Cargando…

A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study

PURPOSE: This study was designed to formulate a model that efficiently predicts splenic hilar lymph node metastasis (SHLNM) in patients with proximal gastric cancer and to assess indications for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection (LSPNo.10LND) based on this model. METHODS: Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chang-Ming, Zhang, Jun-Rong, Zheng, Chao-Hui, Li, Ping, Xie, Jian-Wei, Wang, Jia-Bin, Lin, Jian-Xian, Lu, Jun, Chen, Qi-Yue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108480
_version_ 1782337393125228544
author Huang, Chang-Ming
Zhang, Jun-Rong
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Xie, Jian-Wei
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Lu, Jun
Chen, Qi-Yue
author_facet Huang, Chang-Ming
Zhang, Jun-Rong
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Xie, Jian-Wei
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Lu, Jun
Chen, Qi-Yue
author_sort Huang, Chang-Ming
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was designed to formulate a model that efficiently predicts splenic hilar lymph node metastasis (SHLNM) in patients with proximal gastric cancer and to assess indications for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection (LSPNo.10LND) based on this model. METHODS: Patients (N = 346) with proximal gastric cancer who underwent LSPNo.10LND from January 2010 to October 2013 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. Groups of patients with and without SHLNM were compared, and independent risk factors for SHLNM determined. An optimal predictive model of SHLNM in patients with proximal gastric cancer was well established. RESULTS: Of the 346 patients with proximal gastric cancer, only 35 (10.1%) were diagnosed with SHLNM. Depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases to No.7 and No.11 lymph nodes (LNs) were independent risk factors for SHLNM (p<0.0001 each). A model involving depth of invasion, tumor location and metastasis to No.7 and 11 LNs yielded a lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of −913.535 and a highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.897(95%CI:0.851–0.944). Stratification analysis showed no SHLNMs in the absence of serosal invasion of the lesser curvature and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs (T2-3∶0/87, 95% CI: 0.00–4.15). CONCLUSIONS: A model including depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs was found optimal for predicting SHLNM for proximal gastric cancers. LSPNo.10LND may be avoided when tumors on the lesser curvature did not show serosal invasion or metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4181621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41816212014-10-07 A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study Huang, Chang-Ming Zhang, Jun-Rong Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Xie, Jian-Wei Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Lu, Jun Chen, Qi-Yue PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study was designed to formulate a model that efficiently predicts splenic hilar lymph node metastasis (SHLNM) in patients with proximal gastric cancer and to assess indications for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection (LSPNo.10LND) based on this model. METHODS: Patients (N = 346) with proximal gastric cancer who underwent LSPNo.10LND from January 2010 to October 2013 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. Groups of patients with and without SHLNM were compared, and independent risk factors for SHLNM determined. An optimal predictive model of SHLNM in patients with proximal gastric cancer was well established. RESULTS: Of the 346 patients with proximal gastric cancer, only 35 (10.1%) were diagnosed with SHLNM. Depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases to No.7 and No.11 lymph nodes (LNs) were independent risk factors for SHLNM (p<0.0001 each). A model involving depth of invasion, tumor location and metastasis to No.7 and 11 LNs yielded a lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of −913.535 and a highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.897(95%CI:0.851–0.944). Stratification analysis showed no SHLNMs in the absence of serosal invasion of the lesser curvature and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs (T2-3∶0/87, 95% CI: 0.00–4.15). CONCLUSIONS: A model including depth of invasion, tumor location and metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs was found optimal for predicting SHLNM for proximal gastric cancers. LSPNo.10LND may be avoided when tumors on the lesser curvature did not show serosal invasion or metastases at No.7 and No.11 LNs. Public Library of Science 2014-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4181621/ /pubmed/25264673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108480 Text en © 2014 Huang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Chang-Ming
Zhang, Jun-Rong
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Xie, Jian-Wei
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Lu, Jun
Chen, Qi-Yue
A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
title A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
title_full A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
title_fullStr A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
title_full_unstemmed A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
title_short A 346 Case Analysis for Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No.10 Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Study
title_sort 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108480
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchangming a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT zhangjunrong a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT zhengchaohui a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT liping a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT xiejianwei a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT wangjiabin a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT linjianxian a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT lujun a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT chenqiyue a346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT huangchangming 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT zhangjunrong 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT zhengchaohui 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT liping 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT xiejianwei 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT wangjiabin 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT linjianxian 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT lujun 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy
AT chenqiyue 346caseanalysisforlaparoscopicspleenpreservingno10lymphnodedissectionforproximalgastriccancerasinglecenterstudy