Cargando…

The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness

Preference for phenotypic similarity in assortative mating may be influenced by either a preference for self-similarity or parent-similarity. The aim of the current study was to assess whether people’s preference in face attractiveness is influenced by resemblance to the opposite sex parent’s face (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sulutvedt, Unni, Laeng, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.595
_version_ 1782336959724650496
author Sulutvedt, Unni
Laeng, Bruno
author_facet Sulutvedt, Unni
Laeng, Bruno
author_sort Sulutvedt, Unni
collection PubMed
description Preference for phenotypic similarity in assortative mating may be influenced by either a preference for self-similarity or parent-similarity. The aim of the current study was to assess whether people’s preference in face attractiveness is influenced by resemblance to the opposite sex parent’s face (parental phenotype) or their own face (self-based phenotype or “self-imprinting”). We used computerized image manipulations of facial photographs of participants, their mothers and fathers. The original photographs were combined with 78% of the participants’ opposite sex prototype face (i.e., male and female prototypes made from equal contributions of a hundred faces), creating morphs where the contribution from the familiar faces went unnoticed. Female and male participants ranked these images together with the opposite-sex prototype different familiar morphs. Each participant did the same for the morphs generated with other same-sex participants’ faces and of their parents. We found that the female participants preferred the self-based morphs to the prototype faces. Male participants showed a general tendency towards self-referential standard. Parental face morphs were ranked low in attractiveness, which may be accounted for by the age difference of the faces blended into the self-based versus parental face morphs, since we used present-time photographs of both the participants and their parents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4178458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41784582014-09-30 The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness Sulutvedt, Unni Laeng, Bruno PeerJ Ecology Preference for phenotypic similarity in assortative mating may be influenced by either a preference for self-similarity or parent-similarity. The aim of the current study was to assess whether people’s preference in face attractiveness is influenced by resemblance to the opposite sex parent’s face (parental phenotype) or their own face (self-based phenotype or “self-imprinting”). We used computerized image manipulations of facial photographs of participants, their mothers and fathers. The original photographs were combined with 78% of the participants’ opposite sex prototype face (i.e., male and female prototypes made from equal contributions of a hundred faces), creating morphs where the contribution from the familiar faces went unnoticed. Female and male participants ranked these images together with the opposite-sex prototype different familiar morphs. Each participant did the same for the morphs generated with other same-sex participants’ faces and of their parents. We found that the female participants preferred the self-based morphs to the prototype faces. Male participants showed a general tendency towards self-referential standard. Parental face morphs were ranked low in attractiveness, which may be accounted for by the age difference of the faces blended into the self-based versus parental face morphs, since we used present-time photographs of both the participants and their parents. PeerJ Inc. 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4178458/ /pubmed/25276508 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.595 Text en © 2014 Sulutvedt and Laeng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Sulutvedt, Unni
Laeng, Bruno
The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
title The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
title_full The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
title_fullStr The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
title_full_unstemmed The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
title_short The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
title_sort self prefers itself? self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.595
work_keys_str_mv AT sulutvedtunni theselfprefersitselfselfreferentialversusparentalstandardsinfaceattractiveness
AT laengbruno theselfprefersitselfselfreferentialversusparentalstandardsinfaceattractiveness
AT sulutvedtunni selfprefersitselfselfreferentialversusparentalstandardsinfaceattractiveness
AT laengbruno selfprefersitselfselfreferentialversusparentalstandardsinfaceattractiveness