Cargando…

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with conventional medical treatment in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding. MATERIAL/METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Jin, Cheng, Jiajing, Wang, Qingying, Hua, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25245843
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892126
_version_ 1782337359258320896
author Qiu, Jin
Cheng, Jiajing
Wang, Qingying
Hua, Jie
author_facet Qiu, Jin
Cheng, Jiajing
Wang, Qingying
Hua, Jie
author_sort Qiu, Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with conventional medical treatment in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding. MATERIAL/METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinical trials registries (from inception to April 2014). Randomized controlled trials comparing the LNG-IUS with conventional medical treatment (mefenamic acid, tranexamic acid, norethindrone, medroxyprogesterone acetate injection, or combined oral contraceptive pills) in patients with menorrhagia were included. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials that included 1170 women (LNG-IUS, n=562; conventional medical treatment, n=608) met inclusion criteria. The LNG-IUS was superior to conventional medical treatment in reducing menstrual blood loss (as measured by the alkaline hematin method or estimated by pictorial bleeding assessment chart scores). More women were satisfied with the LNG-IUS than with the use of conventional medical treatment (odds ratio [OR] 5.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.73–9.86). Compared with conventional medical treatment, the LNG-IUS was associated with a lower rate of discontinuation (14.6% vs. 28.9%, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20–0.74) and fewer treatment failures (9.2% vs. 31.0%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10–0.34). Furthermore, quality of life assessment favored LNG-IUS over conventional medical treatment, although use of various measurements limited our ability to pool the data for more powerful evidence. Serious adverse events were statistically comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The LNG-IUS was the more effective first choice for management of menorrhagia compared with conventional medical treatment. Long-term, randomized trials are required to further investigate patient-based outcomes and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the LNG-IUS and other medical treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4181308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41813082014-10-02 Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Qiu, Jin Cheng, Jiajing Wang, Qingying Hua, Jie Med Sci Monit Review Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with conventional medical treatment in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding. MATERIAL/METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinical trials registries (from inception to April 2014). Randomized controlled trials comparing the LNG-IUS with conventional medical treatment (mefenamic acid, tranexamic acid, norethindrone, medroxyprogesterone acetate injection, or combined oral contraceptive pills) in patients with menorrhagia were included. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials that included 1170 women (LNG-IUS, n=562; conventional medical treatment, n=608) met inclusion criteria. The LNG-IUS was superior to conventional medical treatment in reducing menstrual blood loss (as measured by the alkaline hematin method or estimated by pictorial bleeding assessment chart scores). More women were satisfied with the LNG-IUS than with the use of conventional medical treatment (odds ratio [OR] 5.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.73–9.86). Compared with conventional medical treatment, the LNG-IUS was associated with a lower rate of discontinuation (14.6% vs. 28.9%, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20–0.74) and fewer treatment failures (9.2% vs. 31.0%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10–0.34). Furthermore, quality of life assessment favored LNG-IUS over conventional medical treatment, although use of various measurements limited our ability to pool the data for more powerful evidence. Serious adverse events were statistically comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The LNG-IUS was the more effective first choice for management of menorrhagia compared with conventional medical treatment. Long-term, randomized trials are required to further investigate patient-based outcomes and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the LNG-IUS and other medical treatments. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4181308/ /pubmed/25245843 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892126 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Review Articles
Qiu, Jin
Cheng, Jiajing
Wang, Qingying
Hua, Jie
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25245843
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892126
work_keys_str_mv AT qiujin levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusmedicaltherapyformenorrhagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengjiajing levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusmedicaltherapyformenorrhagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangqingying levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusmedicaltherapyformenorrhagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huajie levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemversusmedicaltherapyformenorrhagiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis