Cargando…
Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43 |
_version_ | 1782336975429173248 |
---|---|
author | Slota, Christina Ulrich, Connie M Miller-Davis, Claiborne Baker, Karen Wallen, Gwenyth R |
author_facet | Slota, Christina Ulrich, Connie M Miller-Davis, Claiborne Baker, Karen Wallen, Gwenyth R |
author_sort | Slota, Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patients’ perceptions of the process and outcomes of the pain and palliative care consultative services they received while enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: A qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted from a sub-sample of patients (n = 34) with advanced cancers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of a palliative care consult service. Two open-ended questions focused on patient perceptions of continued participation on their primary cancer clinical trials and their perceptions of interdisciplinary communication. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged when asked whether receiving pain and palliative care services made them more likely to remain enrolled in their primary cancer clinical trial: patients’ past experiences with care, self-identified personal characteristics and reasons for participation, and the quality of the partnership. Four themes emerged related to interdisciplinary communication including: the importance of developing relationships, facilitating open communication, having quality communication, and uncertainty about communication between the cancer clinical trial and palliative care teams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the importance of qualitative inquiry methods to explore patient perceptions regarding the efficacy of palliative care services for cancer patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Validation of patient perceptions through qualitative inquiry regarding their pain and palliative care needs can provide insight into areas for future implementation research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protection OHSRP5443 and University of Pennsylvania 813365 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4178548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41785482014-10-01 Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial Slota, Christina Ulrich, Connie M Miller-Davis, Claiborne Baker, Karen Wallen, Gwenyth R BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patients’ perceptions of the process and outcomes of the pain and palliative care consultative services they received while enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: A qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted from a sub-sample of patients (n = 34) with advanced cancers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of a palliative care consult service. Two open-ended questions focused on patient perceptions of continued participation on their primary cancer clinical trials and their perceptions of interdisciplinary communication. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged when asked whether receiving pain and palliative care services made them more likely to remain enrolled in their primary cancer clinical trial: patients’ past experiences with care, self-identified personal characteristics and reasons for participation, and the quality of the partnership. Four themes emerged related to interdisciplinary communication including: the importance of developing relationships, facilitating open communication, having quality communication, and uncertainty about communication between the cancer clinical trial and palliative care teams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the importance of qualitative inquiry methods to explore patient perceptions regarding the efficacy of palliative care services for cancer patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Validation of patient perceptions through qualitative inquiry regarding their pain and palliative care needs can provide insight into areas for future implementation research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protection OHSRP5443 and University of Pennsylvania 813365 BioMed Central 2014-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4178548/ /pubmed/25276094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43 Text en Copyright © 2014 Slota et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Slota, Christina Ulrich, Connie M Miller-Davis, Claiborne Baker, Karen Wallen, Gwenyth R Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
title | Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
title_full | Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
title_short | Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
title_sort | qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slotachristina qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial AT ulrichconniem qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial AT millerdavisclaiborne qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial AT bakerkaren qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial AT wallengwenythr qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial |