Cargando…

Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study

INTRODUCTION: The validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis depends on methodological quality and unbiased dissemination of trials. Our objective is to evaluate the association of estimates of treatment effects with different bias-related study characteristics in meta-analyses of intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hansen, Julie B, Juhl, Carsten B, Boutron, Isabelle, Tugwell, Peter, Ghogomu, Elizabeth A T, Pardo Pardo, Jordi, Rader, Tamara, Wells, George A, Mayhew, Alain, Maxwell, Lara, Lund, Hans, Christensen, Robin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:	Epidemiology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4187994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005491

Ejemplares similares

Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design
por: Bertizzolo, Lorenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
por: Mayhew, Alain D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
por: Tomlinson, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessing the effect of interventions for axial spondyloarthritis according to the endorsed ASAS/OMERACT core outcome set: a meta-research study of trials included in Cochrane reviews
por: Andreasen, Rikke A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evidence for non-communicable diseases: analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification
por: Heneghan, C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups
por: Reid, Emma K, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
por: Stacey, Dawn, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries
por: Houlding-Braunberger, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Soft drink intake and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative
por: Lu, Bing, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol
por: Dossing, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessing the impact of the phase-out measures during COVID-19 pandemic, using regression models: a longitudinal observational study
por: Pardo, Maria Carmen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Are more observational studies being included in Cochrane Reviews?
por: Kongsted, Hans Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Sensitivity analysis of selection bias: a graphical display by bias-correction index
por: Chung, Ping-Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

PROTOCOL: Interactive social media interventions for health behaviour change, health outcomes, and health equity in the adult population
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Probabilistic Quantification of Bias to Combine the Strengths of Population-Based Register Data and Clinical Cohorts—Studying Mortality in Osteoarthritis
por: Turkiewicz, Aleksandra, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cochrane Cameroon: bringing Cochrane to francophone sub-Saharan Africa
por: Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial
por: Jankowski, Sofyan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Hierarchy of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Meta-Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: Empirical Evidence from a Survey of High Impact Journals
por: Juhl, Carsten, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Is there a causal link between knee loading and knee osteoarthritis progression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and randomised trials
por: Henriksen, Marius, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Behavior Change Techniques Included in Reports of Social Media Interventions for Promoting Health Behaviors in Adults: Content Analysis Within a Systematic Review
por: Simeon, Rosiane, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The value of including boys in an HPV vaccination programme: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a low-resource setting
por: Kim, J J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture
por: Kim, Kun Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Confidence in the dynamic spread of epidemics under biased sampling conditions
por: Brunner, James, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Which patients are not included in the English Cancer Waiting Times monitoring dataset, 2009–2013? Implications for use of the data in research
por: Di Girolamo, C, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

PROTOCOL: When and how to replicate systematic reviews
por: Karunananthan, Sathya, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Chinese primary knee osteoarthritis progression cohort (CPKOPC) to evaluate the progression of knee osteoarthritis in the Beijing population: a prospective cohort study protocol
por: Zhao, Minwei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Religious attendance after elevated depressive symptoms: is selection bias at work?
por: Balbuena, Lloyd, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Mortality Outcomes in Dermatology: An Exploration of Core Outcome Sets and Cochrane Skin Systematic Reviews
por: Sivesind, Torunn E, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies
por: Yaffe, Joanne, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is publication bias present in gastroenterological research? An analysis of abstracts presented at an annual congress
por: Meyer, Chase, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_gmlai32heb9qbrv1mf5muqcv38