Cargando…

Redefining high-risk patients with stage II colon cancer by risk index and microRNA-21: results from a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to analyse the prognostic value of microRNA-21 (miRNA-21) in patients with stage II colon cancer aiming at a risk index for this group of patients. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 554 patients was included. MicroRNA-21 was analysed by qPCR based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, T F, Kjær-Frifeldt, S, Christensen, R D, Morgenthaler, S, Blondal, T, Lindebjerg, J, Sørensen, F B, Jakobsen, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25051407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.409
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to analyse the prognostic value of microRNA-21 (miRNA-21) in patients with stage II colon cancer aiming at a risk index for this group of patients. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 554 patients was included. MicroRNA-21 was analysed by qPCR based on tumour tissue. An index was created using the coefficients obtained from a collective multiple Cox regression. The entire procedure was cross-validated (10-fold). The performance of the index was quantified by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: High miRNA-21 expression was associated with an unfavourable recurrence-free cancer-specific survival (RF-CSS), hazard ratio 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.76) (P=0.028). The generated RF-CSS index divided the traditional high-risk patients into subgroups with 5-year RF-CSS rates of 87% and 73%, respectively (P<0.001). The overall survival (OS) index identified three different subgroups (P<0.001). Cross-validated 5-year OS rates were 88%, 68%, and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study supports miRNA-21 as an additional prognostic biomarker in patients with stage II colon cancer. Furthermore, the introduction of a risk index may guide the use of postoperative adjuvant treatment in a more appropriate way compared with current practice.