Cargando…
The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching
BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence has suggested that drug treatment courts (DTCs) reduce re-arrest rates. However, DTC program completion rates are low and little is known about the effectiveness of lower levels of program participation. OBJECTIVES: We examined how DTC program referral, enrollment with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-9-40 |
_version_ | 1782337367575625728 |
---|---|
author | Gifford, Elizabeth J Eldred, Lindsey M McCutchan, Sabrina A Sloan, Frank A |
author_facet | Gifford, Elizabeth J Eldred, Lindsey M McCutchan, Sabrina A Sloan, Frank A |
author_sort | Gifford, Elizabeth J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence has suggested that drug treatment courts (DTCs) reduce re-arrest rates. However, DTC program completion rates are low and little is known about the effectiveness of lower levels of program participation. OBJECTIVES: We examined how DTC program referral, enrollment without completion, and completion, affected re-arrest rates during a two-year follow-up. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used statewide North Carolina data from criminal courts merged with DTC data. Propensity score matching was used to select comparison groups based on demographic characteristics, criminal histories, and drug of choice (when available). Average treatment effects on the treated were computed. MEASURES: DTC participation levels included referral without enrollment, (n = 2,174), enrollment without completion (n = 954), and completion (n = 747). Recidivism measured as re-arrest on a substance-related charge, on a violent offense charge not involving an allegation of substance abuse, and on any charge (excluding infractions) was examined by felony and misdemeanor status during a two-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Re-arrest rates were high, 53–76 percent. In general, re-arrest rates were similar for individuals who were referred but who did not enroll and a matched comparison group consisting of individuals who were not referred. In contrast, enrollees who did not complete had lower re-arrest rates than a matched group of individuals who were referred but did not enroll, for arrests on any charge, on any felony charge, and on substance-related charges (felonies and misdemeanors). Finally, relative to persons who enrolled but did not complete, those who completed had lower re-arrest rates on any charge, any felony charge, any misdemeanor charge, any substance-related charge, any substance-related misdemeanor or felony charge, and any violent felony charge. CONCLUSIONS: Enrolling in a DTC, even without completing, reduced re-arrest rates. Given the generally low DTC completion rate, this finding implies that only examining effects of completion underestimates the benefits of DTC programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4181411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41814112014-10-03 The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching Gifford, Elizabeth J Eldred, Lindsey M McCutchan, Sabrina A Sloan, Frank A Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence has suggested that drug treatment courts (DTCs) reduce re-arrest rates. However, DTC program completion rates are low and little is known about the effectiveness of lower levels of program participation. OBJECTIVES: We examined how DTC program referral, enrollment without completion, and completion, affected re-arrest rates during a two-year follow-up. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used statewide North Carolina data from criminal courts merged with DTC data. Propensity score matching was used to select comparison groups based on demographic characteristics, criminal histories, and drug of choice (when available). Average treatment effects on the treated were computed. MEASURES: DTC participation levels included referral without enrollment, (n = 2,174), enrollment without completion (n = 954), and completion (n = 747). Recidivism measured as re-arrest on a substance-related charge, on a violent offense charge not involving an allegation of substance abuse, and on any charge (excluding infractions) was examined by felony and misdemeanor status during a two-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Re-arrest rates were high, 53–76 percent. In general, re-arrest rates were similar for individuals who were referred but who did not enroll and a matched comparison group consisting of individuals who were not referred. In contrast, enrollees who did not complete had lower re-arrest rates than a matched group of individuals who were referred but did not enroll, for arrests on any charge, on any felony charge, and on substance-related charges (felonies and misdemeanors). Finally, relative to persons who enrolled but did not complete, those who completed had lower re-arrest rates on any charge, any felony charge, any misdemeanor charge, any substance-related charge, any substance-related misdemeanor or felony charge, and any violent felony charge. CONCLUSIONS: Enrolling in a DTC, even without completing, reduced re-arrest rates. Given the generally low DTC completion rate, this finding implies that only examining effects of completion underestimates the benefits of DTC programs. BioMed Central 2014-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4181411/ /pubmed/25252811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-9-40 Text en © Gifford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gifford, Elizabeth J Eldred, Lindsey M McCutchan, Sabrina A Sloan, Frank A The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
title | The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
title_full | The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
title_fullStr | The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
title_short | The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
title_sort | effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-9-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giffordelizabethj theeffectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT eldredlindseym theeffectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT mccutchansabrinaa theeffectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT sloanfranka theeffectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT giffordelizabethj effectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT eldredlindseym effectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT mccutchansabrinaa effectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching AT sloanfranka effectsofparticipationlevelonrecidivismastudyofdrugtreatmentcourtsusingpropensityscorematching |