Cargando…
The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs
BACKGROUND: Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease of horses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs. METHOD: Nasal swab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235 |
_version_ | 1782337380282269696 |
---|---|
author | Galvin, Pamela Gildea, Sarah Nelly, Maura Quinlivan, Michelle Arkins, Sean Walsh, Cathal Cullinane, Ann |
author_facet | Galvin, Pamela Gildea, Sarah Nelly, Maura Quinlivan, Michelle Arkins, Sean Walsh, Cathal Cullinane, Ann |
author_sort | Galvin, Pamela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease of horses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs. METHOD: Nasal swab samples from naturally and experimentally infected horses were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these assays to virus isolation (VI) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: If real-time RT-PCR was considered as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the other tests in field samples was 68% (DFA), 35% (ELISA), 29% (Espline), and 9% (VI). These tests had 100% specificity when compared to real-time RT-PCR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that decreasing the cutoff of the ELISA would increase sensitivity with some loss of specificity. In samples from experimentally infected horses, the sensitivity of the tests compared with real-time RT-PCR was 69% (VI), 27% (DFA), 6% (Espline), and 2% (ELISA). The specificity was 100% for Espline and ELISA and 95% for VI and DFA. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated that DFA is the most sensitive antigen detection test evaluated for the diagnosis of EI and that it can detect virus in some subclinical infected and vaccinated horses. The results suggest that DFA is a useful adjunct to laboratory tests and may be effective as a screening test in a quarantine station or similar facility where horses are monitored daily. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4181487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41814872014-10-29 The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs Galvin, Pamela Gildea, Sarah Nelly, Maura Quinlivan, Michelle Arkins, Sean Walsh, Cathal Cullinane, Ann Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease of horses. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate two rapid antigen detection kits (Directigen or DFA, and Espline) and a commercial ELISA for the detection of EI nucleoprotein in nasal swabs. METHOD: Nasal swab samples from naturally and experimentally infected horses were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these assays to virus isolation (VI) and real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: If real-time RT-PCR was considered as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the other tests in field samples was 68% (DFA), 35% (ELISA), 29% (Espline), and 9% (VI). These tests had 100% specificity when compared to real-time RT-PCR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that decreasing the cutoff of the ELISA would increase sensitivity with some loss of specificity. In samples from experimentally infected horses, the sensitivity of the tests compared with real-time RT-PCR was 69% (VI), 27% (DFA), 6% (Espline), and 2% (ELISA). The specificity was 100% for Espline and ELISA and 95% for VI and DFA. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated that DFA is the most sensitive antigen detection test evaluated for the diagnosis of EI and that it can detect virus in some subclinical infected and vaccinated horses. The results suggest that DFA is a useful adjunct to laboratory tests and may be effective as a screening test in a quarantine station or similar facility where horses are monitored daily. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-05 2014-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4181487/ /pubmed/24512560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Galvin, Pamela Gildea, Sarah Nelly, Maura Quinlivan, Michelle Arkins, Sean Walsh, Cathal Cullinane, Ann The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
title | The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
title_full | The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
title_short | The evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
title_sort | evaluation of three diagnostic tests for the detection of equine influenza nucleoprotein in nasal swabs |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galvinpamela theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT gildeasarah theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT nellymaura theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT quinlivanmichelle theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT arkinssean theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT walshcathal theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT cullinaneann theevaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT galvinpamela evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT gildeasarah evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT nellymaura evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT quinlivanmichelle evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT arkinssean evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT walshcathal evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs AT cullinaneann evaluationofthreediagnostictestsforthedetectionofequineinfluenzanucleoproteininnasalswabs |