Cargando…
The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study
BACKGROUND: Genetic contributions to major depressive disorder (MDD) are thought to result from multiple genes interacting with each other. Different procedures have been proposed to detect such interactions. Which approach is best for explaining the risk of developing disease is unclear. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-19 |
_version_ | 1782337414458507264 |
---|---|
author | Lekman, Magnus Hössjer, Ola Andrews, Peter Källberg, Henrik Uvehag, Daniel Charney, Dennis Manji, Husseini Rush, John A McMahon, Francis J Moore, Jason H Kockum, Ingrid |
author_facet | Lekman, Magnus Hössjer, Ola Andrews, Peter Källberg, Henrik Uvehag, Daniel Charney, Dennis Manji, Husseini Rush, John A McMahon, Francis J Moore, Jason H Kockum, Ingrid |
author_sort | Lekman, Magnus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genetic contributions to major depressive disorder (MDD) are thought to result from multiple genes interacting with each other. Different procedures have been proposed to detect such interactions. Which approach is best for explaining the risk of developing disease is unclear. This study sought to elucidate the genetic interaction landscape in candidate genes for MDD by conducting a SNP-SNP interaction analysis using an exhaustive search through 3,704 SNP-markers in 1,732 cases and 1,783 controls provided from the GAIN MDD study. We used three different methods to detect interactions, two logistic regressions models (multiplicative and additive) and one data mining and machine learning (MDR) approach. RESULTS: Although none of the interaction survived correction for multiple comparisons, the results provide important information for future genetic interaction studies in complex disorders. Among the 0.5% most significant observations, none had been reported previously for risk to MDD. Within this group of interactions, less than 0.03% would have been detectable based on main effect approach or an a priori algorithm. We evaluated correlations among the three different models and conclude that all three algorithms detected the same interactions to a low degree. Although the top interactions had a surprisingly large effect size for MDD (e.g. additive dominant model P(uncorrected) = 9.10E-9 with attributable proportion (AP) value = 0.58 and multiplicative recessive model with P(uncorrected) = 6.95E-5 with odds ratio (OR estimated from β3) value = 4.99) the area under the curve (AUC) estimates were low (< 0.54). Moreover, the population attributable fraction (PAF) estimates were also low (< 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the top interactions on their own did not explain much of the genetic variance of MDD. The different statistical interaction methods we used in the present study did not identify the same pairs of interacting markers. Genetic interaction studies may uncover previously unsuspected effects that could provide novel insights into MDD risk, but much larger sample sizes are needed before this strategy can be powerfully applied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4181757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41817572014-10-03 The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study Lekman, Magnus Hössjer, Ola Andrews, Peter Källberg, Henrik Uvehag, Daniel Charney, Dennis Manji, Husseini Rush, John A McMahon, Francis J Moore, Jason H Kockum, Ingrid BioData Min Research BACKGROUND: Genetic contributions to major depressive disorder (MDD) are thought to result from multiple genes interacting with each other. Different procedures have been proposed to detect such interactions. Which approach is best for explaining the risk of developing disease is unclear. This study sought to elucidate the genetic interaction landscape in candidate genes for MDD by conducting a SNP-SNP interaction analysis using an exhaustive search through 3,704 SNP-markers in 1,732 cases and 1,783 controls provided from the GAIN MDD study. We used three different methods to detect interactions, two logistic regressions models (multiplicative and additive) and one data mining and machine learning (MDR) approach. RESULTS: Although none of the interaction survived correction for multiple comparisons, the results provide important information for future genetic interaction studies in complex disorders. Among the 0.5% most significant observations, none had been reported previously for risk to MDD. Within this group of interactions, less than 0.03% would have been detectable based on main effect approach or an a priori algorithm. We evaluated correlations among the three different models and conclude that all three algorithms detected the same interactions to a low degree. Although the top interactions had a surprisingly large effect size for MDD (e.g. additive dominant model P(uncorrected) = 9.10E-9 with attributable proportion (AP) value = 0.58 and multiplicative recessive model with P(uncorrected) = 6.95E-5 with odds ratio (OR estimated from β3) value = 4.99) the area under the curve (AUC) estimates were low (< 0.54). Moreover, the population attributable fraction (PAF) estimates were also low (< 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the top interactions on their own did not explain much of the genetic variance of MDD. The different statistical interaction methods we used in the present study did not identify the same pairs of interacting markers. Genetic interaction studies may uncover previously unsuspected effects that could provide novel insights into MDD risk, but much larger sample sizes are needed before this strategy can be powerfully applied. BioMed Central 2014-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4181757/ /pubmed/25279001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-19 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lekman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Lekman, Magnus Hössjer, Ola Andrews, Peter Källberg, Henrik Uvehag, Daniel Charney, Dennis Manji, Husseini Rush, John A McMahon, Francis J Moore, Jason H Kockum, Ingrid The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study |
title | The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study |
title_full | The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study |
title_fullStr | The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study |
title_short | The genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in Major Depressive Disorder: an explorative study |
title_sort | genetic interacting landscape of 63 candidate genes in major depressive disorder: an explorative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lekmanmagnus thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT hossjerola thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT andrewspeter thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT kallberghenrik thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT uvehagdaniel thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT charneydennis thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT manjihusseini thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT rushjohna thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT mcmahonfrancisj thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT moorejasonh thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT kockumingrid thegeneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT lekmanmagnus geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT hossjerola geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT andrewspeter geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT kallberghenrik geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT uvehagdaniel geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT charneydennis geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT manjihusseini geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT rushjohna geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT mcmahonfrancisj geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT moorejasonh geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy AT kockumingrid geneticinteractinglandscapeof63candidategenesinmajordepressivedisorderanexplorativestudy |