Cargando…

Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The frequency of malpositioning of gastric tubes in the trachea has been reported to be 0.3–15%, which may cause severe complications, such as pneumonia, if not detected promptly. If a gastric tube can be guided into the esophagus under direct vision with a video laryngoscope, misplaceme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okabe, Tadashi, Goto, Gentaro, Hori, Yoko, Sakamoto, Atsuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-82
_version_ 1782337291198398464
author Okabe, Tadashi
Goto, Gentaro
Hori, Yoko
Sakamoto, Atsuhiro
author_facet Okabe, Tadashi
Goto, Gentaro
Hori, Yoko
Sakamoto, Atsuhiro
author_sort Okabe, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The frequency of malpositioning of gastric tubes in the trachea has been reported to be 0.3–15%, which may cause severe complications, such as pneumonia, if not detected promptly. If a gastric tube can be guided into the esophagus under direct vision with a video laryngoscope, misplacement of the gastric tube into the trachea can be avoided. We compared gastric tube insertion under direct vision using a video laryngoscope with the conventional method of blind insertion. METHODS: We enrolled 60 patients who required a transnasal gastric tube to facilitate elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. The participants were recruited consecutively into one of two groups, a group of 30 patients in whom a gastric tube was inserted using a King Vision™ video laryngoscope (KV group), and a group of 30 patients who underwent conventional blind insertion of the gastric tube (Blind group). The success rate, the time taken to insert the gastric tube, and the incidence of complications were compared. RESULTS: In the KV group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 52.5 ± 17.1 seconds, with a success rate of 100%. Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants and slight epistaxis in one participant. In the Blind group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 65.9 ± 39.9 seconds, with a success rate of 90% (27 out of 30 patients). Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants, slight epistaxis occurred in two participants, and tracheal malposition occurred in one participant but was detected promptly and corrected using the video laryngoscope. There were no significant differences in the time required for placing the gastric tube, the success rate, or the incidence of complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric tube insertion using a King Vision video laryngoscope was straightforward, and was particularly useful for detecting and correcting tracheal malpositioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry number: UMIN000011014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4180947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41809472014-10-03 Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial Okabe, Tadashi Goto, Gentaro Hori, Yoko Sakamoto, Atsuhiro BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The frequency of malpositioning of gastric tubes in the trachea has been reported to be 0.3–15%, which may cause severe complications, such as pneumonia, if not detected promptly. If a gastric tube can be guided into the esophagus under direct vision with a video laryngoscope, misplacement of the gastric tube into the trachea can be avoided. We compared gastric tube insertion under direct vision using a video laryngoscope with the conventional method of blind insertion. METHODS: We enrolled 60 patients who required a transnasal gastric tube to facilitate elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. The participants were recruited consecutively into one of two groups, a group of 30 patients in whom a gastric tube was inserted using a King Vision™ video laryngoscope (KV group), and a group of 30 patients who underwent conventional blind insertion of the gastric tube (Blind group). The success rate, the time taken to insert the gastric tube, and the incidence of complications were compared. RESULTS: In the KV group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 52.5 ± 17.1 seconds, with a success rate of 100%. Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants and slight epistaxis in one participant. In the Blind group, the time required for gastric tube placement was 65.9 ± 39.9 seconds, with a success rate of 90% (27 out of 30 patients). Slight oral hemorrhage occurred in two participants, slight epistaxis occurred in two participants, and tracheal malposition occurred in one participant but was detected promptly and corrected using the video laryngoscope. There were no significant differences in the time required for placing the gastric tube, the success rate, or the incidence of complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric tube insertion using a King Vision video laryngoscope was straightforward, and was particularly useful for detecting and correcting tracheal malpositioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry number: UMIN000011014. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4180947/ /pubmed/25278810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-82 Text en Copyright © 2014 Okabe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Okabe, Tadashi
Goto, Gentaro
Hori, Yoko
Sakamoto, Atsuhiro
Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
title Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
title_full Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
title_fullStr Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
title_short Gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the King Vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
title_sort gastric tube insertion under direct vision using the king vision™ video laryngoscope: a randomized, prospective, clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-82
work_keys_str_mv AT okabetadashi gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT gotogentaro gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT horiyoko gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sakamotoatsuhiro gastrictubeinsertionunderdirectvisionusingthekingvisionvideolaryngoscopearandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial