Cargando…

The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs

BACKGROUND: Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease of horses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs. METHOD: Nasal swab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galvin, Pamela, Gildea, Sarah, Nelly, Maura, Quinlivan, Michelle, Arkins, Sean, Walsh, Cathal, Cullinane, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235
_version_ 1782337380282269696
author Galvin, Pamela
Gildea, Sarah
Nelly, Maura
Quinlivan, Michelle
Arkins, Sean
Walsh, Cathal
Cullinane, Ann
author_facet Galvin, Pamela
Gildea, Sarah
Nelly, Maura
Quinlivan, Michelle
Arkins, Sean
Walsh, Cathal
Cullinane, Ann
author_sort Galvin, Pamela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease of horses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs. METHOD: Nasal swab samples from naturally and experimentally infected horses were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these assays to virus isolation (VI) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: If real-time RT-PCR was considered as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the other tests in field samples was 68% (DFA), 35% (ELISA), 29% (Espline), and 9% (VI). These tests had 100% specificity when compared to real-time RT-PCR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that decreasing the cutoff of the ELISA would increase sensitivity with some loss of specificity. In samples from experimentally infected horses, the sensitivity of the tests compared with real-time RT-PCR was 69% (VI), 27% (DFA), 6% (Espline), and 2% (ELISA). The specificity was 100% for Espline and ELISA and 95% for VI and DFA. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated that DFA is the most sensitive antigen detection test evaluated for the diagnosis of EI and that it can detect virus in some subclinical infected and vaccinated horses. The results suggest that DFA is a useful adjunct to laboratory tests and may be effective as a screening test in a quarantine station or similar facility where horses are monitored daily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4181487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41814872014-10-29 The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs Galvin, Pamela Gildea, Sarah Nelly, Maura Quinlivan, Michelle Arkins, Sean Walsh, Cathal Cullinane, Ann Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease of horses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs. METHOD: Nasal swab samples from naturally and experimentally infected horses were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these assays to virus isolation (VI) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: If real-time RT-PCR was considered as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the other tests in field samples was 68% (DFA), 35% (ELISA), 29% (Espline), and 9% (VI). These tests had 100% specificity when compared to real-time RT-PCR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that decreasing the cutoff of the ELISA would increase sensitivity with some loss of specificity. In samples from experimentally infected horses, the sensitivity of the tests compared with real-time RT-PCR was 69% (VI), 27% (DFA), 6% (Espline), and 2% (ELISA). The specificity was 100% for Espline and ELISA and 95% for VI and DFA. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated that DFA is the most sensitive antigen detection test evaluated for the diagnosis of EI and that it can detect virus in some subclinical infected and vaccinated horses. The results suggest that DFA is a useful adjunct to laboratory tests and may be effective as a screening test in a quarantine station or similar facility where horses are monitored daily. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-05 2014-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4181487/ /pubmed/24512560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Galvin, Pamela
Gildea, Sarah
Nelly, Maura
Quinlivan, Michelle
Arkins, Sean
Walsh, Cathal
Cullinane, Ann
The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
title The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
title_full The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
title_fullStr The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
title_short The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
title_sort evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235
work_keys_str_mv AT galvinpamela theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT gildeasarah theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT nellymaura theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT quinlivanmichelle theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT arkinssean theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT walshcathal theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT cullinaneann theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT galvinpamela evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT gildeasarah evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT nellymaura evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT quinlivanmichelle evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT arkinssean evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT walshcathal evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs
AT cullinaneann evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs