Cargando…

The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier

Male circumcision provides partial protection against multiple sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, but the mechanisms are not fully understood. To examine potential vulnerabilities in foreskin epithelial structure, we used Wilcoxon paired tests adjusted using the false discovery r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemos, Maria P., Lama, Javier R., Karuna, Shelly T., Fong, Youyi, Montano, Silvia M., Ganoza, Carmela, Gottardo, Raphael, Sanchez, Jorge, McElrath, M. Juliana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108954
_version_ 1782337566321672192
author Lemos, Maria P.
Lama, Javier R.
Karuna, Shelly T.
Fong, Youyi
Montano, Silvia M.
Ganoza, Carmela
Gottardo, Raphael
Sanchez, Jorge
McElrath, M. Juliana
author_facet Lemos, Maria P.
Lama, Javier R.
Karuna, Shelly T.
Fong, Youyi
Montano, Silvia M.
Ganoza, Carmela
Gottardo, Raphael
Sanchez, Jorge
McElrath, M. Juliana
author_sort Lemos, Maria P.
collection PubMed
description Male circumcision provides partial protection against multiple sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, but the mechanisms are not fully understood. To examine potential vulnerabilities in foreskin epithelial structure, we used Wilcoxon paired tests adjusted using the false discovery rate method to compare inner and outer foreskin samples from 20 healthy, sexually active Peruvian males who have sex with males or transgender females, ages 21–29, at elevated risk of HIV infection. No evidence of epithelial microtrauma was identified, as assessed by keratinocyte activation, fibronectin deposition, or parakeratosis. However, multiple suprabasal tight junction differences were identified: 1) inner foreskin stratum corneum was thinner than outer (p = 0.035); 2) claudin 1 had extended membrane-bound localization throughout inner epidermis stratum spinosum (p = 0.035); 3) membrane-bound claudin 4 was absent from inner foreskin stratum granulosum (p = 0.035); and 4) occludin had increased membrane deposition in inner foreskin stratum granulosum (p = 0.042) versus outer. Together, this suggests subclinical inflammation and paracellular transport modifications to the inner foreskin. A setting of inflammation was further supported by inner foreskin epithelial explant cultures secreting higher levels of GM-CSF (p = 0.029), IP-10 (p = 0.035) and RANTES (p = 0.022) than outer foreskin, and also containing an increased density of CCR5+ and CD4+ CCR5+ cells (p = 0.022). Inner foreskin dermis also secreted more RANTES than outer (p = 0.036), and had increased density of CCR5+ cells (p = 0.022). In conclusion, subclinical changes to the inner foreskin of sexually active males may support an inflammatory state, with availability of target cells for HIV infection and modifications to epidermal barriers, potentially explaining the benefits of circumcision for STI prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4182607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41826072014-10-07 The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier Lemos, Maria P. Lama, Javier R. Karuna, Shelly T. Fong, Youyi Montano, Silvia M. Ganoza, Carmela Gottardo, Raphael Sanchez, Jorge McElrath, M. Juliana PLoS One Research Article Male circumcision provides partial protection against multiple sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, but the mechanisms are not fully understood. To examine potential vulnerabilities in foreskin epithelial structure, we used Wilcoxon paired tests adjusted using the false discovery rate method to compare inner and outer foreskin samples from 20 healthy, sexually active Peruvian males who have sex with males or transgender females, ages 21–29, at elevated risk of HIV infection. No evidence of epithelial microtrauma was identified, as assessed by keratinocyte activation, fibronectin deposition, or parakeratosis. However, multiple suprabasal tight junction differences were identified: 1) inner foreskin stratum corneum was thinner than outer (p = 0.035); 2) claudin 1 had extended membrane-bound localization throughout inner epidermis stratum spinosum (p = 0.035); 3) membrane-bound claudin 4 was absent from inner foreskin stratum granulosum (p = 0.035); and 4) occludin had increased membrane deposition in inner foreskin stratum granulosum (p = 0.042) versus outer. Together, this suggests subclinical inflammation and paracellular transport modifications to the inner foreskin. A setting of inflammation was further supported by inner foreskin epithelial explant cultures secreting higher levels of GM-CSF (p = 0.029), IP-10 (p = 0.035) and RANTES (p = 0.022) than outer foreskin, and also containing an increased density of CCR5+ and CD4+ CCR5+ cells (p = 0.022). Inner foreskin dermis also secreted more RANTES than outer (p = 0.036), and had increased density of CCR5+ cells (p = 0.022). In conclusion, subclinical changes to the inner foreskin of sexually active males may support an inflammatory state, with availability of target cells for HIV infection and modifications to epidermal barriers, potentially explaining the benefits of circumcision for STI prevention. Public Library of Science 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4182607/ /pubmed/25268493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108954 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lemos, Maria P.
Lama, Javier R.
Karuna, Shelly T.
Fong, Youyi
Montano, Silvia M.
Ganoza, Carmela
Gottardo, Raphael
Sanchez, Jorge
McElrath, M. Juliana
The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier
title The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier
title_full The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier
title_fullStr The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier
title_full_unstemmed The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier
title_short The Inner Foreskin of Healthy Males at Risk of HIV Infection Harbors Epithelial CD4+ CCR5+ Cells and Has Features of an Inflamed Epidermal Barrier
title_sort inner foreskin of healthy males at risk of hiv infection harbors epithelial cd4+ ccr5+ cells and has features of an inflamed epidermal barrier
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108954
work_keys_str_mv AT lemosmariap theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT lamajavierr theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT karunashellyt theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT fongyouyi theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT montanosilviam theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT ganozacarmela theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT gottardoraphael theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT sanchezjorge theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT mcelrathmjuliana theinnerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT lemosmariap innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT lamajavierr innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT karunashellyt innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT fongyouyi innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT montanosilviam innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT ganozacarmela innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT gottardoraphael innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT sanchezjorge innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier
AT mcelrathmjuliana innerforeskinofhealthymalesatriskofhivinfectionharborsepithelialcd4ccr5cellsandhasfeaturesofaninflamedepidermalbarrier