Cargando…

Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?

Here, we address the question of why some people have a greater chance of surviving and/or better resistance to cold-related-injuries in prolonged exposure to acute cold environments than do others, despite similar physical characteristics. The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brazaitis, Marius, Eimantas, Nerijus, Daniuseviciute, Laura, Mickeviciene, Dalia, Steponaviciute, Rasa, Skurvydas, Albertas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25275647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109020
_version_ 1782337703283523584
author Brazaitis, Marius
Eimantas, Nerijus
Daniuseviciute, Laura
Mickeviciene, Dalia
Steponaviciute, Rasa
Skurvydas, Albertas
author_facet Brazaitis, Marius
Eimantas, Nerijus
Daniuseviciute, Laura
Mickeviciene, Dalia
Steponaviciute, Rasa
Skurvydas, Albertas
author_sort Brazaitis, Marius
collection PubMed
description Here, we address the question of why some people have a greater chance of surviving and/or better resistance to cold-related-injuries in prolonged exposure to acute cold environments than do others, despite similar physical characteristics. The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and psychological reactions between people who exhibited fast cooling (FC; n = 20) or slow cooling (SC; n = 20) responses to cold water immersion. Individuals in whom the T(re) decreased to a set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were indicated as the FC group; individuals in whom the T(re) did not decrease to the set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were classified as the SC group. Cold stress was induced using intermittent immersion in bath water at 14°C. Motor (spinal and supraspinal reflexes, voluntary and electrically induced skeletal muscle contraction force) and cognitive (executive function, short term memory, short term spatial recognition) performance, immune variables (neutrophils, leucocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, IL-6, TNF-α), markers of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity (cortisol, corticosterone) and autonomic nervous system activity (epinephrine, norepinephrine) were monitored. The data obtained in this study suggest that the response of the FC group to cooling vs the SC group response was more likely an insulative–hypothermic response and that the SC vs the FC group displayed a metabolic–insulative response. The observations that an exposure time to 14°C cold water—which was nearly twice as short (96-min vs 170-min) with a greater rectal temperature decrease (35.5°C vs 36.2°C) in the FC group compared with the SC group—induces similar responses of motor, cognitive, and blood stress markers were novel. The most important finding is that subjects with a lower cold-strain-index (SC group) showed stimulation of some markers of innate immunity and suppression of markers of specific immunity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4183517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41835172014-10-07 Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? Brazaitis, Marius Eimantas, Nerijus Daniuseviciute, Laura Mickeviciene, Dalia Steponaviciute, Rasa Skurvydas, Albertas PLoS One Research Article Here, we address the question of why some people have a greater chance of surviving and/or better resistance to cold-related-injuries in prolonged exposure to acute cold environments than do others, despite similar physical characteristics. The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and psychological reactions between people who exhibited fast cooling (FC; n = 20) or slow cooling (SC; n = 20) responses to cold water immersion. Individuals in whom the T(re) decreased to a set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were indicated as the FC group; individuals in whom the T(re) did not decrease to the set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were classified as the SC group. Cold stress was induced using intermittent immersion in bath water at 14°C. Motor (spinal and supraspinal reflexes, voluntary and electrically induced skeletal muscle contraction force) and cognitive (executive function, short term memory, short term spatial recognition) performance, immune variables (neutrophils, leucocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, IL-6, TNF-α), markers of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity (cortisol, corticosterone) and autonomic nervous system activity (epinephrine, norepinephrine) were monitored. The data obtained in this study suggest that the response of the FC group to cooling vs the SC group response was more likely an insulative–hypothermic response and that the SC vs the FC group displayed a metabolic–insulative response. The observations that an exposure time to 14°C cold water—which was nearly twice as short (96-min vs 170-min) with a greater rectal temperature decrease (35.5°C vs 36.2°C) in the FC group compared with the SC group—induces similar responses of motor, cognitive, and blood stress markers were novel. The most important finding is that subjects with a lower cold-strain-index (SC group) showed stimulation of some markers of innate immunity and suppression of markers of specific immunity. Public Library of Science 2014-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4183517/ /pubmed/25275647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109020 Text en © 2014 Brazaitis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brazaitis, Marius
Eimantas, Nerijus
Daniuseviciute, Laura
Mickeviciene, Dalia
Steponaviciute, Rasa
Skurvydas, Albertas
Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
title Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
title_full Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
title_fullStr Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
title_full_unstemmed Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
title_short Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
title_sort two strategies for response to 14°c cold-water immersion: is there a difference in the response of motor, cognitive, immune and stress markers?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25275647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109020
work_keys_str_mv AT brazaitismarius twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers
AT eimantasnerijus twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers
AT daniuseviciutelaura twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers
AT mickevicienedalia twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers
AT steponaviciuterasa twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers
AT skurvydasalbertas twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers