Cargando…
A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
PURPOSE: This study was designed to formulate a model that efficiently predicts splenic hilar lymph node metastasis (SHLNM) in patients with proximal gastric cancer and to assess indications for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection (LSPNo.10LND) based on this model. METHODS: Pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108480 |
_version_ | 1782337393125228544 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chang-Ming Zhang, Jun-Rong Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue |
author_facet | Huang, Chang-Ming Zhang, Jun-Rong Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue |
author_sort | Huang, Chang-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was designed to formulate a model that efficiently predicts splenic hilar lymph node metastasis (SHLNM) in patients with proximal gastric cancer and to assess indications for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection (LSPNo.10LND) based on this model. METHODS: Patients (N = 346) with proximal gastric cancer who underwent LSPNo.10LND from January 2010 to October 2013 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. Groups of patients with and without SHLNM were compared, and independent risk factors for SHLNM determined. An optimal predictive model of SHLNM in patients with proximal gastric cancer was well established. RESULTS: Of the 346 patients with proximal gastric cancer, only 35 (10.1%) were diagnosed with SHLNM. Depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases to No.7 and No.11 lymph nodes (LNs) were independent risk factors for SHLNM (p<0.0001 each). A model involving depth of invasion, tumor location and metastasis to No.7 and 11 LNs yielded a lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of −913.535 and a highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.897(95%CI:0.851–0.944). Stratification analysis showed no SHLNMs in the absence of serosal invasion of the lesser curvature and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs (T2-3∶0/87, 95% CI: 0.00–4.15). CONCLUSIONS: A model including depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs was found optimal for predicting SHLNM for proximal gastric cancers. LSPNo.10LND may be avoided when tumors on the lesser curvature did not show serosal invasion or metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4181621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41816212014-10-07 A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study Huang, Chang-Ming Zhang, Jun-Rong Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study was designed to formulate a model that efficiently predicts splenic hilar lymph node metastasis (SHLNM) in patients with proximal gastric cancer and to assess indications for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection (LSPNo.10LND) based on this model. METHODS: Patients (N = 346) with proximal gastric cancer who underwent LSPNo.10LND from January 2010 to October 2013 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. Groups of patients with and without SHLNM were compared, and independent risk factors for SHLNM determined. An optimal predictive model of SHLNM in patients with proximal gastric cancer was well established. RESULTS: Of the 346 patients with proximal gastric cancer, only 35 (10.1%) were diagnosed with SHLNM. Depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases to No.7 and No.11 lymph nodes (LNs) were independent risk factors for SHLNM (p<0.0001 each). A model involving depth of invasion, tumor location and metastasis to No.7 and 11 LNs yielded a lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of −913.535 and a highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.897(95%CI:0.851–0.944). Stratification analysis showed no SHLNMs in the absence of serosal invasion of the lesser curvature and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs (T2-3∶0/87, 95% CI: 0.00–4.15). CONCLUSIONS: A model including depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs was found optimal for predicting SHLNM for proximal gastric cancers. LSPNo.10LND may be avoided when tumors on the lesser curvature did not show serosal invasion or metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs. Public Library of Science 2014-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4181621/ /pubmed/25264673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108480 Text en © 2014 Huang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Chang-Ming Zhang, Jun-Rong Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study |
title | A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study |
title_full | A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study |
title_fullStr | A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study |
title_short | A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study |
title_sort | 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchangming a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT zhangjunrong a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT zhengchaohui a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT liping a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT xiejianwei a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT wangjiabin a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT linjianxian a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT lujun a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT chenqiyue a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT huangchangming 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT zhangjunrong 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT zhengchaohui 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT liping 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT xiejianwei 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT wangjiabin 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT linjianxian 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT lujun 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy AT chenqiyue 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy |