Cargando…
Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones
Tracheal sounds have received a lot of attention for estimating ventilation parameters in a non-invasive way. The aim of this work was to examine the feasibility of extracting accurate airflow, and automating the detection of breath-phase onset and respiratory rates all directly from tracheal sounds...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25196108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140813830 |
_version_ | 1782337008917544960 |
---|---|
author | Reyes, Bersain A. Reljin, Natasa Chon, Ki H. |
author_facet | Reyes, Bersain A. Reljin, Natasa Chon, Ki H. |
author_sort | Reyes, Bersain A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tracheal sounds have received a lot of attention for estimating ventilation parameters in a non-invasive way. The aim of this work was to examine the feasibility of extracting accurate airflow, and automating the detection of breath-phase onset and respiratory rates all directly from tracheal sounds acquired from an acoustic microphone connected to a smartphone. We employed the Samsung Galaxy S4 and iPhone 4s smartphones to acquire tracheal sounds from N = 9 healthy volunteers at airflows ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 L/s. We found that the amplitude of the smartphone-acquired sounds was highly correlated with the airflow from a spirometer, and similar to previously-published studies, we found that the increasing tracheal sounds' amplitude as flow increases follows a power law relationship. Acquired tracheal sounds were used for breath-phase onset detection and their onsets differed by only 52 ± 51 ms (mean ± SD) for Galaxy S4, and 51 ± 48 ms for iPhone 4s, when compared to those detected from the reference signal via the spirometer. Moreover, it was found that accurate respiratory rates (RR) can be obtained from tracheal sounds. The correlation index, bias and limits of agreement were r(2) = 0.9693, 0.11 (−1.41 to 1.63) breaths-per-minute (bpm) for Galaxy S4, and r(2) = 0.9672, 0.097 (–1.38 to 1.57) bpm for iPhone 4s, when compared to RR estimated from spirometry. Both smartphone devices performed similarly, as no statistically-significant differences were found. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4179049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41790492014-10-02 Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones Reyes, Bersain A. Reljin, Natasa Chon, Ki H. Sensors (Basel) Article Tracheal sounds have received a lot of attention for estimating ventilation parameters in a non-invasive way. The aim of this work was to examine the feasibility of extracting accurate airflow, and automating the detection of breath-phase onset and respiratory rates all directly from tracheal sounds acquired from an acoustic microphone connected to a smartphone. We employed the Samsung Galaxy S4 and iPhone 4s smartphones to acquire tracheal sounds from N = 9 healthy volunteers at airflows ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 L/s. We found that the amplitude of the smartphone-acquired sounds was highly correlated with the airflow from a spirometer, and similar to previously-published studies, we found that the increasing tracheal sounds' amplitude as flow increases follows a power law relationship. Acquired tracheal sounds were used for breath-phase onset detection and their onsets differed by only 52 ± 51 ms (mean ± SD) for Galaxy S4, and 51 ± 48 ms for iPhone 4s, when compared to those detected from the reference signal via the spirometer. Moreover, it was found that accurate respiratory rates (RR) can be obtained from tracheal sounds. The correlation index, bias and limits of agreement were r(2) = 0.9693, 0.11 (−1.41 to 1.63) breaths-per-minute (bpm) for Galaxy S4, and r(2) = 0.9672, 0.097 (–1.38 to 1.57) bpm for iPhone 4s, when compared to RR estimated from spirometry. Both smartphone devices performed similarly, as no statistically-significant differences were found. MDPI 2014-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4179049/ /pubmed/25196108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140813830 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Reyes, Bersain A. Reljin, Natasa Chon, Ki H. Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones |
title | Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones |
title_full | Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones |
title_fullStr | Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones |
title_full_unstemmed | Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones |
title_short | Tracheal Sounds Acquisition Using Smartphones |
title_sort | tracheal sounds acquisition using smartphones |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25196108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140813830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reyesbersaina trachealsoundsacquisitionusingsmartphones AT reljinnatasa trachealsoundsacquisitionusingsmartphones AT chonkih trachealsoundsacquisitionusingsmartphones |