Cargando…

Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors (PEs) in three mental health hospitals. SETTING: Inpatient units in three National Health Service (NHS) mental health hospitals in the North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Trained clinical pharmacists prospectively r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keers, Richard N, Williams, Steven D, Vattakatuchery, Joe J, Brown, Petra, Miller, Joan, Prescott, Lorraine, Ashcroft, Darren M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006084
_version_ 1782337966822129664
author Keers, Richard N
Williams, Steven D
Vattakatuchery, Joe J
Brown, Petra
Miller, Joan
Prescott, Lorraine
Ashcroft, Darren M
author_facet Keers, Richard N
Williams, Steven D
Vattakatuchery, Joe J
Brown, Petra
Miller, Joan
Prescott, Lorraine
Ashcroft, Darren M
author_sort Keers, Richard N
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors (PEs) in three mental health hospitals. SETTING: Inpatient units in three National Health Service (NHS) mental health hospitals in the North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Trained clinical pharmacists prospectively recorded the number of PEs in newly written or omitted prescription items screened during their routine work on 10 data collection days. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed PE data using established methods to confirm (1) the presence of a PE, (2) the type of PE and (3) whether errors were clinically relevant and likely to cause harm. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency, nature and predictors of PEs. RESULTS: Of 4427 screened prescription items, 281 were found to have one or more PEs (error rate 6.3% (95% CI 5.6 to 7.1%)). Multivariate analysis revealed that specialty trainees (OR 1.23 (1.01 to 1.51)) and staff grade psychiatrists (OR 1.50 (1.05 to 2.13)) were more likely to make PEs when compared to foundation year (FY) one doctors, and that specialty trainees and consultant psychiatrists were twice as likely to make clinically relevant PEs (OR 2.61 (2.11 to 3.22) and 2.03 (1.66 to 2.50), respectively) compared to FY one staff. Prescription items screened during the prescription chart rewrite (OR 0.52 (0.33 to 0.82)) or at discharge (OR 0.87 (0.79 to 0.97)) were less likely to be associated with PEs than items assessed during inpatient stay, although they were more likely to be associated with clinically relevant PEs (OR 2.27 (1.72 to 2.99) and 4.23 (3.68 to 4.87), respectively). Prescription items screened at hospital admission were five times more likely (OR 5.39 (2.72 to 10.69)) to be associated with clinically relevant errors than those screened during patient stay. CONCLUSIONS: PEs may be more common in mental health hospitals than previously reported and important targets to minimise these errors have been identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4185335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41853352014-10-08 Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study Keers, Richard N Williams, Steven D Vattakatuchery, Joe J Brown, Petra Miller, Joan Prescott, Lorraine Ashcroft, Darren M BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors (PEs) in three mental health hospitals. SETTING: Inpatient units in three National Health Service (NHS) mental health hospitals in the North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Trained clinical pharmacists prospectively recorded the number of PEs in newly written or omitted prescription items screened during their routine work on 10 data collection days. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed PE data using established methods to confirm (1) the presence of a PE, (2) the type of PE and (3) whether errors were clinically relevant and likely to cause harm. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency, nature and predictors of PEs. RESULTS: Of 4427 screened prescription items, 281 were found to have one or more PEs (error rate 6.3% (95% CI 5.6 to 7.1%)). Multivariate analysis revealed that specialty trainees (OR 1.23 (1.01 to 1.51)) and staff grade psychiatrists (OR 1.50 (1.05 to 2.13)) were more likely to make PEs when compared to foundation year (FY) one doctors, and that specialty trainees and consultant psychiatrists were twice as likely to make clinically relevant PEs (OR 2.61 (2.11 to 3.22) and 2.03 (1.66 to 2.50), respectively) compared to FY one staff. Prescription items screened during the prescription chart rewrite (OR 0.52 (0.33 to 0.82)) or at discharge (OR 0.87 (0.79 to 0.97)) were less likely to be associated with PEs than items assessed during inpatient stay, although they were more likely to be associated with clinically relevant PEs (OR 2.27 (1.72 to 2.99) and 4.23 (3.68 to 4.87), respectively). Prescription items screened at hospital admission were five times more likely (OR 5.39 (2.72 to 10.69)) to be associated with clinically relevant errors than those screened during patient stay. CONCLUSIONS: PEs may be more common in mental health hospitals than previously reported and important targets to minimise these errors have been identified. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4185335/ /pubmed/25273813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006084 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Keers, Richard N
Williams, Steven D
Vattakatuchery, Joe J
Brown, Petra
Miller, Joan
Prescott, Lorraine
Ashcroft, Darren M
Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
title Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
title_full Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
title_fullStr Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
title_short Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
title_sort prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006084
work_keys_str_mv AT keersrichardn prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT williamsstevend prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT vattakatucheryjoej prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT brownpetra prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT millerjoan prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT prescottlorraine prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT ashcroftdarrenm prevalencenatureandpredictorsofprescribingerrorsinmentalhealthhospitalsaprospectivemulticentrestudy