Cargando…
Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap
BACKGROUND: Nipple reconstruction following breast mound reconstruction is the final step in breast reconstruction. Although nipple reconstruction is a simple surgery, the psychological aspects of nipple reconstruction are thought to be important. Nipple projection is a key factor in determining pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276648 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.550 |
_version_ | 1782337069542014976 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Jung Dug Ryu, Jeong Yeop Ryu, Dong Wan Kwon, O Hyun Bae, Sung Gun Lee, Jeong Woo Choi, Kang Young Chung, Ho Yun Cho, Byung Chae |
author_facet | Yang, Jung Dug Ryu, Jeong Yeop Ryu, Dong Wan Kwon, O Hyun Bae, Sung Gun Lee, Jeong Woo Choi, Kang Young Chung, Ho Yun Cho, Byung Chae |
author_sort | Yang, Jung Dug |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nipple reconstruction following breast mound reconstruction is the final step in breast reconstruction. Although nipple reconstruction is a simple surgery, the psychological aspects of nipple reconstruction are thought to be important. Nipple projection is a key factor in determining patient satisfaction with the surgery. In the present study, the Hammond flap technique was introduced for nipple reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty-six patients who had undergone breast reconstruction from February 2008 to March 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were evaluated based on preoperative photos, and their nipple diameters and heights were measured. Postoperative evaluation was conducted 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following nipple reconstruction. A questionnaire on patient satisfaction with the nipple reconstruction was administered 12 months after nipple reconstruction. Moreover, the same plastic surgeon scored nipple projection and overall cosmetic result of the new nipple. RESULTS: The mean projection was 4.4 mm (range, 3-6 mm), and it well matched the contralateral nipple. Twelve months following nipple reconstruction, the mean reduction rate in the nipple projection was 43.6%. Patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the nipple projection and the overall cosmetic result in 80.7% cases. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, compared with other techniques, the use of the Hammond flap technique in nipple reconstruction showed competitive results with regard to nipple projection and patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4179360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41793602014-09-30 Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap Yang, Jung Dug Ryu, Jeong Yeop Ryu, Dong Wan Kwon, O Hyun Bae, Sung Gun Lee, Jeong Woo Choi, Kang Young Chung, Ho Yun Cho, Byung Chae Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Nipple reconstruction following breast mound reconstruction is the final step in breast reconstruction. Although nipple reconstruction is a simple surgery, the psychological aspects of nipple reconstruction are thought to be important. Nipple projection is a key factor in determining patient satisfaction with the surgery. In the present study, the Hammond flap technique was introduced for nipple reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty-six patients who had undergone breast reconstruction from February 2008 to March 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were evaluated based on preoperative photos, and their nipple diameters and heights were measured. Postoperative evaluation was conducted 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following nipple reconstruction. A questionnaire on patient satisfaction with the nipple reconstruction was administered 12 months after nipple reconstruction. Moreover, the same plastic surgeon scored nipple projection and overall cosmetic result of the new nipple. RESULTS: The mean projection was 4.4 mm (range, 3-6 mm), and it well matched the contralateral nipple. Twelve months following nipple reconstruction, the mean reduction rate in the nipple projection was 43.6%. Patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the nipple projection and the overall cosmetic result in 80.7% cases. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, compared with other techniques, the use of the Hammond flap technique in nipple reconstruction showed competitive results with regard to nipple projection and patient satisfaction. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-09 2014-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4179360/ /pubmed/25276648 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.550 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Jung Dug Ryu, Jeong Yeop Ryu, Dong Wan Kwon, O Hyun Bae, Sung Gun Lee, Jeong Woo Choi, Kang Young Chung, Ho Yun Cho, Byung Chae Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap |
title | Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap |
title_full | Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap |
title_fullStr | Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap |
title_full_unstemmed | Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap |
title_short | Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap |
title_sort | our experiences in nipple reconstruction using the hammond flap |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276648 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjungdug ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT ryujeongyeop ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT ryudongwan ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT kwonohyun ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT baesunggun ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT leejeongwoo ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT choikangyoung ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT chunghoyun ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap AT chobyungchae ourexperiencesinnipplereconstructionusingthehammondflap |