Cargando…

Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease

BACKGROUND: Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibn-Salem, Jonas, Köhler, Sebastian, Love, Michael I, Chung, Ho-Ryun, Huang, Ni, Hurles, Matthew E, Haendel, Melissa, Washington, Nicole L, Smedley, Damian, Mungall, Christopher J, Lewis, Suzanna E, Ott, Claus-Eric, Bauer, Sebastian, Schofield, Paul N, Mundlos, Stefan, Spielmann, Malte, Robinson, Peter N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1
_version_ 1782337294626193408
author Ibn-Salem, Jonas
Köhler, Sebastian
Love, Michael I
Chung, Ho-Ryun
Huang, Ni
Hurles, Matthew E
Haendel, Melissa
Washington, Nicole L
Smedley, Damian
Mungall, Christopher J
Lewis, Suzanna E
Ott, Claus-Eric
Bauer, Sebastian
Schofield, Paul N
Mundlos, Stefan
Spielmann, Malte
Robinson, Peter N
author_facet Ibn-Salem, Jonas
Köhler, Sebastian
Love, Michael I
Chung, Ho-Ryun
Huang, Ni
Hurles, Matthew E
Haendel, Melissa
Washington, Nicole L
Smedley, Damian
Mungall, Christopher J
Lewis, Suzanna E
Ott, Claus-Eric
Bauer, Sebastian
Schofield, Paul N
Mundlos, Stefan
Spielmann, Malte
Robinson, Peter N
author_sort Ibn-Salem, Jonas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by regulatory boundary elements or barriers. Copy-number variations can potentially alter the topological domain architecture by deleting or duplicating the barriers and thereby allowing enhancers from neighboring domains to ectopically activate genes causing misexpression and disease, a mutational mechanism that has recently been termed enhancer adoption. RESULTS: We use the Human Phenotype Ontology database to relate the phenotypes of 922 deletion cases recorded in the DECIPHER database to monogenic diseases associated with genes in or adjacent to the deletions. We identify combinations of tissue-specific enhancers and genes adjacent to the deletion and associated with phenotypes in the corresponding tissue, whereby the phenotype matched that observed in the deletion. We compare this computationally with a gene-dosage pathomechanism that attempts to explain the deletion phenotype based on haploinsufficiency of genes located within the deletions. Up to 11.8% of the deletions could be best explained by enhancer adoption or a combination of enhancer adoption and gene-dosage effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enhancer adoption caused by deletions of regulatory boundaries may contribute to a substantial minority of copy-number variation phenotypes and should thus be taken into account in their medical interpretation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4180961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41809612014-10-14 Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease Ibn-Salem, Jonas Köhler, Sebastian Love, Michael I Chung, Ho-Ryun Huang, Ni Hurles, Matthew E Haendel, Melissa Washington, Nicole L Smedley, Damian Mungall, Christopher J Lewis, Suzanna E Ott, Claus-Eric Bauer, Sebastian Schofield, Paul N Mundlos, Stefan Spielmann, Malte Robinson, Peter N Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by regulatory boundary elements or barriers. Copy-number variations can potentially alter the topological domain architecture by deleting or duplicating the barriers and thereby allowing enhancers from neighboring domains to ectopically activate genes causing misexpression and disease, a mutational mechanism that has recently been termed enhancer adoption. RESULTS: We use the Human Phenotype Ontology database to relate the phenotypes of 922 deletion cases recorded in the DECIPHER database to monogenic diseases associated with genes in or adjacent to the deletions. We identify combinations of tissue-specific enhancers and genes adjacent to the deletion and associated with phenotypes in the corresponding tissue, whereby the phenotype matched that observed in the deletion. We compare this computationally with a gene-dosage pathomechanism that attempts to explain the deletion phenotype based on haploinsufficiency of genes located within the deletions. Up to 11.8% of the deletions could be best explained by enhancer adoption or a combination of enhancer adoption and gene-dosage effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enhancer adoption caused by deletions of regulatory boundaries may contribute to a substantial minority of copy-number variation phenotypes and should thus be taken into account in their medical interpretation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-04 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4180961/ /pubmed/25315429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1 Text en © Ibn-Salem et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ibn-Salem, Jonas
Köhler, Sebastian
Love, Michael I
Chung, Ho-Ryun
Huang, Ni
Hurles, Matthew E
Haendel, Melissa
Washington, Nicole L
Smedley, Damian
Mungall, Christopher J
Lewis, Suzanna E
Ott, Claus-Eric
Bauer, Sebastian
Schofield, Paul N
Mundlos, Stefan
Spielmann, Malte
Robinson, Peter N
Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
title Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
title_full Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
title_fullStr Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
title_full_unstemmed Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
title_short Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
title_sort deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ibnsalemjonas deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT kohlersebastian deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT lovemichaeli deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT chunghoryun deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT huangni deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT hurlesmatthewe deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT haendelmelissa deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT washingtonnicolel deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT smedleydamian deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT mungallchristopherj deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT lewissuzannae deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT ottclauseric deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT bauersebastian deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT schofieldpauln deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT mundlosstefan deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT spielmannmalte deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease
AT robinsonpetern deletionsofchromosomalregulatoryboundariesareassociatedwithcongenitaldisease