Cargando…
Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding
This work presents numerical well testing interpretation model and analysis techniques to evaluate formation by using pressure transient data acquired with logging tools in crossflow double-layer reservoirs by polymer flooding. A well testing model is established based on rheology experiments and by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/890874 |
_version_ | 1782337382904758272 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Haiyang Guo, Hui He, Youwei Xu, Hainan Li, Lei Zhang, Tiantian Xian, Bo Du, Song Cheng, Shiqing |
author_facet | Yu, Haiyang Guo, Hui He, Youwei Xu, Hainan Li, Lei Zhang, Tiantian Xian, Bo Du, Song Cheng, Shiqing |
author_sort | Yu, Haiyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work presents numerical well testing interpretation model and analysis techniques to evaluate formation by using pressure transient data acquired with logging tools in crossflow double-layer reservoirs by polymer flooding. A well testing model is established based on rheology experiments and by considering shear, diffusion, convection, inaccessible pore volume (IPV), permeability reduction, wellbore storage effect, and skin factors. The type curves were then developed based on this model, and parameter sensitivity is analyzed. Our research shows that the type curves have five segments with different flow status: (I) wellbore storage section, (II) intermediate flow section (transient section), (III) mid-radial flow section, (IV) crossflow section (from low permeability layer to high permeability layer), and (V) systematic radial flow section. The polymer flooding field tests prove that our model can accurately determine formation parameters in crossflow double-layer reservoirs by polymer flooding. Moreover, formation damage caused by polymer flooding can also be evaluated by comparison of the interpreted permeability with initial layered permeability before polymer flooding. Comparison of the analysis of numerical solution based on flow mechanism with observed polymer flooding field test data highlights the potential for the application of this interpretation method in formation evaluation and enhanced oil recovery (EOR). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4181499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41814992014-10-09 Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding Yu, Haiyang Guo, Hui He, Youwei Xu, Hainan Li, Lei Zhang, Tiantian Xian, Bo Du, Song Cheng, Shiqing ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This work presents numerical well testing interpretation model and analysis techniques to evaluate formation by using pressure transient data acquired with logging tools in crossflow double-layer reservoirs by polymer flooding. A well testing model is established based on rheology experiments and by considering shear, diffusion, convection, inaccessible pore volume (IPV), permeability reduction, wellbore storage effect, and skin factors. The type curves were then developed based on this model, and parameter sensitivity is analyzed. Our research shows that the type curves have five segments with different flow status: (I) wellbore storage section, (II) intermediate flow section (transient section), (III) mid-radial flow section, (IV) crossflow section (from low permeability layer to high permeability layer), and (V) systematic radial flow section. The polymer flooding field tests prove that our model can accurately determine formation parameters in crossflow double-layer reservoirs by polymer flooding. Moreover, formation damage caused by polymer flooding can also be evaluated by comparison of the interpreted permeability with initial layered permeability before polymer flooding. Comparison of the analysis of numerical solution based on flow mechanism with observed polymer flooding field test data highlights the potential for the application of this interpretation method in formation evaluation and enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4181499/ /pubmed/25302335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/890874 Text en Copyright © 2014 Haiyang Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yu, Haiyang Guo, Hui He, Youwei Xu, Hainan Li, Lei Zhang, Tiantian Xian, Bo Du, Song Cheng, Shiqing Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding |
title | Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding |
title_full | Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding |
title_fullStr | Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding |
title_full_unstemmed | Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding |
title_short | Numerical Well Testing Interpretation Model and Applications in Crossflow Double-Layer Reservoirs by Polymer Flooding |
title_sort | numerical well testing interpretation model and applications in crossflow double-layer reservoirs by polymer flooding |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/890874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuhaiyang numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT guohui numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT heyouwei numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT xuhainan numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT lilei numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT zhangtiantian numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT xianbo numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT dusong numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding AT chengshiqing numericalwelltestinginterpretationmodelandapplicationsincrossflowdoublelayerreservoirsbypolymerflooding |