Cargando…

The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall free flaps are used most frequently in autologous breast reconstruction, and these flaps require intact and robust deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) vessels. Pfannenstiel incisions are often present during preoperative visits for breast reconstruction and could po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Young Jin, Kim, Eun Key, Yun, Ji Young, Eom, Jin Sup, Lee, Taik Jong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276647
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.542
_version_ 1782337069298745344
author Park, Young Jin
Kim, Eun Key
Yun, Ji Young
Eom, Jin Sup
Lee, Taik Jong
author_facet Park, Young Jin
Kim, Eun Key
Yun, Ji Young
Eom, Jin Sup
Lee, Taik Jong
author_sort Park, Young Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall free flaps are used most frequently in autologous breast reconstruction, and these flaps require intact and robust deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) vessels. Pfannenstiel incisions are often present during preoperative visits for breast reconstruction and could potentially signal compromised blood supply to the lower abdominal wall. In this study, we compared the number of DIEP vessels between patients with and without Pfannenstiel incisions undergoing autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed for patients with (study) and without (control) Pfannelstiel incisions (n=34 for each group) between June 2010 and July 2013. In addition to patient demographics, number of caesarian sections, and outcomes of free flap reconstruction, abdominal wall vasculature was compared using the preoperative computed tomography angiographic data between the groups. For each patient, vessels measuring greater than 1 mm were counted and divided into four sections of the lower abdominal wall. RESULTS: The mean number of perforator vessels was 10.6 in the study group and 11.4 in the control group, which was not statistically different (P=0.575). Pfannenstiel incisions with history of repeat caesarian sections were not associated with decreased number of perforator vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Pfannenstiel scars are associated with neither a change in the number of DIEP vessels nor decreased viability of a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and DIEP flap. Lower abdominal free flaps based on DIEP vessels appear safe even in patients who have had multiple caesarian sections through Pfannenstiel incisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4179359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41793592014-09-30 The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Park, Young Jin Kim, Eun Key Yun, Ji Young Eom, Jin Sup Lee, Taik Jong Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall free flaps are used most frequently in autologous breast reconstruction, and these flaps require intact and robust deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) vessels. Pfannenstiel incisions are often present during preoperative visits for breast reconstruction and could potentially signal compromised blood supply to the lower abdominal wall. In this study, we compared the number of DIEP vessels between patients with and without Pfannenstiel incisions undergoing autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed for patients with (study) and without (control) Pfannelstiel incisions (n=34 for each group) between June 2010 and July 2013. In addition to patient demographics, number of caesarian sections, and outcomes of free flap reconstruction, abdominal wall vasculature was compared using the preoperative computed tomography angiographic data between the groups. For each patient, vessels measuring greater than 1 mm were counted and divided into four sections of the lower abdominal wall. RESULTS: The mean number of perforator vessels was 10.6 in the study group and 11.4 in the control group, which was not statistically different (P=0.575). Pfannenstiel incisions with history of repeat caesarian sections were not associated with decreased number of perforator vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Pfannenstiel scars are associated with neither a change in the number of DIEP vessels nor decreased viability of a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and DIEP flap. Lower abdominal free flaps based on DIEP vessels appear safe even in patients who have had multiple caesarian sections through Pfannenstiel incisions. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-09 2014-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4179359/ /pubmed/25276647 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.542 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Young Jin
Kim, Eun Key
Yun, Ji Young
Eom, Jin Sup
Lee, Taik Jong
The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator
title The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator
title_full The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator
title_fullStr The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator
title_short The Influence of Pfannenstiel Incision Scarring on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator
title_sort influence of pfannenstiel incision scarring on deep inferior epigastric perforator
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276647
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.542
work_keys_str_mv AT parkyoungjin theinfluenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT kimeunkey theinfluenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT yunjiyoung theinfluenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT eomjinsup theinfluenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT leetaikjong theinfluenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT parkyoungjin influenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT kimeunkey influenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT yunjiyoung influenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT eomjinsup influenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator
AT leetaikjong influenceofpfannenstielincisionscarringondeepinferiorepigastricperforator