Cargando…

Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slota, Christina, Ulrich, Connie M, Miller-Davis, Claiborne, Baker, Karen, Wallen, Gwenyth R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43
_version_ 1782336975429173248
author Slota, Christina
Ulrich, Connie M
Miller-Davis, Claiborne
Baker, Karen
Wallen, Gwenyth R
author_facet Slota, Christina
Ulrich, Connie M
Miller-Davis, Claiborne
Baker, Karen
Wallen, Gwenyth R
author_sort Slota, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patients’ perceptions of the process and outcomes of the pain and palliative care consultative services they received while enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: A qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted from a sub-sample of patients (n = 34) with advanced cancers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of a palliative care consult service. Two open-ended questions focused on patient perceptions of continued participation on their primary cancer clinical trials and their perceptions of interdisciplinary communication. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged when asked whether receiving pain and palliative care services made them more likely to remain enrolled in their primary cancer clinical trial: patients’ past experiences with care, self-identified personal characteristics and reasons for participation, and the quality of the partnership. Four themes emerged related to interdisciplinary communication including: the importance of developing relationships, facilitating open communication, having quality communication, and uncertainty about communication between the cancer clinical trial and palliative care teams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the importance of qualitative inquiry methods to explore patient perceptions regarding the efficacy of palliative care services for cancer patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Validation of patient perceptions through qualitative inquiry regarding their pain and palliative care needs can provide insight into areas for future implementation research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protection OHSRP5443 and University of Pennsylvania 813365
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4178548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41785482014-10-01 Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial Slota, Christina Ulrich, Connie M Miller-Davis, Claiborne Baker, Karen Wallen, Gwenyth R BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patients’ perceptions of the process and outcomes of the pain and palliative care consultative services they received while enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: A qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted from a sub-sample of patients (n = 34) with advanced cancers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of a palliative care consult service. Two open-ended questions focused on patient perceptions of continued participation on their primary cancer clinical trials and their perceptions of interdisciplinary communication. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged when asked whether receiving pain and palliative care services made them more likely to remain enrolled in their primary cancer clinical trial: patients’ past experiences with care, self-identified personal characteristics and reasons for participation, and the quality of the partnership. Four themes emerged related to interdisciplinary communication including: the importance of developing relationships, facilitating open communication, having quality communication, and uncertainty about communication between the cancer clinical trial and palliative care teams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the importance of qualitative inquiry methods to explore patient perceptions regarding the efficacy of palliative care services for cancer patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Validation of patient perceptions through qualitative inquiry regarding their pain and palliative care needs can provide insight into areas for future implementation research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protection OHSRP5443 and University of Pennsylvania 813365 BioMed Central 2014-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4178548/ /pubmed/25276094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43 Text en Copyright © 2014 Slota et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Slota, Christina
Ulrich, Connie M
Miller-Davis, Claiborne
Baker, Karen
Wallen, Gwenyth R
Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
title Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
title_full Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
title_fullStr Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
title_short Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
title_sort qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43
work_keys_str_mv AT slotachristina qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial
AT ulrichconniem qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial
AT millerdavisclaiborne qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial
AT bakerkaren qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial
AT wallengwenythr qualitativeinquiryamethodforvalidatingpatientperceptionsofpalliativecarewhileenrolledonacancerclinicaltrial