Cargando…

Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort

BACKGROUND: The importance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stenting of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) remains controversial and has not been fully studied in the subset of patients with ULMCA. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of IVUS-guided stenting using a drug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Xiao-Fei, Kan, Jing, Zhang, Yao-Jun, Zhang, Jun-Jie, Tian, Nai-Liang, Ye, Fei, Ge, Zhen, Xiao, Ping-Xi, Chen, Feng, Mintz, Gary, Chen, Shao-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278749
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S65768
_version_ 1782337148300558336
author Gao, Xiao-Fei
Kan, Jing
Zhang, Yao-Jun
Zhang, Jun-Jie
Tian, Nai-Liang
Ye, Fei
Ge, Zhen
Xiao, Ping-Xi
Chen, Feng
Mintz, Gary
Chen, Shao-Liang
author_facet Gao, Xiao-Fei
Kan, Jing
Zhang, Yao-Jun
Zhang, Jun-Jie
Tian, Nai-Liang
Ye, Fei
Ge, Zhen
Xiao, Ping-Xi
Chen, Feng
Mintz, Gary
Chen, Shao-Liang
author_sort Gao, Xiao-Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The importance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stenting of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) remains controversial and has not been fully studied in the subset of patients with ULMCA. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of IVUS-guided stenting using a drug-eluting stent for ULMCA. METHODS: A total of 1,016 consecutive patients with ULMCA stenosis who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation from January 2006 to December 2011 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint of this nonrandomized registry was the rate of one-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Stent thrombosis served as the safety endpoint. Propensity score matching was used to calculate the adjusted event rate. RESULTS: The unadjusted one-year MACE rate was 14.8% in the IVUS-guided group (n=337, 33.2%), significantly different from the 27.7% (P<0.001) in the angiography-guided group (n=679, 66.8%). After propensity score matching, 291 paired patients were matched between the two groups, and the difference in one-year MACE between IVUS-guided (16.2%) versus angiography-guided (24.4%) groups was still significant (P=0.014), mainly driven by decreased rates of cardiac death (1.7%) and target vessel revascularization (3.4%) in the IVUS-guided group when compared with 5.2% (P=0.023) and 10.0% (P=0.002) in the angiography-guided group, respectively. Although it did not reach significance (P=0.075), the adjusted one-year rate of stent thrombosis in the angiography-guided group was higher than in the IVUS-guided group. CONCLUSION: Compared with angiography guidance, IVUS-guided treatment of ULMCA using a drug-eluting stent was associated with a significant reduction of one-year cardiac death and target vessel revascularization, resulting in less frequent one-year MACE after propensity score matching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4179827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41798272014-10-02 Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort Gao, Xiao-Fei Kan, Jing Zhang, Yao-Jun Zhang, Jun-Jie Tian, Nai-Liang Ye, Fei Ge, Zhen Xiao, Ping-Xi Chen, Feng Mintz, Gary Chen, Shao-Liang Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: The importance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stenting of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) remains controversial and has not been fully studied in the subset of patients with ULMCA. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of IVUS-guided stenting using a drug-eluting stent for ULMCA. METHODS: A total of 1,016 consecutive patients with ULMCA stenosis who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation from January 2006 to December 2011 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint of this nonrandomized registry was the rate of one-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Stent thrombosis served as the safety endpoint. Propensity score matching was used to calculate the adjusted event rate. RESULTS: The unadjusted one-year MACE rate was 14.8% in the IVUS-guided group (n=337, 33.2%), significantly different from the 27.7% (P<0.001) in the angiography-guided group (n=679, 66.8%). After propensity score matching, 291 paired patients were matched between the two groups, and the difference in one-year MACE between IVUS-guided (16.2%) versus angiography-guided (24.4%) groups was still significant (P=0.014), mainly driven by decreased rates of cardiac death (1.7%) and target vessel revascularization (3.4%) in the IVUS-guided group when compared with 5.2% (P=0.023) and 10.0% (P=0.002) in the angiography-guided group, respectively. Although it did not reach significance (P=0.075), the adjusted one-year rate of stent thrombosis in the angiography-guided group was higher than in the IVUS-guided group. CONCLUSION: Compared with angiography guidance, IVUS-guided treatment of ULMCA using a drug-eluting stent was associated with a significant reduction of one-year cardiac death and target vessel revascularization, resulting in less frequent one-year MACE after propensity score matching. Dove Medical Press 2014-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4179827/ /pubmed/25278749 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S65768 Text en © 2014 Gao et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gao, Xiao-Fei
Kan, Jing
Zhang, Yao-Jun
Zhang, Jun-Jie
Tian, Nai-Liang
Ye, Fei
Ge, Zhen
Xiao, Ping-Xi
Chen, Feng
Mintz, Gary
Chen, Shao-Liang
Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
title Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
title_full Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
title_fullStr Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
title_short Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
title_sort comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4179827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278749
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S65768
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoxiaofei comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT kanjing comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT zhangyaojun comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT zhangjunjie comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT tiannailiang comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT yefei comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT gezhen comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT xiaopingxi comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT chenfeng comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT mintzgary comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort
AT chenshaoliang comparisonofoneyearclinicaloutcomesbetweenintravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedimplantationofdrugelutingstentsforleftmainlesionsasinglecenteranalysisofa1016patientcohort