Cargando…

Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive evaluation of central venous pressure (CVP) can be achieved by assessing the Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP), Peripheral Venous Collapse (PVC), and ultrasound visualization of the inferior vena cava. The relative accuracy of these techniques compared to one another and their ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizkallah, Jacques, Jack, Megan, Saeed, Mahwash, Shafer, Leigh Anne, Vo, Minh, Tam, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4184858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109215
_version_ 1782337930527768576
author Rizkallah, Jacques
Jack, Megan
Saeed, Mahwash
Shafer, Leigh Anne
Vo, Minh
Tam, James
author_facet Rizkallah, Jacques
Jack, Megan
Saeed, Mahwash
Shafer, Leigh Anne
Vo, Minh
Tam, James
author_sort Rizkallah, Jacques
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noninvasive evaluation of central venous pressure (CVP) can be achieved by assessing the Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP), Peripheral Venous Collapse (PVC), and ultrasound visualization of the inferior vena cava. The relative accuracy of these techniques compared to one another and their application by trainees of varying experience remains uncertain. We compare the application and utility of the JVP, PVC, and handheld Mini Echo amongst trainees of varying experience including a medical student, internal medicine resident, and cardiology fellow. We also introduce and validate a new physical exam technique to assess central venous pressures, the Anthem sign. METHODS: Patients presenting for their regularly scheduled echocardiograms at the hospital echo department had clinical evaluations of their CVP using these non-invasive bedside techniques. The examiners were blinded to the echo results, each other's assessments, and patient history; their CVP estimates were compared to the gold standard level 3 echo-cardiographer's estimates at the completion of the study. RESULTS: 325 patients combined were examined (mean age 65, s.d. 16 years). When compared to the gold standard of central venous pressure by a level 3 echocardiographer, the JVP was the most sensitive at 86%, improving with clinical experience (p<0.01). The classic PVC technique and Anthem sign had better specificity compared to the JVP. Mini Echo estimates were comparable to physical exam assessments. CONCLUSIONS: JVP evaluation is the most sensitive physical examination technique in CVP assessments. The PVC techniques along with the newly described Anthem sign may be of value for the early learner who still has not mastered the art of JVP assessment and in obese patients in whom JVP evaluation is problematic. Mini Echo estimates of CVPs are comparable to physical examination by trained clinicians and require less instruction. The use of Mini Echo in medical training should be further evaluated and encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4184858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41848582014-10-07 Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future Rizkallah, Jacques Jack, Megan Saeed, Mahwash Shafer, Leigh Anne Vo, Minh Tam, James PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Noninvasive evaluation of central venous pressure (CVP) can be achieved by assessing the Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP), Peripheral Venous Collapse (PVC), and ultrasound visualization of the inferior vena cava. The relative accuracy of these techniques compared to one another and their application by trainees of varying experience remains uncertain. We compare the application and utility of the JVP, PVC, and handheld Mini Echo amongst trainees of varying experience including a medical student, internal medicine resident, and cardiology fellow. We also introduce and validate a new physical exam technique to assess central venous pressures, the Anthem sign. METHODS: Patients presenting for their regularly scheduled echocardiograms at the hospital echo department had clinical evaluations of their CVP using these non-invasive bedside techniques. The examiners were blinded to the echo results, each other's assessments, and patient history; their CVP estimates were compared to the gold standard level 3 echo-cardiographer's estimates at the completion of the study. RESULTS: 325 patients combined were examined (mean age 65, s.d. 16 years). When compared to the gold standard of central venous pressure by a level 3 echocardiographer, the JVP was the most sensitive at 86%, improving with clinical experience (p<0.01). The classic PVC technique and Anthem sign had better specificity compared to the JVP. Mini Echo estimates were comparable to physical exam assessments. CONCLUSIONS: JVP evaluation is the most sensitive physical examination technique in CVP assessments. The PVC techniques along with the newly described Anthem sign may be of value for the early learner who still has not mastered the art of JVP assessment and in obese patients in whom JVP evaluation is problematic. Mini Echo estimates of CVPs are comparable to physical examination by trained clinicians and require less instruction. The use of Mini Echo in medical training should be further evaluated and encouraged. Public Library of Science 2014-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4184858/ /pubmed/25279995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109215 Text en © 2014 Rizkallah et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rizkallah, Jacques
Jack, Megan
Saeed, Mahwash
Shafer, Leigh Anne
Vo, Minh
Tam, James
Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future
title Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future
title_full Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future
title_short Non-Invasive Bedside Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Scanning into the Future
title_sort non-invasive bedside assessment of central venous pressure: scanning into the future
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4184858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109215
work_keys_str_mv AT rizkallahjacques noninvasivebedsideassessmentofcentralvenouspressurescanningintothefuture
AT jackmegan noninvasivebedsideassessmentofcentralvenouspressurescanningintothefuture
AT saeedmahwash noninvasivebedsideassessmentofcentralvenouspressurescanningintothefuture
AT shaferleighanne noninvasivebedsideassessmentofcentralvenouspressurescanningintothefuture
AT vominh noninvasivebedsideassessmentofcentralvenouspressurescanningintothefuture
AT tamjames noninvasivebedsideassessmentofcentralvenouspressurescanningintothefuture