concept trial, 24 eligible BCG-vaccinated healthy UK adults were randomly allocated (1:1) by sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes into two groups: aerosol MVA85A and intradermal saline placebo or intradermal MVA85A and aerosol saline placebo. Participants, the bronchoscopist, and immunologists were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was safety, assessed by the frequency and severity of vaccine-related local and systemic adverse events. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity assessed with laboratory markers of cell-mediated immunity in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed for 24 weeks after vaccination. Immunogenicity to both insert Ag85A and vector modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) was assessed by ex-vivo interferon-γ ELISpot and serum ELISAs. Since all participants were randomised and vaccinated according to protocol, our analyses were per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01497769. FINDINGS: Both administration routes were well tolerated and immunogenic. Respiratory adverse events were rare and mild. Intradermal MVA85A was associated with expected mild local injection-site reactions. Systemic adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Three participants in each group had no vaccine-related systemic adverse events; fatigue (11/24 [46%]) and headache (10/24 [42%]) were the most frequently reported symptoms. Ag85A-specific systemic responses were similar across groups. Ag85A-specific CD4 T cells were detected in bronchoalveolar lavage cells from both groups and responses were higher in the aerosol group than in the intradermal group. MVA-specific cellular responses were detected in both groups, whereas serum antibodies to MVA were only detectable after intradermal administration of the vaccine. INTERPRETATION: Further clinical trials assessing the aerosol route of vaccine delivery are merited for tuberculosis and other respiratory pathogens. FUNDING: The Wellcome Trust and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4178237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41782372014-10-13 Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial Satti, Iman Meyer, Joel Harris, Stephanie A Thomas, Zita-Rose Manjaly Griffiths, Kristin Antrobus, Richard D Rowland, Rosalind Ramon, Raquel Lopez Smith, Mary Sheehan, Sharon Bettinson, Henry McShane, Helen Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: Intradermal MVA85A, a candidate vaccine against tuberculosis, induces high amounts of Ag85A-specific CD4 T cells in adults who have already received the BCG vaccine, but aerosol delivery of this vaccine might offer immunological and logistical advantages. We did a phase 1 double-blind trial to compare the safety and immunogenicity of aerosol-administered and intradermally administered MVA85A METHODS: In this phase 1, double-blind, proof-of-concept trial, 24 eligible BCG-vaccinated healthy UK adults were randomly allocated (1:1) by sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes into two groups: aerosol MVA85A and intradermal saline placebo or intradermal MVA85A and aerosol saline placebo. Participants, the bronchoscopist, and immunologists were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was safety, assessed by the frequency and severity of vaccine-related local and systemic adverse events. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity assessed with laboratory markers of cell-mediated immunity in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed for 24 weeks after vaccination. Immunogenicity to both insert Ag85A and vector modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) was assessed by ex-vivo interferon-γ ELISpot and serum ELISAs. Since all participants were randomised and vaccinated according to protocol, our analyses were per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01497769. FINDINGS: Both administration routes were well tolerated and immunogenic. Respiratory adverse events were rare and mild. Intradermal MVA85A was associated with expected mild local injection-site reactions. Systemic adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Three participants in each group had no vaccine-related systemic adverse events; fatigue (11/24 [46%]) and headache (10/24 [42%]) were the most frequently reported symptoms. Ag85A-specific systemic responses were similar across groups. Ag85A-specific CD4 T cells were detected in bronchoalveolar lavage cells from both groups and responses were higher in the aerosol group than in the intradermal group. MVA-specific cellular responses were detected in both groups, whereas serum antibodies to MVA were only detectable after intradermal administration of the vaccine. INTERPRETATION: Further clinical trials assessing the aerosol route of vaccine delivery are merited for tuberculosis and other respiratory pathogens. FUNDING: The Wellcome Trust and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2014-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4178237/ /pubmed/25151225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70845-X Text en © 2014 Satti et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Articles
Satti, Iman
Meyer, Joel
Harris, Stephanie A
Thomas, Zita-Rose Manjaly
Griffiths, Kristin
Antrobus, Richard D
Rowland, Rosalind
Ramon, Raquel Lopez
Smith, Mary
Sheehan, Sharon
Bettinson, Henry
McShane, Helen
Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
title Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
title_full Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
title_short Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
title_sort safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine mva85a delivered by aerosol in bcg-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25151225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70845-X
work_keys_str_mv AT sattiiman safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meyerjoel safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisstephaniea safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomaszitarosemanjaly safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT griffithskristin safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT antrobusrichardd safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rowlandrosalind safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ramonraquellopez safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithmary safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sheehansharon safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bettinsonhenry safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcshanehelen safetyandimmunogenicityofacandidatetuberculosisvaccinemva85adeliveredbyaerosolinbcgvaccinatedhealthyadultsaphase1doubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial