Cargando…

Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare temporomandibular joint changes especially disk-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion using Twin Block and Bionator appliances. METHODS: The total sample consis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chavan, Santosh J, Bhad, Wasundhara A, Doshi, Umal H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0057-6
_version_ 1782337404360720384
author Chavan, Santosh J
Bhad, Wasundhara A
Doshi, Umal H
author_facet Chavan, Santosh J
Bhad, Wasundhara A
Doshi, Umal H
author_sort Chavan, Santosh J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare temporomandibular joint changes especially disk-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion using Twin Block and Bionator appliances. METHODS: The total sample consisted of 30 subjects (13 males and 17 females) with class II division 1 malocclusion having mandibular retrognathism, in the age group of 9 to 14 years. Two treatment groups, i.e., Twin Block and Bionator groups, were formed which comprised ten subjects each, while a group of ten subjects served as the control group. The treatment effects were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the treatment groups, pretreatment MRI with wax construction bite was taken. For all subjects, MRI images with corrected sagittal T1 images were recorded in a maximal intercuspation position at pretreatment (R1) and in an unstrained retruded position at the end of a 6-month observation period (R2). RESULTS: At the end of 6 months of treatment, the condyles occupied a more anterior position in the fossa to its pretreatment position, while the disk moved more posteriorly in relation to the condyle. The control group showed no changes in the condyle and disk position over a period of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although the treatment group showed consistent forward positioning of the condyle and backward movement of the disk, long-term MRI findings in these groups will further clarify the adaptations between the condyle fossa and articular disk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4181700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41817002014-10-03 Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study Chavan, Santosh J Bhad, Wasundhara A Doshi, Umal H Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare temporomandibular joint changes especially disk-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion using Twin Block and Bionator appliances. METHODS: The total sample consisted of 30 subjects (13 males and 17 females) with class II division 1 malocclusion having mandibular retrognathism, in the age group of 9 to 14 years. Two treatment groups, i.e., Twin Block and Bionator groups, were formed which comprised ten subjects each, while a group of ten subjects served as the control group. The treatment effects were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the treatment groups, pretreatment MRI with wax construction bite was taken. For all subjects, MRI images with corrected sagittal T1 images were recorded in a maximal intercuspation position at pretreatment (R1) and in an unstrained retruded position at the end of a 6-month observation period (R2). RESULTS: At the end of 6 months of treatment, the condyles occupied a more anterior position in the fossa to its pretreatment position, while the disk moved more posteriorly in relation to the condyle. The control group showed no changes in the condyle and disk position over a period of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although the treatment group showed consistent forward positioning of the condyle and backward movement of the disk, long-term MRI findings in these groups will further clarify the adaptations between the condyle fossa and articular disk. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4181700/ /pubmed/25329768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0057-6 Text en © Chavan et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Chavan, Santosh J
Bhad, Wasundhara A
Doshi, Umal H
Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
title Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
title_full Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
title_fullStr Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
title_short Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
title_sort comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in twin block and bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0057-6
work_keys_str_mv AT chavansantoshj comparisonoftemporomandibularjointchangesintwinblockandbionatorappliancetherapyamagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT bhadwasundharaa comparisonoftemporomandibularjointchangesintwinblockandbionatorappliancetherapyamagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT doshiumalh comparisonoftemporomandibularjointchangesintwinblockandbionatorappliancetherapyamagneticresonanceimagingstudy