Cargando…
Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers?
Here, we address the question of why some people have a greater chance of surviving and/or better resistance to cold-related-injuries in prolonged exposure to acute cold environments than do others, despite similar physical characteristics. The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25275647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109020 |
_version_ | 1782337703283523584 |
---|---|
author | Brazaitis, Marius Eimantas, Nerijus Daniuseviciute, Laura Mickeviciene, Dalia Steponaviciute, Rasa Skurvydas, Albertas |
author_facet | Brazaitis, Marius Eimantas, Nerijus Daniuseviciute, Laura Mickeviciene, Dalia Steponaviciute, Rasa Skurvydas, Albertas |
author_sort | Brazaitis, Marius |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we address the question of why some people have a greater chance of surviving and/or better resistance to cold-related-injuries in prolonged exposure to acute cold environments than do others, despite similar physical characteristics. The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and psychological reactions between people who exhibited fast cooling (FC; n = 20) or slow cooling (SC; n = 20) responses to cold water immersion. Individuals in whom the T(re) decreased to a set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were indicated as the FC group; individuals in whom the T(re) did not decrease to the set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were classified as the SC group. Cold stress was induced using intermittent immersion in bath water at 14°C. Motor (spinal and supraspinal reflexes, voluntary and electrically induced skeletal muscle contraction force) and cognitive (executive function, short term memory, short term spatial recognition) performance, immune variables (neutrophils, leucocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, IL-6, TNF-α), markers of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity (cortisol, corticosterone) and autonomic nervous system activity (epinephrine, norepinephrine) were monitored. The data obtained in this study suggest that the response of the FC group to cooling vs the SC group response was more likely an insulative–hypothermic response and that the SC vs the FC group displayed a metabolic–insulative response. The observations that an exposure time to 14°C cold water—which was nearly twice as short (96-min vs 170-min) with a greater rectal temperature decrease (35.5°C vs 36.2°C) in the FC group compared with the SC group—induces similar responses of motor, cognitive, and blood stress markers were novel. The most important finding is that subjects with a lower cold-strain-index (SC group) showed stimulation of some markers of innate immunity and suppression of markers of specific immunity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4183517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41835172014-10-07 Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? Brazaitis, Marius Eimantas, Nerijus Daniuseviciute, Laura Mickeviciene, Dalia Steponaviciute, Rasa Skurvydas, Albertas PLoS One Research Article Here, we address the question of why some people have a greater chance of surviving and/or better resistance to cold-related-injuries in prolonged exposure to acute cold environments than do others, despite similar physical characteristics. The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and psychological reactions between people who exhibited fast cooling (FC; n = 20) or slow cooling (SC; n = 20) responses to cold water immersion. Individuals in whom the T(re) decreased to a set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were indicated as the FC group; individuals in whom the T(re) did not decrease to the set point of 35.5°C before the end of the 170-min cooling time were classified as the SC group. Cold stress was induced using intermittent immersion in bath water at 14°C. Motor (spinal and supraspinal reflexes, voluntary and electrically induced skeletal muscle contraction force) and cognitive (executive function, short term memory, short term spatial recognition) performance, immune variables (neutrophils, leucocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, IL-6, TNF-α), markers of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity (cortisol, corticosterone) and autonomic nervous system activity (epinephrine, norepinephrine) were monitored. The data obtained in this study suggest that the response of the FC group to cooling vs the SC group response was more likely an insulative–hypothermic response and that the SC vs the FC group displayed a metabolic–insulative response. The observations that an exposure time to 14°C cold water—which was nearly twice as short (96-min vs 170-min) with a greater rectal temperature decrease (35.5°C vs 36.2°C) in the FC group compared with the SC group—induces similar responses of motor, cognitive, and blood stress markers were novel. The most important finding is that subjects with a lower cold-strain-index (SC group) showed stimulation of some markers of innate immunity and suppression of markers of specific immunity. Public Library of Science 2014-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4183517/ /pubmed/25275647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109020 Text en © 2014 Brazaitis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brazaitis, Marius Eimantas, Nerijus Daniuseviciute, Laura Mickeviciene, Dalia Steponaviciute, Rasa Skurvydas, Albertas Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? |
title | Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? |
title_full | Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? |
title_fullStr | Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? |
title_full_unstemmed | Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? |
title_short | Two Strategies for Response to 14°C Cold-Water Immersion: Is there a Difference in the Response of Motor, Cognitive, Immune and Stress Markers? |
title_sort | two strategies for response to 14°c cold-water immersion: is there a difference in the response of motor, cognitive, immune and stress markers? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25275647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brazaitismarius twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers AT eimantasnerijus twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers AT daniuseviciutelaura twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers AT mickevicienedalia twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers AT steponaviciuterasa twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers AT skurvydasalbertas twostrategiesforresponseto14ccoldwaterimmersionisthereadifferenceintheresponseofmotorcognitiveimmuneandstressmarkers |