Cargando…

Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation

Quantifying the impact of biochemical compounds on collective cell spreading is an essential element of drug design, with various applications including developing treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Scratch assays are a technically simple and inexpensive method used to study collective cell s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnston, Stuart T., Simpson, Matthew J., McElwain, D. L. Sean, Binder, Benjamin J., Ross, Joshua V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25209532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.140097
_version_ 1782337977047842816
author Johnston, Stuart T.
Simpson, Matthew J.
McElwain, D. L. Sean
Binder, Benjamin J.
Ross, Joshua V.
author_facet Johnston, Stuart T.
Simpson, Matthew J.
McElwain, D. L. Sean
Binder, Benjamin J.
Ross, Joshua V.
author_sort Johnston, Stuart T.
collection PubMed
description Quantifying the impact of biochemical compounds on collective cell spreading is an essential element of drug design, with various applications including developing treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Scratch assays are a technically simple and inexpensive method used to study collective cell spreading; however, most previous interpretations of scratch assays are qualitative and do not provide estimates of the cell diffusivity, D, or the cell proliferation rate, λ. Estimating D and λ is important for investigating the efficacy of a potential treatment and provides insight into the mechanism through which the potential treatment acts. While a few methods for estimating D and λ have been proposed, these previous methods lead to point estimates of D and λ, and provide no insight into the uncertainty in these estimates. Here, we compare various types of information that can be extracted from images of a scratch assay, and quantify D and λ using discrete computational simulations and approximate Bayesian computation. We show that it is possible to robustly recover estimates of D and λ from synthetic data, as well as a new set of experimental data. For the first time, our approach also provides a method to estimate the uncertainty in our estimates of D and λ. We anticipate that our approach can be generalized to deal with more realistic experimental scenarios in which we are interested in estimating D and λ, as well as additional relevant parameters such as the strength of cell-to-cell adhesion or the strength of cell-to-substrate adhesion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4185435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41854352014-10-14 Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation Johnston, Stuart T. Simpson, Matthew J. McElwain, D. L. Sean Binder, Benjamin J. Ross, Joshua V. Open Biol Research Quantifying the impact of biochemical compounds on collective cell spreading is an essential element of drug design, with various applications including developing treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Scratch assays are a technically simple and inexpensive method used to study collective cell spreading; however, most previous interpretations of scratch assays are qualitative and do not provide estimates of the cell diffusivity, D, or the cell proliferation rate, λ. Estimating D and λ is important for investigating the efficacy of a potential treatment and provides insight into the mechanism through which the potential treatment acts. While a few methods for estimating D and λ have been proposed, these previous methods lead to point estimates of D and λ, and provide no insight into the uncertainty in these estimates. Here, we compare various types of information that can be extracted from images of a scratch assay, and quantify D and λ using discrete computational simulations and approximate Bayesian computation. We show that it is possible to robustly recover estimates of D and λ from synthetic data, as well as a new set of experimental data. For the first time, our approach also provides a method to estimate the uncertainty in our estimates of D and λ. We anticipate that our approach can be generalized to deal with more realistic experimental scenarios in which we are interested in estimating D and λ, as well as additional relevant parameters such as the strength of cell-to-cell adhesion or the strength of cell-to-substrate adhesion. The Royal Society 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4185435/ /pubmed/25209532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.140097 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2014 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Johnston, Stuart T.
Simpson, Matthew J.
McElwain, D. L. Sean
Binder, Benjamin J.
Ross, Joshua V.
Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_full Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_fullStr Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_short Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_sort interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate bayesian computation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25209532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.140097
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonstuartt interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT simpsonmatthewj interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT mcelwaindlsean interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT binderbenjaminj interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT rossjoshuav interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation