Cargando…

Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis

BACKGROUND: Among the current instruments used to assess stair ambulation, none were observed that specifically evaluated the quality of movement or biomechanical strategies adopted by stroke patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content validity of a clinical instrument designed to identify the qual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natalio, Mavie A., Faria, Christina D. C. M., Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F., Michaelsen, Stella M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25054384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0052
_version_ 1782337677314490368
author Natalio, Mavie A.
Faria, Christina D. C. M.
Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
Michaelsen, Stella M.
author_facet Natalio, Mavie A.
Faria, Christina D. C. M.
Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
Michaelsen, Stella M.
author_sort Natalio, Mavie A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the current instruments used to assess stair ambulation, none were observed that specifically evaluated the quality of movement or biomechanical strategies adopted by stroke patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content validity of a clinical instrument designed to identify the qualitative and kinematic characteristics and strategies adopted by stroke patients during stair ascent and descent. METHOD: The first developed version, which comprised 80 items, had its content evaluated by an expert panel, which was composed of 9 well-known national and international professionals who are involved in stroke rehabilitation. The content validity index (CVI) and modified Kappa coefficients were employed for the statistical analyses. The items that demonstrated a CVI≥0.80 and Kappa≥0.75 were considered valid. RESULTS: The content validation was performed in three stages. The final version of the instrument consisted of 38 items, which were divided into descriptive (8 items), a General Characteristics Domain (16 items) and adopted strategies (14 items) during stair ascent and descent. The total scores ranged from zero to 70 and zero to 74 for ascent and descent, respectively. Lower scores corresponded with better performance. CONCLUSION: Despite the satisfactory results obtained during the process of content validation, other psychometric properties of the instrument are necessary and must be evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4183260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41832602014-10-23 Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis Natalio, Mavie A. Faria, Christina D. C. M. Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F. Michaelsen, Stella M. Braz J Phys Ther Original Articles BACKGROUND: Among the current instruments used to assess stair ambulation, none were observed that specifically evaluated the quality of movement or biomechanical strategies adopted by stroke patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content validity of a clinical instrument designed to identify the qualitative and kinematic characteristics and strategies adopted by stroke patients during stair ascent and descent. METHOD: The first developed version, which comprised 80 items, had its content evaluated by an expert panel, which was composed of 9 well-known national and international professionals who are involved in stroke rehabilitation. The content validity index (CVI) and modified Kappa coefficients were employed for the statistical analyses. The items that demonstrated a CVI≥0.80 and Kappa≥0.75 were considered valid. RESULTS: The content validation was performed in three stages. The final version of the instrument consisted of 38 items, which were divided into descriptive (8 items), a General Characteristics Domain (16 items) and adopted strategies (14 items) during stair ascent and descent. The total scores ranged from zero to 70 and zero to 74 for ascent and descent, respectively. Lower scores corresponded with better performance. CONCLUSION: Despite the satisfactory results obtained during the process of content validation, other psychometric properties of the instrument are necessary and must be evaluated. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4183260/ /pubmed/25054384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0052 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Natalio, Mavie A.
Faria, Christina D. C. M.
Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
Michaelsen, Stella M.
Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
title Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
title_full Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
title_fullStr Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
title_full_unstemmed Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
title_short Content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
title_sort content validation of a clinical assessment instrument for stair ascent and descent in individuals with hemiparesis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25054384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0052
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliomaviea contentvalidationofaclinicalassessmentinstrumentforstairascentanddescentinindividualswithhemiparesis
AT fariachristinadcm contentvalidationofaclinicalassessmentinstrumentforstairascentanddescentinindividualswithhemiparesis
AT teixeirasalmelalucif contentvalidationofaclinicalassessmentinstrumentforstairascentanddescentinindividualswithhemiparesis
AT michaelsenstellam contentvalidationofaclinicalassessmentinstrumentforstairascentanddescentinindividualswithhemiparesis