Cargando…

Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities

OBJECTIVE: To analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Quality of Care Scale from the perspective of people with physical and intellectual disabilities. METHODS: There were 162 people with physical disabilities and 156 with intellectual disabilities f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bredemeier, Juliana, Agranonik, Marilyn, Perez, Tatiana Spalding, Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005056
_version_ 1782337317482004480
author Bredemeier, Juliana
Agranonik, Marilyn
Perez, Tatiana Spalding
Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida
author_facet Bredemeier, Juliana
Agranonik, Marilyn
Perez, Tatiana Spalding
Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida
author_sort Bredemeier, Juliana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Quality of Care Scale from the perspective of people with physical and intellectual disabilities. METHODS: There were 162 people with physical disabilities and 156 with intellectual disabilities from Porto Alegre and metropolitan region, who participated in the study in 2008. Classical psychometrics was used to independently analyze the two samples. Hypotheses for evidence of criterion validity (concurrent type) were tested with the Mann-Whitney test for non-normal distributions. Principal components analysis was used to explore factorial models. Evidence of reliability was calculated with Cronbach alpha for the scales and subscales. Test-retest reliability was analyzed for individuals with intellectual disabilities through intra-class correlation coefficient and the Willcoxon test. RESULTS: The principal components in the group with physical disabilities replicated the original model presented as a solution to the international project data. Evidence of discriminant validity and test-retest reliability was found. CONCLUSIONS: The transcultural factor model found within the international sample project seems appropriate for the samples investigated in this study, especially the physical disabilities group. Depression, pain, satisfaction with life and disability may play a mediating role in the evaluation of quality of care. Additional research is needed to add to evidence of the validity of the instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4181102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41811022015-01-07 Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities Bredemeier, Juliana Agranonik, Marilyn Perez, Tatiana Spalding Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida Rev Saude Publica Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Quality of Care Scale from the perspective of people with physical and intellectual disabilities. METHODS: There were 162 people with physical disabilities and 156 with intellectual disabilities from Porto Alegre and metropolitan region, who participated in the study in 2008. Classical psychometrics was used to independently analyze the two samples. Hypotheses for evidence of criterion validity (concurrent type) were tested with the Mann-Whitney test for non-normal distributions. Principal components analysis was used to explore factorial models. Evidence of reliability was calculated with Cronbach alpha for the scales and subscales. Test-retest reliability was analyzed for individuals with intellectual disabilities through intra-class correlation coefficient and the Willcoxon test. RESULTS: The principal components in the group with physical disabilities replicated the original model presented as a solution to the international project data. Evidence of discriminant validity and test-retest reliability was found. CONCLUSIONS: The transcultural factor model found within the international sample project seems appropriate for the samples investigated in this study, especially the physical disabilities group. Depression, pain, satisfaction with life and disability may play a mediating role in the evaluation of quality of care. Additional research is needed to add to evidence of the validity of the instruments. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4181102/ /pubmed/25210817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005056 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bredemeier, Juliana
Agranonik, Marilyn
Perez, Tatiana Spalding
Fleck, Marcelo Pio de Almeida
Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
title Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
title_full Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
title_fullStr Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
title_short Brazilian version of the Quality of Care Scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
title_sort brazilian version of the quality of care scale: the perspective of people with disabilities
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005056
work_keys_str_mv AT bredemeierjuliana brazilianversionofthequalityofcarescaletheperspectiveofpeoplewithdisabilities
AT agranonikmarilyn brazilianversionofthequalityofcarescaletheperspectiveofpeoplewithdisabilities
AT pereztatianaspalding brazilianversionofthequalityofcarescaletheperspectiveofpeoplewithdisabilities
AT fleckmarcelopiodealmeida brazilianversionofthequalityofcarescaletheperspectiveofpeoplewithdisabilities