Cargando…

The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study

BACKGROUND: Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Daniel J, Okereke, Ikenna C, Birdas, Thomas J, Ceppa, DuyKhanh P, Rieger, Karen M, Kesler, Kenneth A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z
_version_ 1782337296576544768
author Weber, Daniel J
Okereke, Ikenna C
Birdas, Thomas J
Ceppa, DuyKhanh P
Rieger, Karen M
Kesler, Kenneth A
author_facet Weber, Daniel J
Okereke, Ikenna C
Birdas, Thomas J
Ceppa, DuyKhanh P
Rieger, Karen M
Kesler, Kenneth A
author_sort Weber, Daniel J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avoiding a separate thoracotomy with rib spreading. We undertook a study to compare outcomes of this novel "cut-in patch-out" technique with traditional thoracotomy for patients with Pancoast tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 41 patients undergoing surgical resection of Pancoast tumors requiring en-bloc removal of at least 3 ribs at our institution from 1999 to 2012. Surgery was accomplished by either a "cut-in patch-out" technique (n = 25) or traditional posterolateral thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection (n = 16). Multiple variables including patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, extent of resection, and pathology were analyzed with respect to outcomes from morbidity, narcotic use, and oncologic perspectives. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, and perioperative factors including extent of surgery, complete resections (R0), nodal status and lymph node number, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the two groups. The mean duration of out-patient narcotic use was significantly lower in the "cut-in patch-out" group compared to the thoracotomy group (80.6 days ± 62.4 vs. 158.2 days ± 119.2, p < 0.01). Using multivariate regression analysis, the traditional thoracotomy technique (OR 7.72; p = 0.01) was independently associated with prolonged oral narcotic requirements (>100 days). Additionally, five year survival for the "cut-in patch-out" group was 48% versus the traditional group at 12.5% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a traditional thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection approach for P-NSCLC, a "cut-in patch-out" technique offers an alternative approach that appears to have at least oncologic equivalence while decreasing pain. We have more recently adapted this technique to select patients with pulmonary neoplasms involving chest wall invasion and believe further investigation is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4180969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41809692014-10-03 The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study Weber, Daniel J Okereke, Ikenna C Birdas, Thomas J Ceppa, DuyKhanh P Rieger, Karen M Kesler, Kenneth A J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avoiding a separate thoracotomy with rib spreading. We undertook a study to compare outcomes of this novel "cut-in patch-out" technique with traditional thoracotomy for patients with Pancoast tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 41 patients undergoing surgical resection of Pancoast tumors requiring en-bloc removal of at least 3 ribs at our institution from 1999 to 2012. Surgery was accomplished by either a "cut-in patch-out" technique (n = 25) or traditional posterolateral thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection (n = 16). Multiple variables including patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, extent of resection, and pathology were analyzed with respect to outcomes from morbidity, narcotic use, and oncologic perspectives. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, and perioperative factors including extent of surgery, complete resections (R0), nodal status and lymph node number, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the two groups. The mean duration of out-patient narcotic use was significantly lower in the "cut-in patch-out" group compared to the thoracotomy group (80.6 days ± 62.4 vs. 158.2 days ± 119.2, p < 0.01). Using multivariate regression analysis, the traditional thoracotomy technique (OR 7.72; p = 0.01) was independently associated with prolonged oral narcotic requirements (>100 days). Additionally, five year survival for the "cut-in patch-out" group was 48% versus the traditional group at 12.5% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a traditional thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection approach for P-NSCLC, a "cut-in patch-out" technique offers an alternative approach that appears to have at least oncologic equivalence while decreasing pain. We have more recently adapted this technique to select patients with pulmonary neoplasms involving chest wall invasion and believe further investigation is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4180969/ /pubmed/25265907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z Text en © Weber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weber, Daniel J
Okereke, Ikenna C
Birdas, Thomas J
Ceppa, DuyKhanh P
Rieger, Karen M
Kesler, Kenneth A
The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
title The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
title_full The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
title_fullStr The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
title_short The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
title_sort "cut-in patch-out" technique for pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0163-z
work_keys_str_mv AT weberdanielj thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT okerekeikennac thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT birdasthomasj thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT ceppaduykhanhp thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT riegerkarenm thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT keslerkennetha thecutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT weberdanielj cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT okerekeikennac cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT birdasthomasj cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT ceppaduykhanhp cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT riegerkarenm cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy
AT keslerkennetha cutinpatchouttechniqueforpancoasttumorresectionsresultsinpostoperativepainreductionacasecontrolstudy