Cargando…
Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
BACKGROUND: Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by reg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1 |
_version_ | 1782337294626193408 |
---|---|
author | Ibn-Salem, Jonas Köhler, Sebastian Love, Michael I Chung, Ho-Ryun Huang, Ni Hurles, Matthew E Haendel, Melissa Washington, Nicole L Smedley, Damian Mungall, Christopher J Lewis, Suzanna E Ott, Claus-Eric Bauer, Sebastian Schofield, Paul N Mundlos, Stefan Spielmann, Malte Robinson, Peter N |
author_facet | Ibn-Salem, Jonas Köhler, Sebastian Love, Michael I Chung, Ho-Ryun Huang, Ni Hurles, Matthew E Haendel, Melissa Washington, Nicole L Smedley, Damian Mungall, Christopher J Lewis, Suzanna E Ott, Claus-Eric Bauer, Sebastian Schofield, Paul N Mundlos, Stefan Spielmann, Malte Robinson, Peter N |
author_sort | Ibn-Salem, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by regulatory boundary elements or barriers. Copy-number variations can potentially alter the topological domain architecture by deleting or duplicating the barriers and thereby allowing enhancers from neighboring domains to ectopically activate genes causing misexpression and disease, a mutational mechanism that has recently been termed enhancer adoption. RESULTS: We use the Human Phenotype Ontology database to relate the phenotypes of 922 deletion cases recorded in the DECIPHER database to monogenic diseases associated with genes in or adjacent to the deletions. We identify combinations of tissue-specific enhancers and genes adjacent to the deletion and associated with phenotypes in the corresponding tissue, whereby the phenotype matched that observed in the deletion. We compare this computationally with a gene-dosage pathomechanism that attempts to explain the deletion phenotype based on haploinsufficiency of genes located within the deletions. Up to 11.8% of the deletions could be best explained by enhancer adoption or a combination of enhancer adoption and gene-dosage effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enhancer adoption caused by deletions of regulatory boundaries may contribute to a substantial minority of copy-number variation phenotypes and should thus be taken into account in their medical interpretation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4180961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41809612014-10-14 Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease Ibn-Salem, Jonas Köhler, Sebastian Love, Michael I Chung, Ho-Ryun Huang, Ni Hurles, Matthew E Haendel, Melissa Washington, Nicole L Smedley, Damian Mungall, Christopher J Lewis, Suzanna E Ott, Claus-Eric Bauer, Sebastian Schofield, Paul N Mundlos, Stefan Spielmann, Malte Robinson, Peter N Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by regulatory boundary elements or barriers. Copy-number variations can potentially alter the topological domain architecture by deleting or duplicating the barriers and thereby allowing enhancers from neighboring domains to ectopically activate genes causing misexpression and disease, a mutational mechanism that has recently been termed enhancer adoption. RESULTS: We use the Human Phenotype Ontology database to relate the phenotypes of 922 deletion cases recorded in the DECIPHER database to monogenic diseases associated with genes in or adjacent to the deletions. We identify combinations of tissue-specific enhancers and genes adjacent to the deletion and associated with phenotypes in the corresponding tissue, whereby the phenotype matched that observed in the deletion. We compare this computationally with a gene-dosage pathomechanism that attempts to explain the deletion phenotype based on haploinsufficiency of genes located within the deletions. Up to 11.8% of the deletions could be best explained by enhancer adoption or a combination of enhancer adoption and gene-dosage effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enhancer adoption caused by deletions of regulatory boundaries may contribute to a substantial minority of copy-number variation phenotypes and should thus be taken into account in their medical interpretation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-04 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4180961/ /pubmed/25315429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1 Text en © Ibn-Salem et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ibn-Salem, Jonas Köhler, Sebastian Love, Michael I Chung, Ho-Ryun Huang, Ni Hurles, Matthew E Haendel, Melissa Washington, Nicole L Smedley, Damian Mungall, Christopher J Lewis, Suzanna E Ott, Claus-Eric Bauer, Sebastian Schofield, Paul N Mundlos, Stefan Spielmann, Malte Robinson, Peter N Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
title | Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
title_full | Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
title_fullStr | Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
title_short | Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
title_sort | deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibnsalemjonas deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT kohlersebastian deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT lovemichaeli deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT chunghoryun deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT huangni deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT hurlesmatthewe deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT haendelmelissa deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT washingtonnicolel deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT smedleydamian deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT mungallchristopherj deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT lewissuzannae deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT ottclauseric deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT bauersebastian deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT schofieldpauln deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT mundlosstefan deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT spielmannmalte deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease AT robinsonpetern deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease |