Cargando…
Practical considerations for volumetric wear analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties
OBJECTIVES: Wear debris released from bearing surfaces has been shown to provoke negative immune responses in the recipient. Excessive wear has been linked to early failure of prostheses. Analysis using coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) can provide estimates of total volumetric material loss of e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000249 |
_version_ | 1782337633084506112 |
---|---|
author | Langton, D. J. Sidaginamale, R. P. Holland, J. P. Deehan, D. Joyce, T. J. Nargol, A. V. F. Meek, R. D. Lord, J. K. |
author_facet | Langton, D. J. Sidaginamale, R. P. Holland, J. P. Deehan, D. Joyce, T. J. Nargol, A. V. F. Meek, R. D. Lord, J. K. |
author_sort | Langton, D. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Wear debris released from bearing surfaces has been shown to provoke negative immune responses in the recipient. Excessive wear has been linked to early failure of prostheses. Analysis using coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) can provide estimates of total volumetric material loss of explanted prostheses and can help to understand device failure. The accuracy of volumetric testing has been debated, with some investigators stating that only protocols involving hundreds of thousands of measurement points are sufficient. We looked to examine this assumption and to apply the findings to the clinical arena. METHODS: We examined the effects on the calculated material loss from a ceramic femoral head when different CMM scanning parameters were used. Calculated wear volumes were compared with gold standard gravimetric tests in a blinded study. RESULTS: Various scanning parameters including point pitch, maximum point to point distance, the number of scanning contours or the total number of points had no clinically relevant effect on volumetric wear calculations. Gravimetric testing showed that material loss can be calculated to provide clinically relevant degrees of accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic surfaces can be analysed accurately and rapidly with currently available technologies. Given these results, we believe that routine analysis of explanted hip components would be a feasible and logical extension to National Joint Registries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:60–8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4182907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41829072014-10-17 Practical considerations for volumetric wear analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties Langton, D. J. Sidaginamale, R. P. Holland, J. P. Deehan, D. Joyce, T. J. Nargol, A. V. F. Meek, R. D. Lord, J. K. Bone Joint Res Arthroplasty OBJECTIVES: Wear debris released from bearing surfaces has been shown to provoke negative immune responses in the recipient. Excessive wear has been linked to early failure of prostheses. Analysis using coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) can provide estimates of total volumetric material loss of explanted prostheses and can help to understand device failure. The accuracy of volumetric testing has been debated, with some investigators stating that only protocols involving hundreds of thousands of measurement points are sufficient. We looked to examine this assumption and to apply the findings to the clinical arena. METHODS: We examined the effects on the calculated material loss from a ceramic femoral head when different CMM scanning parameters were used. Calculated wear volumes were compared with gold standard gravimetric tests in a blinded study. RESULTS: Various scanning parameters including point pitch, maximum point to point distance, the number of scanning contours or the total number of points had no clinically relevant effect on volumetric wear calculations. Gravimetric testing showed that material loss can be calculated to provide clinically relevant degrees of accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic surfaces can be analysed accurately and rapidly with currently available technologies. Given these results, we believe that routine analysis of explanted hip components would be a feasible and logical extension to National Joint Registries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:60–8. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2014-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4182907/ /pubmed/24627327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000249 Text en ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Arthroplasty Langton, D. J. Sidaginamale, R. P. Holland, J. P. Deehan, D. Joyce, T. J. Nargol, A. V. F. Meek, R. D. Lord, J. K. Practical considerations for volumetric wear analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
title | Practical considerations for volumetric wear
analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
title_full | Practical considerations for volumetric wear
analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
title_fullStr | Practical considerations for volumetric wear
analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical considerations for volumetric wear
analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
title_short | Practical considerations for volumetric wear
analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
title_sort | practical considerations for volumetric wear
analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties |
topic | Arthroplasty |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langtondj practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT sidaginamalerp practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT hollandjp practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT deehand practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT joycetj practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT nargolavf practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT meekrd practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties AT lordjk practicalconsiderationsforvolumetricwearanalysisofexplantedhiparthroplasties |