Cargando…

Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devonshire, Alison S., Whale, Alexandra S., Gutteridge, Alice, Jones, Gerwyn, Cowen, Simon, Foy, Carole A., Huggett, Jim F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3
_version_ 1782337577437626368
author Devonshire, Alison S.
Whale, Alexandra S.
Gutteridge, Alice
Jones, Gerwyn
Cowen, Simon
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
author_facet Devonshire, Alison S.
Whale, Alexandra S.
Gutteridge, Alice
Jones, Gerwyn
Cowen, Simon
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
author_sort Devonshire, Alison S.
collection PubMed
description Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequences in predominantly maternal cfDNA. Consequently, quality controls are required for measurement of extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and yield for validation of cfDNA methods. We evaluated the utility of an external DNA spike for monitoring these parameters in a study comparing three specific cfDNA extraction methods [QIAamp® circulating nucleic acid (CNA) kit, NucleoSpin® Plasma XS (NS) kit and FitAmp™ plasma/serum DNA isolation (FA) kit] with the commonly used QIAamp DNA blood mini (DBM) kit. We found that the extraction efficiencies of the kits ranked in the order CNA kit > DBM kit > NS kit > FA kit, and the CNA and NS kits gave a better representation of smaller DNA fragments in the extract than the DBM kit. We investigated means of improved reporting of cfDNA yield by comparing quantitative PCR measurements of seven different reference gene assays in plasma samples and validating these with digital PCR. We noted that the cfDNA quantities based on measurement of some target genes (e.g. TERT) were, on average, more than twofold higher than those of other assays (e.g. ERV3). We conclude that analysis and averaging of multiple reference genes using a GeNorm approach gives a more reliable estimate of total cfDNA quantity. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4182654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41826542014-10-06 Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification Devonshire, Alison S. Whale, Alexandra S. Gutteridge, Alice Jones, Gerwyn Cowen, Simon Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. Anal Bioanal Chem Paper in Forefront Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequences in predominantly maternal cfDNA. Consequently, quality controls are required for measurement of extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and yield for validation of cfDNA methods. We evaluated the utility of an external DNA spike for monitoring these parameters in a study comparing three specific cfDNA extraction methods [QIAamp® circulating nucleic acid (CNA) kit, NucleoSpin® Plasma XS (NS) kit and FitAmp™ plasma/serum DNA isolation (FA) kit] with the commonly used QIAamp DNA blood mini (DBM) kit. We found that the extraction efficiencies of the kits ranked in the order CNA kit > DBM kit > NS kit > FA kit, and the CNA and NS kits gave a better representation of smaller DNA fragments in the extract than the DBM kit. We investigated means of improved reporting of cfDNA yield by comparing quantitative PCR measurements of seven different reference gene assays in plasma samples and validating these with digital PCR. We noted that the cfDNA quantities based on measurement of some target genes (e.g. TERT) were, on average, more than twofold higher than those of other assays (e.g. ERV3). We conclude that analysis and averaging of multiple reference genes using a GeNorm approach gives a more reliable estimate of total cfDNA quantity. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-05-24 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4182654/ /pubmed/24853859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Paper in Forefront
Devonshire, Alison S.
Whale, Alexandra S.
Gutteridge, Alice
Jones, Gerwyn
Cowen, Simon
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
title Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
title_full Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
title_fullStr Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
title_full_unstemmed Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
title_short Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
title_sort towards standardisation of cell-free dna measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
topic Paper in Forefront
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3
work_keys_str_mv AT devonshirealisons towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification
AT whalealexandras towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification
AT gutteridgealice towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification
AT jonesgerwyn towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification
AT cowensimon towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification
AT foycarolea towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification
AT huggettjimf towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification