Cargando…
Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3 |
_version_ | 1782337577437626368 |
---|---|
author | Devonshire, Alison S. Whale, Alexandra S. Gutteridge, Alice Jones, Gerwyn Cowen, Simon Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. |
author_facet | Devonshire, Alison S. Whale, Alexandra S. Gutteridge, Alice Jones, Gerwyn Cowen, Simon Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. |
author_sort | Devonshire, Alison S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequences in predominantly maternal cfDNA. Consequently, quality controls are required for measurement of extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and yield for validation of cfDNA methods. We evaluated the utility of an external DNA spike for monitoring these parameters in a study comparing three specific cfDNA extraction methods [QIAamp® circulating nucleic acid (CNA) kit, NucleoSpin® Plasma XS (NS) kit and FitAmp™ plasma/serum DNA isolation (FA) kit] with the commonly used QIAamp DNA blood mini (DBM) kit. We found that the extraction efficiencies of the kits ranked in the order CNA kit > DBM kit > NS kit > FA kit, and the CNA and NS kits gave a better representation of smaller DNA fragments in the extract than the DBM kit. We investigated means of improved reporting of cfDNA yield by comparing quantitative PCR measurements of seven different reference gene assays in plasma samples and validating these with digital PCR. We noted that the cfDNA quantities based on measurement of some target genes (e.g. TERT) were, on average, more than twofold higher than those of other assays (e.g. ERV3). We conclude that analysis and averaging of multiple reference genes using a GeNorm approach gives a more reliable estimate of total cfDNA quantity. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4182654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41826542014-10-06 Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification Devonshire, Alison S. Whale, Alexandra S. Gutteridge, Alice Jones, Gerwyn Cowen, Simon Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. Anal Bioanal Chem Paper in Forefront Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequences in predominantly maternal cfDNA. Consequently, quality controls are required for measurement of extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and yield for validation of cfDNA methods. We evaluated the utility of an external DNA spike for monitoring these parameters in a study comparing three specific cfDNA extraction methods [QIAamp® circulating nucleic acid (CNA) kit, NucleoSpin® Plasma XS (NS) kit and FitAmp™ plasma/serum DNA isolation (FA) kit] with the commonly used QIAamp DNA blood mini (DBM) kit. We found that the extraction efficiencies of the kits ranked in the order CNA kit > DBM kit > NS kit > FA kit, and the CNA and NS kits gave a better representation of smaller DNA fragments in the extract than the DBM kit. We investigated means of improved reporting of cfDNA yield by comparing quantitative PCR measurements of seven different reference gene assays in plasma samples and validating these with digital PCR. We noted that the cfDNA quantities based on measurement of some target genes (e.g. TERT) were, on average, more than twofold higher than those of other assays (e.g. ERV3). We conclude that analysis and averaging of multiple reference genes using a GeNorm approach gives a more reliable estimate of total cfDNA quantity. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-05-24 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4182654/ /pubmed/24853859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Paper in Forefront Devonshire, Alison S. Whale, Alexandra S. Gutteridge, Alice Jones, Gerwyn Cowen, Simon Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
title | Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
title_full | Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
title_fullStr | Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
title_short | Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
title_sort | towards standardisation of cell-free dna measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification |
topic | Paper in Forefront |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devonshirealisons towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification AT whalealexandras towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification AT gutteridgealice towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification AT jonesgerwyn towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification AT cowensimon towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification AT foycarolea towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification AT huggettjimf towardsstandardisationofcellfreednameasurementinplasmacontrolsforextractionefficiencyfragmentsizebiasandquantification |