Cargando…

Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations

OBJECTIVE: The underutilisation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is still a problem in the UK despite the emergence of national guidelines and incentives to increase the number of patients undergoing VTE risk assessments. Our objective was to examine the reasons doctors gave for not presc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nwulu, Ugochi, Brooks, Hannah, Richardson, Suzanna, McFarland, Lorraine, Coleman, Jamie J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005647
_version_ 1782337080493342720
author Nwulu, Ugochi
Brooks, Hannah
Richardson, Suzanna
McFarland, Lorraine
Coleman, Jamie J
author_facet Nwulu, Ugochi
Brooks, Hannah
Richardson, Suzanna
McFarland, Lorraine
Coleman, Jamie J
author_sort Nwulu, Ugochi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The underutilisation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is still a problem in the UK despite the emergence of national guidelines and incentives to increase the number of patients undergoing VTE risk assessments. Our objective was to examine the reasons doctors gave for not prescribing enoxaparin when recommended by an electronic VTE risk assessment alert. DESIGN: We used a qualitative research design to conduct a thematic analysis of free text entered into an electronic prescribing system. SETTING: The study took place in a large University teaching hospital, which has a locally developed electronic prescribing system known as PICS (Prescribing, Information and Communication System). PARTICIPANTS: We extracted prescription data from all inpatient admissions over a 7-month period in 2012 using the audit database of PICS. INTERVENTION: The completion of the VTE risk assessment form introduced into the hospital-wide electronic prescribing and health records system is mandatory. Where doctors do not prescribe VTE prophylaxis when recommended, they are asked to provide a reason for this decision. The free-text field was introduced in May 2012. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Free-text reasons for not prescribing enoxaparin when recommended were thematically coded. RESULTS: A total of 1136 free-text responses from 259 doctors were collected in the time period and 1206 separate reasons were analysed and coded. 389 reasons (32.3%) for not prescribing enoxaparin were coded as being due to ‘clinical judgment’; in 288 (23.9%) of the responses, doctors were going to reassess the patient or prescribe enoxaparin; and in 245 responses (20.3%), the system was seen to have produced an inappropriate alert. CONCLUSIONS: In order to increase specificity of warnings and avoid users developing alert fatigue, it is essential that an evaluation of user responses and/or end user feedback as to the appropriateness and timing of alerts is obtained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4179407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41794072014-10-02 Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations Nwulu, Ugochi Brooks, Hannah Richardson, Suzanna McFarland, Lorraine Coleman, Jamie J BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The underutilisation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is still a problem in the UK despite the emergence of national guidelines and incentives to increase the number of patients undergoing VTE risk assessments. Our objective was to examine the reasons doctors gave for not prescribing enoxaparin when recommended by an electronic VTE risk assessment alert. DESIGN: We used a qualitative research design to conduct a thematic analysis of free text entered into an electronic prescribing system. SETTING: The study took place in a large University teaching hospital, which has a locally developed electronic prescribing system known as PICS (Prescribing, Information and Communication System). PARTICIPANTS: We extracted prescription data from all inpatient admissions over a 7-month period in 2012 using the audit database of PICS. INTERVENTION: The completion of the VTE risk assessment form introduced into the hospital-wide electronic prescribing and health records system is mandatory. Where doctors do not prescribe VTE prophylaxis when recommended, they are asked to provide a reason for this decision. The free-text field was introduced in May 2012. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Free-text reasons for not prescribing enoxaparin when recommended were thematically coded. RESULTS: A total of 1136 free-text responses from 259 doctors were collected in the time period and 1206 separate reasons were analysed and coded. 389 reasons (32.3%) for not prescribing enoxaparin were coded as being due to ‘clinical judgment’; in 288 (23.9%) of the responses, doctors were going to reassess the patient or prescribe enoxaparin; and in 245 responses (20.3%), the system was seen to have produced an inappropriate alert. CONCLUSIONS: In order to increase specificity of warnings and avoid users developing alert fatigue, it is essential that an evaluation of user responses and/or end user feedback as to the appropriateness and timing of alerts is obtained. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4179407/ /pubmed/25260369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005647 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Nwulu, Ugochi
Brooks, Hannah
Richardson, Suzanna
McFarland, Lorraine
Coleman, Jamie J
Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
title Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
title_full Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
title_fullStr Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
title_short Electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
title_sort electronic risk assessment for venous thromboembolism: investigating physicians’ rationale for bypassing clinical decision support recommendations
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005647
work_keys_str_mv AT nwuluugochi electronicriskassessmentforvenousthromboembolisminvestigatingphysiciansrationaleforbypassingclinicaldecisionsupportrecommendations
AT brookshannah electronicriskassessmentforvenousthromboembolisminvestigatingphysiciansrationaleforbypassingclinicaldecisionsupportrecommendations
AT richardsonsuzanna electronicriskassessmentforvenousthromboembolisminvestigatingphysiciansrationaleforbypassingclinicaldecisionsupportrecommendations
AT mcfarlandlorraine electronicriskassessmentforvenousthromboembolisminvestigatingphysiciansrationaleforbypassingclinicaldecisionsupportrecommendations
AT colemanjamiej electronicriskassessmentforvenousthromboembolisminvestigatingphysiciansrationaleforbypassingclinicaldecisionsupportrecommendations