Cargando…

Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study

Objective To evaluate the potential impact of two alcohol control policies under consideration in England: banning below cost selling of alcohol and minimum unit pricing. Design Modelling study using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 2.5. Setting England 2014-15. Population Adults and young...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brennan, Alan, Meng, Yang, Holmes, John, Hill-McManus, Daniel, Meier, Petra S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25270743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5452
_version_ 1782337202704875520
author Brennan, Alan
Meng, Yang
Holmes, John
Hill-McManus, Daniel
Meier, Petra S
author_facet Brennan, Alan
Meng, Yang
Holmes, John
Hill-McManus, Daniel
Meier, Petra S
author_sort Brennan, Alan
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the potential impact of two alcohol control policies under consideration in England: banning below cost selling of alcohol and minimum unit pricing. Design Modelling study using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 2.5. Setting England 2014-15. Population Adults and young people aged 16 or more, including subgroups of moderate, hazardous, and harmful drinkers. Interventions Policy to ban below cost selling, which means that the selling price to consumers could not be lower than tax payable on the product, compared with policies of minimum unit pricing at £0.40 (€0.57; $0.75), 45p, and 50p per unit (7.9 g/10 mL) of pure alcohol. Main outcome measures Changes in mean consumption in terms of units of alcohol, drinkers’ expenditure, and reductions in deaths, illnesses, admissions to hospital, and quality adjusted life years. Results The proportion of the market affected is a key driver of impact, with just 0.7% of all units estimated to be sold below the duty plus value added tax threshold implied by a ban on below cost selling, compared with 23.2% of units for a 45p minimum unit price. Below cost selling is estimated to reduce harmful drinkers’ mean annual consumption by just 0.08%, around 3 units per year, compared with 3.7% or 137 units per year for a 45p minimum unit price (an approximately 45 times greater effect). The ban on below cost selling has a small effect on population health—saving an estimated 14 deaths and 500 admissions to hospital per annum. In contrast, a 45p minimum unit price is estimated to save 624 deaths and 23 700 hospital admissions. Most of the harm reductions (for example, 89% of estimated deaths saved per annum) are estimated to occur in the 5.3% of people who are harmful drinkers. Conclusions The ban on below cost selling, implemented in the England in May 2014, is estimated to have small effects on consumption and health harm. The previously announced policy of a minimum unit price, if set at expected levels between 40p and 50p per unit, is estimated to have an approximately 40-50 times greater effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4180296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41802962014-10-06 Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study Brennan, Alan Meng, Yang Holmes, John Hill-McManus, Daniel Meier, Petra S BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the potential impact of two alcohol control policies under consideration in England: banning below cost selling of alcohol and minimum unit pricing. Design Modelling study using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 2.5. Setting England 2014-15. Population Adults and young people aged 16 or more, including subgroups of moderate, hazardous, and harmful drinkers. Interventions Policy to ban below cost selling, which means that the selling price to consumers could not be lower than tax payable on the product, compared with policies of minimum unit pricing at £0.40 (€0.57; $0.75), 45p, and 50p per unit (7.9 g/10 mL) of pure alcohol. Main outcome measures Changes in mean consumption in terms of units of alcohol, drinkers’ expenditure, and reductions in deaths, illnesses, admissions to hospital, and quality adjusted life years. Results The proportion of the market affected is a key driver of impact, with just 0.7% of all units estimated to be sold below the duty plus value added tax threshold implied by a ban on below cost selling, compared with 23.2% of units for a 45p minimum unit price. Below cost selling is estimated to reduce harmful drinkers’ mean annual consumption by just 0.08%, around 3 units per year, compared with 3.7% or 137 units per year for a 45p minimum unit price (an approximately 45 times greater effect). The ban on below cost selling has a small effect on population health—saving an estimated 14 deaths and 500 admissions to hospital per annum. In contrast, a 45p minimum unit price is estimated to save 624 deaths and 23 700 hospital admissions. Most of the harm reductions (for example, 89% of estimated deaths saved per annum) are estimated to occur in the 5.3% of people who are harmful drinkers. Conclusions The ban on below cost selling, implemented in the England in May 2014, is estimated to have small effects on consumption and health harm. The previously announced policy of a minimum unit price, if set at expected levels between 40p and 50p per unit, is estimated to have an approximately 40-50 times greater effect. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4180296/ /pubmed/25270743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5452 Text en © Brennan et al 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Brennan, Alan
Meng, Yang
Holmes, John
Hill-McManus, Daniel
Meier, Petra S
Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study
title Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study
title_full Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study
title_fullStr Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study
title_short Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study
title_sort potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in england 2014: modelling study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25270743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5452
work_keys_str_mv AT brennanalan potentialbenefitsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholversusabanonbelowcostsellinginengland2014modellingstudy
AT mengyang potentialbenefitsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholversusabanonbelowcostsellinginengland2014modellingstudy
AT holmesjohn potentialbenefitsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholversusabanonbelowcostsellinginengland2014modellingstudy
AT hillmcmanusdaniel potentialbenefitsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholversusabanonbelowcostsellinginengland2014modellingstudy
AT meierpetras potentialbenefitsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholversusabanonbelowcostsellinginengland2014modellingstudy