Cargando…
Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
BACKGROUND: Posterior wall fracture is the most common acetabular fracture. Comminuted fractures with an impacted segment represent a subtype of this injury. The subchondral bone of the articular zone is compressed and causes a bone defect. The impacted fragment should be isolated, mobilized, and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0291-1 |
_version_ | 1782337568203866112 |
---|---|
author | Pascarella, R. Commessatti, M. Politano, R. Maresca, A. Del Torto, M. Chehrassan, M. Fantasia, R. |
author_facet | Pascarella, R. Commessatti, M. Politano, R. Maresca, A. Del Torto, M. Chehrassan, M. Fantasia, R. |
author_sort | Pascarella, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Posterior wall fracture is the most common acetabular fracture. Comminuted fractures with an impacted segment represent a subtype of this injury. The subchondral bone of the articular zone is compressed and causes a bone defect. The impacted fragment should be isolated, mobilized, and then reduced. A bone graft should be used to fill the gap. The other fragments are fixed following the reduction of the impacted segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with comminuted fractures and impacted segments with bone defects were enrolled in our study, from January 2010 to July 2012. Autogenous bone grafts from the greater trochanter were used to fill the gap in all patients. The reduction was achieved through the insertion of the graft above the impacted fracture, and plate fixation was performed subsequently. Merle d’Aubigne and Postel scoring, modified by Matta, was applied to evaluate the patients during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: The clinical results included one “excellent”, four “very good”, four “good” and one “poor”. Pain in the zone of graft harvesting was not detected in any patient. Femoral head necrosis was observed in one case. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Using an autogenous bone graft to fill the bone defect supplies excellent mechanical stability without any severe complications at the donor site. This surgical technique seems to be effective and safe in treating a comminuted fracture of the posterior wall in association with an impacted segment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4182615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41826152014-10-06 Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments Pascarella, R. Commessatti, M. Politano, R. Maresca, A. Del Torto, M. Chehrassan, M. Fantasia, R. J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Posterior wall fracture is the most common acetabular fracture. Comminuted fractures with an impacted segment represent a subtype of this injury. The subchondral bone of the articular zone is compressed and causes a bone defect. The impacted fragment should be isolated, mobilized, and then reduced. A bone graft should be used to fill the gap. The other fragments are fixed following the reduction of the impacted segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with comminuted fractures and impacted segments with bone defects were enrolled in our study, from January 2010 to July 2012. Autogenous bone grafts from the greater trochanter were used to fill the gap in all patients. The reduction was achieved through the insertion of the graft above the impacted fracture, and plate fixation was performed subsequently. Merle d’Aubigne and Postel scoring, modified by Matta, was applied to evaluate the patients during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: The clinical results included one “excellent”, four “very good”, four “good” and one “poor”. Pain in the zone of graft harvesting was not detected in any patient. Femoral head necrosis was observed in one case. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Using an autogenous bone graft to fill the bone defect supplies excellent mechanical stability without any severe complications at the donor site. This surgical technique seems to be effective and safe in treating a comminuted fracture of the posterior wall in association with an impacted segment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Springer International Publishing 2014-03-27 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4182615/ /pubmed/24671489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0291-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pascarella, R. Commessatti, M. Politano, R. Maresca, A. Del Torto, M. Chehrassan, M. Fantasia, R. Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
title | Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
title_full | Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
title_fullStr | Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
title_short | Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
title_sort | bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0291-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pascarellar bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments AT commessattim bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments AT politanor bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments AT marescaa bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments AT deltortom bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments AT chehrassanm bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments AT fantasiar bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments |