Cargando…

Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review

BACKGROUND: Knowledge translation (KT) supports use of evidence in healthcare decision making but is not widely practiced. Mentoring is a promising means of developing KT capacity. The purpose of this scoping systematic review was to identify essential components of mentoring that could be adapted f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliardi, Anna R, Webster, Fiona, Perrier, Laure, Bell, Mary, Straus, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0122-z
_version_ 1782337602903343104
author Gagliardi, Anna R
Webster, Fiona
Perrier, Laure
Bell, Mary
Straus, Sharon
author_facet Gagliardi, Anna R
Webster, Fiona
Perrier, Laure
Bell, Mary
Straus, Sharon
author_sort Gagliardi, Anna R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge translation (KT) supports use of evidence in healthcare decision making but is not widely practiced. Mentoring is a promising means of developing KT capacity. The purpose of this scoping systematic review was to identify essential components of mentoring that could be adapted for KT mentorship. METHODS: Key social sciences and management databases were searched from January 2002 to December 2011 inclusive. Empirical research in non-healthcare settings that examined mentorship design and impact for improving job-specific knowledge and skill were eligible. Members of the study team independently selected eligible studies, and extracted and summarized data. RESULTS: Of 2,101 search results, 293 were retrieved and 13 studies were eligible for review. All but one reported improvements in knowledge, skill, or behavior. Mentoring program components included combining preliminary workshop-based training with individual mentoring provided either in person or remotely; training of mentors; and periodic mentoring for at least an hour over a minimum period of six months. Barriers included the need for infrastructure for recruitment, matching, and training; lack of clarity in mentoring goals; and limited satisfaction with mentors and their availability. Findings were analyzed against a conceptual framework of factors that influence mentoring design and impact to identify issues warranting further research. CONCLUSION: This study identified key mentoring components that could be adapted for KT mentorship. Overall, few studies were identified. Thus further research should explore whether and how mentoring should be tailored to baseline knowledge or skill and individual KT needs; evaluate newly developed or existing KT mentorship programs based on the factors identified here; and examine whether and how KT mentorship develops KT capacity. The conceptual framework could be used to develop or evaluate KT mentoring programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4182766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41827662014-10-03 Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review Gagliardi, Anna R Webster, Fiona Perrier, Laure Bell, Mary Straus, Sharon Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Knowledge translation (KT) supports use of evidence in healthcare decision making but is not widely practiced. Mentoring is a promising means of developing KT capacity. The purpose of this scoping systematic review was to identify essential components of mentoring that could be adapted for KT mentorship. METHODS: Key social sciences and management databases were searched from January 2002 to December 2011 inclusive. Empirical research in non-healthcare settings that examined mentorship design and impact for improving job-specific knowledge and skill were eligible. Members of the study team independently selected eligible studies, and extracted and summarized data. RESULTS: Of 2,101 search results, 293 were retrieved and 13 studies were eligible for review. All but one reported improvements in knowledge, skill, or behavior. Mentoring program components included combining preliminary workshop-based training with individual mentoring provided either in person or remotely; training of mentors; and periodic mentoring for at least an hour over a minimum period of six months. Barriers included the need for infrastructure for recruitment, matching, and training; lack of clarity in mentoring goals; and limited satisfaction with mentors and their availability. Findings were analyzed against a conceptual framework of factors that influence mentoring design and impact to identify issues warranting further research. CONCLUSION: This study identified key mentoring components that could be adapted for KT mentorship. Overall, few studies were identified. Thus further research should explore whether and how mentoring should be tailored to baseline knowledge or skill and individual KT needs; evaluate newly developed or existing KT mentorship programs based on the factors identified here; and examine whether and how KT mentorship develops KT capacity. The conceptual framework could be used to develop or evaluate KT mentoring programs. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4182766/ /pubmed/25252966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0122-z Text en © Gagliardi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gagliardi, Anna R
Webster, Fiona
Perrier, Laure
Bell, Mary
Straus, Sharon
Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
title Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
title_full Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
title_fullStr Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
title_short Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
title_sort exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0122-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gagliardiannar exploringmentorshipasastrategytobuildcapacityforknowledgetranslationresearchandpracticeascopingsystematicreview
AT websterfiona exploringmentorshipasastrategytobuildcapacityforknowledgetranslationresearchandpracticeascopingsystematicreview
AT perrierlaure exploringmentorshipasastrategytobuildcapacityforknowledgetranslationresearchandpracticeascopingsystematicreview
AT bellmary exploringmentorshipasastrategytobuildcapacityforknowledgetranslationresearchandpracticeascopingsystematicreview
AT straussharon exploringmentorshipasastrategytobuildcapacityforknowledgetranslationresearchandpracticeascopingsystematicreview