Cargando…
Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios
Data collection is a key scenario for the Internet of Things because it enables gathering sensor data from distributed nodes that use low-power and long-range wireless technologies to communicate in a single-hop approach. In this kind of scenario, the network is composed of one coordinator that cove...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140813416 |
_version_ | 1782337016134893568 |
---|---|
author | Tuset-Peiro, Pere Vazquez-Gallego, Francisco Alonso-Zarate, Jesus Alonso, Luis Vilajosana, Xavier |
author_facet | Tuset-Peiro, Pere Vazquez-Gallego, Francisco Alonso-Zarate, Jesus Alonso, Luis Vilajosana, Xavier |
author_sort | Tuset-Peiro, Pere |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data collection is a key scenario for the Internet of Things because it enables gathering sensor data from distributed nodes that use low-power and long-range wireless technologies to communicate in a single-hop approach. In this kind of scenario, the network is composed of one coordinator that covers a particular area and a large number of nodes, typically hundreds or thousands, that transmit data to the coordinator upon request. Considering this scenario, in this paper we experimentally validate the energy consumption of two Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols, Frame Slotted ALOHA (FSA) and Distributed Queuing (DQ). We model both protocols as a state machine and conduct experiments to measure the average energy consumption in each state and the average number of times that a node has to be in each state in order to transmit a data packet to the coordinator. The results show that FSA is more energy efficient than DQ if the number of nodes is known a priori because the number of slots per frame can be adjusted accordingly. However, in such scenarios the number of nodes cannot be easily anticipated, leading to additional packet collisions and a higher energy consumption due to retransmissions. Contrarily, DQ does not require to know the number of nodes in advance because it is able to efficiently construct an ad hoc network schedule for each collection round. This kind of a schedule ensures that there are no packet collisions during data transmission, thus leading to an energy consumption reduction above 10% compared to FSA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4179079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41790792014-10-02 Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios Tuset-Peiro, Pere Vazquez-Gallego, Francisco Alonso-Zarate, Jesus Alonso, Luis Vilajosana, Xavier Sensors (Basel) Article Data collection is a key scenario for the Internet of Things because it enables gathering sensor data from distributed nodes that use low-power and long-range wireless technologies to communicate in a single-hop approach. In this kind of scenario, the network is composed of one coordinator that covers a particular area and a large number of nodes, typically hundreds or thousands, that transmit data to the coordinator upon request. Considering this scenario, in this paper we experimentally validate the energy consumption of two Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols, Frame Slotted ALOHA (FSA) and Distributed Queuing (DQ). We model both protocols as a state machine and conduct experiments to measure the average energy consumption in each state and the average number of times that a node has to be in each state in order to transmit a data packet to the coordinator. The results show that FSA is more energy efficient than DQ if the number of nodes is known a priori because the number of slots per frame can be adjusted accordingly. However, in such scenarios the number of nodes cannot be easily anticipated, leading to additional packet collisions and a higher energy consumption due to retransmissions. Contrarily, DQ does not require to know the number of nodes in advance because it is able to efficiently construct an ad hoc network schedule for each collection round. This kind of a schedule ensures that there are no packet collisions during data transmission, thus leading to an energy consumption reduction above 10% compared to FSA. MDPI 2014-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4179079/ /pubmed/25061839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140813416 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tuset-Peiro, Pere Vazquez-Gallego, Francisco Alonso-Zarate, Jesus Alonso, Luis Vilajosana, Xavier Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios |
title | Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios |
title_full | Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios |
title_fullStr | Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios |
title_short | Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios |
title_sort | experimental energy consumption of frame slotted aloha and distributed queuing for data collection scenarios |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140813416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tusetpeiropere experimentalenergyconsumptionofframeslottedalohaanddistributedqueuingfordatacollectionscenarios AT vazquezgallegofrancisco experimentalenergyconsumptionofframeslottedalohaanddistributedqueuingfordatacollectionscenarios AT alonsozaratejesus experimentalenergyconsumptionofframeslottedalohaanddistributedqueuingfordatacollectionscenarios AT alonsoluis experimentalenergyconsumptionofframeslottedalohaanddistributedqueuingfordatacollectionscenarios AT vilajosanaxavier experimentalenergyconsumptionofframeslottedalohaanddistributedqueuingfordatacollectionscenarios |