Cargando…

Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments

BACKGROUND: Posterior wall fracture is the most common acetabular fracture. Comminuted fractures with an impacted segment represent a subtype of this injury. The subchondral bone of the articular zone is compressed and causes a bone defect. The impacted fragment should be isolated, mobilized, and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pascarella, R., Commessatti, M., Politano, R., Maresca, A., Del Torto, M., Chehrassan, M., Fantasia, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0291-1
_version_ 1782337568203866112
author Pascarella, R.
Commessatti, M.
Politano, R.
Maresca, A.
Del Torto, M.
Chehrassan, M.
Fantasia, R.
author_facet Pascarella, R.
Commessatti, M.
Politano, R.
Maresca, A.
Del Torto, M.
Chehrassan, M.
Fantasia, R.
author_sort Pascarella, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posterior wall fracture is the most common acetabular fracture. Comminuted fractures with an impacted segment represent a subtype of this injury. The subchondral bone of the articular zone is compressed and causes a bone defect. The impacted fragment should be isolated, mobilized, and then reduced. A bone graft should be used to fill the gap. The other fragments are fixed following the reduction of the impacted segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with comminuted fractures and impacted segments with bone defects were enrolled in our study, from January 2010 to July 2012. Autogenous bone grafts from the greater trochanter were used to fill the gap in all patients. The reduction was achieved through the insertion of the graft above the impacted fracture, and plate fixation was performed subsequently. Merle d’Aubigne and Postel scoring, modified by Matta, was applied to evaluate the patients during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: The clinical results included one “excellent”, four “very good”, four “good” and one “poor”. Pain in the zone of graft harvesting was not detected in any patient. Femoral head necrosis was observed in one case. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Using an autogenous bone graft to fill the bone defect supplies excellent mechanical stability without any severe complications at the donor site. This surgical technique seems to be effective and safe in treating a comminuted fracture of the posterior wall in association with an impacted segment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4182615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41826152014-10-06 Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments Pascarella, R. Commessatti, M. Politano, R. Maresca, A. Del Torto, M. Chehrassan, M. Fantasia, R. J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Posterior wall fracture is the most common acetabular fracture. Comminuted fractures with an impacted segment represent a subtype of this injury. The subchondral bone of the articular zone is compressed and causes a bone defect. The impacted fragment should be isolated, mobilized, and then reduced. A bone graft should be used to fill the gap. The other fragments are fixed following the reduction of the impacted segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with comminuted fractures and impacted segments with bone defects were enrolled in our study, from January 2010 to July 2012. Autogenous bone grafts from the greater trochanter were used to fill the gap in all patients. The reduction was achieved through the insertion of the graft above the impacted fracture, and plate fixation was performed subsequently. Merle d’Aubigne and Postel scoring, modified by Matta, was applied to evaluate the patients during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: The clinical results included one “excellent”, four “very good”, four “good” and one “poor”. Pain in the zone of graft harvesting was not detected in any patient. Femoral head necrosis was observed in one case. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Using an autogenous bone graft to fill the bone defect supplies excellent mechanical stability without any severe complications at the donor site. This surgical technique seems to be effective and safe in treating a comminuted fracture of the posterior wall in association with an impacted segment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Springer International Publishing 2014-03-27 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4182615/ /pubmed/24671489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0291-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pascarella, R.
Commessatti, M.
Politano, R.
Maresca, A.
Del Torto, M.
Chehrassan, M.
Fantasia, R.
Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
title Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
title_full Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
title_fullStr Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
title_full_unstemmed Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
title_short Bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
title_sort bone graft from greater trochanter in posterior wall fractures with impacted fragments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0291-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pascarellar bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments
AT commessattim bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments
AT politanor bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments
AT marescaa bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments
AT deltortom bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments
AT chehrassanm bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments
AT fantasiar bonegraftfromgreatertrochanterinposteriorwallfractureswithimpactedfragments