Cargando…

Risk of bias in industry-funded oseltamivir trials: comparison of core reports versus full clinical study reports

BACKGROUND: The Cochrane risk of bias tool is a prominent instrument used to evaluate potential biases in clinical trials. In three updates of our Cochrane review on neuraminidase inhibitors, we assessed risk of bias on the same trials using different levels of detail: the trials in journal publicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jefferson, Tom, Jones, Mark A, Doshi, Peter, Del Mar, Chris B, Hama, Rokuro, Thompson, Matthew J, Onakpoya, Igho, Heneghan, Carl J
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:	Evidence Based Practice
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25270852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005253

Ejemplares similares

Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports
por: Doshi, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effectiveness, safety and costs of orphan drugs: an evidence-based review
por: Onakpoya, Igho J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Benefits and harms of pregabalin in the management of neuropathic pain: a rapid review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
por: Onakpoya, Igho J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments
por: Jefferson, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The clinical relevance and newsworthiness of NIHR HTA-funded research: a cohort study
por: Wright, D, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Failure to address potential bias in non-randomised controlled clinical trials may cause lack of evidence on patient-reported outcomes: a method study
por: Peinemann, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: a cohort study
por: Turner, S, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Douet, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses
por: Garcia-Alamino, Josep M, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Development of a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (COMBINE): study protocol
por: Miller, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Promotion or education: a content analysis of industry-authored oral health educational materials targeted at acute care nurses
por: Grundy, Quinn, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set
por: Young, Amber, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review
por: de Barra, Mícheál, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol
por: Li, Guowei, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Patient, physiotherapist and surgeon endorsement of the core domain set for total hip and total knee replacement in Germany: a study protocol for an OMERACT initiative
por: Prill, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review
por: Cho, Yongil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis
por: Yang, Nan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study
por: Zuñiga-Hernandez, Jorge Alberto, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Intertester reliability of clinical shoulder instability and laxity tests in subjects with and without self-reported shoulder problems
por: Eshoj, Henrik, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Extending the RIGHT statement for reporting adapted practice guidelines in healthcare: the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist protocol
por: Song, Yang, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Byrne, David, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review
por: Sobieraj, Diana M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The mechanisms of delayed onset type adverse reactions to oseltamivir
por: Hama, Rokuro
Publicado: (2016)

Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
por: Hao, Qiukui, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting dose in complex self-management support interventions for long-term conditions: is it defined by researchers and received by participants? A systematic review
por: Rookes, Tasmin Alanna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Outcome reporting from clinical trials of non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with traditional Chinese medicine or Western medicine: a systematic review
por: Qiu, Ruijin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities
por: Bachelet, Vivienne C, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

From registration, protocol to report: are COVID-19-related RCTs in mainland China consistent? A systematic review of clinical trial registry and literature
por: Chen, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based antibiotic prescription guidelines in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework
por: Bursey, Krystal, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Secondary analysis of a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to facilitate knowledge translation in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): insights from AO Spine RECODE-DCM
por: Davies, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children
por: Jefferson, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Healthcare use and costs associated with obesity in Badalona, Spain: a study protocol
por: Sicras-Mainar, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

CareTrack Australia: assessing the appropriateness of adult healthcare: protocol for a retrospective medical record review
por: Hunt, Tamara D, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
por: Willems, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
por: Fletcher, Ben, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_n15qkhac0uu7sum2sncvuqm1t7