Cargando…

Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data

Accurate crystal structures of macromolecules are of high importance in the biological and biomedical fields. Models of crystal structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are in general of very high quality as deposited. However, methods for obtaining the best model of a macromolecular structure from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terwilliger, Thomas C., Bricogne, Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25286839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714017040
_version_ 1782338205212737536
author Terwilliger, Thomas C.
Bricogne, Gerard
author_facet Terwilliger, Thomas C.
Bricogne, Gerard
author_sort Terwilliger, Thomas C.
collection PubMed
description Accurate crystal structures of macromolecules are of high importance in the biological and biomedical fields. Models of crystal structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are in general of very high quality as deposited. However, methods for obtaining the best model of a macromolecular structure from a given set of experimental X-ray data continue to progress at a rapid pace, making it possible to improve most PDB entries after their deposition by re-analyzing the original deposited data with more recent software. This possibility represents a very significant departure from the situation that prevailed when the PDB was created, when it was envisioned as a cumulative repository of static contents. A radical paradigm shift for the PDB is therefore proposed, away from the static archive model towards a much more dynamic body of continuously improving results in symbiosis with continuously improving methods and software. These simultaneous improvements in methods and final results are made possible by the current deposition of processed crystallographic data (structure-factor amplitudes) and will be supported further by the deposition of raw data (diffraction images). It is argued that it is both desirable and feasible to carry out small-scale and large-scale efforts to make this paradigm shift a reality. Small-scale efforts would focus on optimizing structures that are of interest to specific investigators. Large-scale efforts would undertake a systematic re-optimization of all of the structures in the PDB, or alternatively the redetermination of groups of structures that are either related to or focused on specific questions. All of the resulting structures should be made generally available, along with the precursor entries, with various views of the structures being made available depending on the types of questions that users are interested in answering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4188001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41880012014-10-24 Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data Terwilliger, Thomas C. Bricogne, Gerard Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Diffraction Data Deposition Accurate crystal structures of macromolecules are of high importance in the biological and biomedical fields. Models of crystal structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are in general of very high quality as deposited. However, methods for obtaining the best model of a macromolecular structure from a given set of experimental X-ray data continue to progress at a rapid pace, making it possible to improve most PDB entries after their deposition by re-analyzing the original deposited data with more recent software. This possibility represents a very significant departure from the situation that prevailed when the PDB was created, when it was envisioned as a cumulative repository of static contents. A radical paradigm shift for the PDB is therefore proposed, away from the static archive model towards a much more dynamic body of continuously improving results in symbiosis with continuously improving methods and software. These simultaneous improvements in methods and final results are made possible by the current deposition of processed crystallographic data (structure-factor amplitudes) and will be supported further by the deposition of raw data (diffraction images). It is argued that it is both desirable and feasible to carry out small-scale and large-scale efforts to make this paradigm shift a reality. Small-scale efforts would focus on optimizing structures that are of interest to specific investigators. Large-scale efforts would undertake a systematic re-optimization of all of the structures in the PDB, or alternatively the redetermination of groups of structures that are either related to or focused on specific questions. All of the resulting structures should be made generally available, along with the precursor entries, with various views of the structures being made available depending on the types of questions that users are interested in answering. International Union of Crystallography 2014-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4188001/ /pubmed/25286839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714017040 Text en © Terwilliger & Bricogne 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Diffraction Data Deposition
Terwilliger, Thomas C.
Bricogne, Gerard
Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
title Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
title_full Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
title_fullStr Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
title_full_unstemmed Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
title_short Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
title_sort continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the pdb and of x-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data
topic Diffraction Data Deposition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25286839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714017040
work_keys_str_mv AT terwilligerthomasc continuousmutualimprovementofmacromolecularstructuremodelsinthepdbandofxraycrystallographicsoftwarethedualroleofdepositedexperimentaldata
AT bricognegerard continuousmutualimprovementofmacromolecularstructuremodelsinthepdbandofxraycrystallographicsoftwarethedualroleofdepositedexperimentaldata