Cargando…

Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the peroneal nerve test (PENT) in the diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) and myopathy (CIM) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesised that abnormal reduction of peroneal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude predicts CIP/CIM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latronico, Nicola, Nattino, Giovanni, Guarneri, Bruno, Fagoni, Nazzareno, Amantini, Aldo, Bertolini, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4184363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309729
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3933.3
_version_ 1782337833249275904
author Latronico, Nicola
Nattino, Giovanni
Guarneri, Bruno
Fagoni, Nazzareno
Amantini, Aldo
Bertolini, Guido
author_facet Latronico, Nicola
Nattino, Giovanni
Guarneri, Bruno
Fagoni, Nazzareno
Amantini, Aldo
Bertolini, Guido
author_sort Latronico, Nicola
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the peroneal nerve test (PENT) in the diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) and myopathy (CIM) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesised that abnormal reduction of peroneal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude predicts CIP/CIM diagnosed using a complete nerve conduction study and electromyography (NCS-EMG) as a reference diagnostic standard. Design: prospective observational study. Setting: Nine Italian ICUs. Patients: One-hundred and twenty-one adult (≥18 years) neurologic (106) and non-neurologic (15) critically ill patients with an ICU stay of at least 3 days. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: Patients underwent PENT and NCS-EMG testing on the same day conducted by two independent clinicians who were blind to the results of the other test. Cases were considered as true negative if both NCS-EMG and PENT measurements were normal. Cases were considered as true positive if the PENT result was abnormal and NCS-EMG showed symmetric abnormal findings, independently from the specific diagnosis by NCS-EMG (CIP, CIM, or combined CIP and CIM). All data were centrally reviewed and diagnoses were evaluated for consistency with predefined electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for CIP/CIM. During the study period, 342 patients were evaluated, 124 (36.3%) were enrolled and 121 individuals with no protocol violation were studied. Sensitivity and specificity of PENT were 100% (95% CI 96.1-100.0) and 85.2% (95% CI 66.3-95.8). Of 23 patients with normal results, all presented normal values on both tests with no false negative results. Of 97 patients with abnormal results, 93 had abnormal values on both tests (true positive), whereas four with abnormal findings with PENT had only single peroneal nerve neuropathy at complete NCS-EMG (false positive). Conclusions: PENT has 100% sensitivity and high specificity, and can be used as a screening test to diagnose CIP/CIM in the ICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4184363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41843632014-10-09 Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study Latronico, Nicola Nattino, Giovanni Guarneri, Bruno Fagoni, Nazzareno Amantini, Aldo Bertolini, Guido F1000Res Research Article Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the peroneal nerve test (PENT) in the diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) and myopathy (CIM) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesised that abnormal reduction of peroneal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude predicts CIP/CIM diagnosed using a complete nerve conduction study and electromyography (NCS-EMG) as a reference diagnostic standard. Design: prospective observational study. Setting: Nine Italian ICUs. Patients: One-hundred and twenty-one adult (≥18 years) neurologic (106) and non-neurologic (15) critically ill patients with an ICU stay of at least 3 days. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: Patients underwent PENT and NCS-EMG testing on the same day conducted by two independent clinicians who were blind to the results of the other test. Cases were considered as true negative if both NCS-EMG and PENT measurements were normal. Cases were considered as true positive if the PENT result was abnormal and NCS-EMG showed symmetric abnormal findings, independently from the specific diagnosis by NCS-EMG (CIP, CIM, or combined CIP and CIM). All data were centrally reviewed and diagnoses were evaluated for consistency with predefined electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for CIP/CIM. During the study period, 342 patients were evaluated, 124 (36.3%) were enrolled and 121 individuals with no protocol violation were studied. Sensitivity and specificity of PENT were 100% (95% CI 96.1-100.0) and 85.2% (95% CI 66.3-95.8). Of 23 patients with normal results, all presented normal values on both tests with no false negative results. Of 97 patients with abnormal results, 93 had abnormal values on both tests (true positive), whereas four with abnormal findings with PENT had only single peroneal nerve neuropathy at complete NCS-EMG (false positive). Conclusions: PENT has 100% sensitivity and high specificity, and can be used as a screening test to diagnose CIP/CIM in the ICU. F1000Research 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4184363/ /pubmed/25309729 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3933.3 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Latronico N et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
spellingShingle Research Article
Latronico, Nicola
Nattino, Giovanni
Guarneri, Bruno
Fagoni, Nazzareno
Amantini, Aldo
Bertolini, Guido
Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study
title Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study
title_full Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study
title_short Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre italian crimyne-2 diagnostic accuracy study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4184363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309729
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3933.3
work_keys_str_mv AT latroniconicola validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy
AT nattinogiovanni validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy
AT guarneribruno validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy
AT fagoninazzareno validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy
AT amantinialdo validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy
AT bertoliniguido validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy
AT validationoftheperonealnervetesttodiagnosecriticalillnesspolyneuropathyandmyopathyintheintensivecareunitthemulticentreitaliancrimyne2diagnosticaccuracystudy