Cargando…

A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare communication patterns in calls subjected to a malpractice claim with matched controls. SETTING: In many countries, telephone advice nursing is patients’ first contact with healthcare. Telenurses’ assessment of callers’ symptoms and needs are based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernesäter, Annica, Engström, Maria, Winblad, Ulrika, Holmström, Inger K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4187455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005961
_version_ 1782338174495752192
author Ernesäter, Annica
Engström, Maria
Winblad, Ulrika
Holmström, Inger K
author_facet Ernesäter, Annica
Engström, Maria
Winblad, Ulrika
Holmström, Inger K
author_sort Ernesäter, Annica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare communication patterns in calls subjected to a malpractice claim with matched controls. SETTING: In many countries, telephone advice nursing is patients’ first contact with healthcare. Telenurses’ assessment of callers’ symptoms and needs are based on verbal communication only, and problems with over-triage and under-triage have been reported. PARTICIPANTS: A total sample of all reported medical errors (n=33) during the period 2003–2010 within Swedish Healthcare Direct was retrieved. Corresponding calls were thereafter identified and collected as sound files from the manager in charge at the respective call centres. For technical reasons, calls from four of the cases were not possible to retrieve. For the present study, matched control calls (n=26) based on the patient's age, gender and main symptom presented by the caller were collected. RESULTS: Male patients were in majority (n=16), and the most common reasons for calling were abdominal pain (n=10) and chest pain (n=5). There were statistically significant differences between the communication in the cases and controls: telenurses used fewer open-ended medical questions (p<0.001) in the cases compared to the control calls; callers provided telenurses with more medical information in the control calls compared to the cases (p=0.001); and telenurses used more facilitation and patient activation activities in the control calls (p=0.034), such as back-channel response (p=0.001), compared to the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that telenurses in malpractice claimed calls used more closed-ended questioning compared to those in control calls, who used more open-ended questioning and back-channel response, which provided them with richer medical descriptions and more information from the caller. Hence, these communicative techniques are important in addition to solid medical and nursing competence and sound decision aid systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4187455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41874552014-10-08 A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study Ernesäter, Annica Engström, Maria Winblad, Ulrika Holmström, Inger K BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare communication patterns in calls subjected to a malpractice claim with matched controls. SETTING: In many countries, telephone advice nursing is patients’ first contact with healthcare. Telenurses’ assessment of callers’ symptoms and needs are based on verbal communication only, and problems with over-triage and under-triage have been reported. PARTICIPANTS: A total sample of all reported medical errors (n=33) during the period 2003–2010 within Swedish Healthcare Direct was retrieved. Corresponding calls were thereafter identified and collected as sound files from the manager in charge at the respective call centres. For technical reasons, calls from four of the cases were not possible to retrieve. For the present study, matched control calls (n=26) based on the patient's age, gender and main symptom presented by the caller were collected. RESULTS: Male patients were in majority (n=16), and the most common reasons for calling were abdominal pain (n=10) and chest pain (n=5). There were statistically significant differences between the communication in the cases and controls: telenurses used fewer open-ended medical questions (p<0.001) in the cases compared to the control calls; callers provided telenurses with more medical information in the control calls compared to the cases (p=0.001); and telenurses used more facilitation and patient activation activities in the control calls (p=0.034), such as back-channel response (p=0.001), compared to the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that telenurses in malpractice claimed calls used more closed-ended questioning compared to those in control calls, who used more open-ended questioning and back-channel response, which provided them with richer medical descriptions and more information from the caller. Hence, these communicative techniques are important in addition to solid medical and nursing competence and sound decision aid systems. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4187455/ /pubmed/25280808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005961 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Ernesäter, Annica
Engström, Maria
Winblad, Ulrika
Holmström, Inger K
A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study
title A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study
title_full A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study
title_fullStr A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study
title_short A comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a case–control study
title_sort comparison of calls subjected to a malpractice claim versus ‘normal calls’ within the swedish healthcare direct: a case–control study
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4187455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005961
work_keys_str_mv AT ernesaterannica acomparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT engstrommaria acomparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT winbladulrika acomparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT holmstromingerk acomparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT ernesaterannica comparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT engstrommaria comparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT winbladulrika comparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy
AT holmstromingerk comparisonofcallssubjectedtoamalpracticeclaimversusnormalcallswithintheswedishhealthcaredirectacasecontrolstudy