Cargando…
The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
BACKGROUND: Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z |
_version_ | 1782337296576544768 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Daniel J Okereke, Ikenna C Birdas, Thomas J Ceppa, DuyKhanh P Rieger, Karen M Kesler, Kenneth A |
author_facet | Weber, Daniel J Okereke, Ikenna C Birdas, Thomas J Ceppa, DuyKhanh P Rieger, Karen M Kesler, Kenneth A |
author_sort | Weber, Daniel J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avoiding a separate thoracotomy with rib spreading. We undertook a study to compare outcomes of this novel "cut-in patch-out" technique with traditional thoracotomy for patients with Pancoast tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 41 patients undergoing surgical resection of Pancoast tumors requiring en-bloc removal of at least 3 ribs at our institution from 1999 to 2012. Surgery was accomplished by either a "cut-in patch-out" technique (n = 25) or traditional posterolateral thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection (n = 16). Multiple variables including patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, extent of resection, and pathology were analyzed with respect to outcomes from morbidity, narcotic use, and oncologic perspectives. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, and perioperative factors including extent of surgery, complete resections (R0), nodal status and lymph node number, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the two groups. The mean duration of out-patient narcotic use was significantly lower in the "cut-in patch-out" group compared to the thoracotomy group (80.6 days ± 62.4 vs. 158.2 days ± 119.2, p < 0.01). Using multivariate regression analysis, the traditional thoracotomy technique (OR 7.72; p = 0.01) was independently associated with prolonged oral narcotic requirements (>100 days). Additionally, five year survival for the "cut-in patch-out" group was 48% versus the traditional group at 12.5% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a traditional thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection approach for P-NSCLC, a "cut-in patch-out" technique offers an alternative approach that appears to have at least oncologic equivalence while decreasing pain. We have more recently adapted this technique to select patients with pulmonary neoplasms involving chest wall invasion and believe further investigation is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4180969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41809692014-10-03 The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study Weber, Daniel J Okereke, Ikenna C Birdas, Thomas J Ceppa, DuyKhanh P Rieger, Karen M Kesler, Kenneth A J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avoiding a separate thoracotomy with rib spreading. We undertook a study to compare outcomes of this novel "cut-in patch-out" technique with traditional thoracotomy for patients with Pancoast tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 41 patients undergoing surgical resection of Pancoast tumors requiring en-bloc removal of at least 3 ribs at our institution from 1999 to 2012. Surgery was accomplished by either a "cut-in patch-out" technique (n = 25) or traditional posterolateral thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection (n = 16). Multiple variables including patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, extent of resection, and pathology were analyzed with respect to outcomes from morbidity, narcotic use, and oncologic perspectives. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, and perioperative factors including extent of surgery, complete resections (R0), nodal status and lymph node number, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the two groups. The mean duration of out-patient narcotic use was significantly lower in the "cut-in patch-out" group compared to the thoracotomy group (80.6 days ± 62.4 vs. 158.2 days ± 119.2, p < 0.01). Using multivariate regression analysis, the traditional thoracotomy technique (OR 7.72; p = 0.01) was independently associated with prolonged oral narcotic requirements (>100 days). Additionally, five year survival for the "cut-in patch-out" group was 48% versus the traditional group at 12.5% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a traditional thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection approach for P-NSCLC, a "cut-in patch-out" technique offers an alternative approach that appears to have at least oncologic equivalence while decreasing pain. We have more recently adapted this technique to select patients with pulmonary neoplasms involving chest wall invasion and believe further investigation is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4180969/ /pubmed/25265907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z Text en © Weber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weber, Daniel J Okereke, Ikenna C Birdas, Thomas J Ceppa, DuyKhanh P Rieger, Karen M Kesler, Kenneth A The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
title | The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
title_full | The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
title_fullStr | The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
title_full_unstemmed | The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
title_short | The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
title_sort | "cut-in patch-out" technique for pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberdanielj thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT okerekeikennac thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT birdasthomasj thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT ceppaduykhanhp thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT riegerkarenm thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT keslerkennetha thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT weberdanielj cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT okerekeikennac cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT birdasthomasj cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT ceppaduykhanhp cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT riegerkarenm cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy AT keslerkennetha cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy |