Cargando…
Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The frequency of malpositioning of gastric tubes in the trachea has been reported to be 0.3–15%, which may cause severe complications, such as pneumonia, if not detected promptly. If a gastric tube can be guided into the esophagus under direct vision with a video laryngoscope, misplaceme...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-82 |
_version_ | 1782337291198398464 |
---|---|
author | Okabe, Tadashi Goto, Gentaro Hori, Yoko Sakamoto, Atsuhiro |
author_facet | Okabe, Tadashi Goto, Gentaro Hori, Yoko Sakamoto, Atsuhiro |
author_sort | Okabe, Tadashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The frequency of malpositioning of gastric tubes in the trachea has been reported to be 0.3–15%, which may cause severe complications, such as pneumonia, if not detected promptly. If a gastric tube can be guided into the esophagus under direct vision with a video laryngoscope, misplacement of the gastric tube into the trachea can be avoided. We compared gastric tube insertion under direct vision using a video laryngoscope with the conventional method of blind insertion. METHODS: We enrolled 60 patients who required a transnasal gastric tube to facilitate elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. The participants were recruited consecutively into one of two groups, a group of 30 patients in whom a gastric tube was inserted using a King Vision™ video laryngoscope (KV group), and a group of 30 patients who underwent conventional blind insertion of the gastric tube (Blind group). The success rate, the time taken to insert the gastric tube, and the incidence of complications were compared. RESULTS: In the KV group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 52.5 ± 17.1 seconds, with a success rate of 100%. Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants and slight epistaxis in one participant. In the Blind group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 65.9 ± 39.9 seconds, with a success rate of 90% (27 out of 30 patients). Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants, slight epistaxis occurred in two participants, and tracheal malposition occurred in one participant but was detected promptly and corrected using the video laryngoscope. There were no significant differences in the time required for placing the gastric tube, the success rate, or the incidence of complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric tube insertion using a King Vision video laryngoscope was straightforward, and was particularly useful for detecting and correcting tracheal malpositioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry number: UMIN000011014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4180947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41809472014-10-03 Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial Okabe, Tadashi Goto, Gentaro Hori, Yoko Sakamoto, Atsuhiro BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The frequency of malpositioning of gastric tubes in the trachea has been reported to be 0.3–15%, which may cause severe complications, such as pneumonia, if not detected promptly. If a gastric tube can be guided into the esophagus under direct vision with a video laryngoscope, misplacement of the gastric tube into the trachea can be avoided. We compared gastric tube insertion under direct vision using a video laryngoscope with the conventional method of blind insertion. METHODS: We enrolled 60 patients who required a transnasal gastric tube to facilitate elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. The participants were recruited consecutively into one of two groups, a group of 30 patients in whom a gastric tube was inserted using a King Vision™ video laryngoscope (KV group), and a group of 30 patients who underwent conventional blind insertion of the gastric tube (Blind group). The success rate, the time taken to insert the gastric tube, and the incidence of complications were compared. RESULTS: In the KV group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 52.5 ± 17.1 seconds, with a success rate of 100%. Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants and slight epistaxis in one participant. In the Blind group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 65.9 ± 39.9 seconds, with a success rate of 90% (27 out of 30 patients). Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants, slight epistaxis occurred in two participants, and tracheal malposition occurred in one participant but was detected promptly and corrected using the video laryngoscope. There were no significant differences in the time required for placing the gastric tube, the success rate, or the incidence of complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric tube insertion using a King Vision video laryngoscope was straightforward, and was particularly useful for detecting and correcting tracheal malpositioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry number: UMIN000011014. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4180947/ /pubmed/25278810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-82 Text en Copyright © 2014 Okabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Okabe, Tadashi Goto, Gentaro Hori, Yoko Sakamoto, Atsuhiro Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
title | Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
title_full | Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
title_short | Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
title_sort | gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the king vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-82 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okabetadashi gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT gotogentaro gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT horiyoko gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT sakamotoatsuhiro gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial |