Cargando…

Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures

Objectives: To experimentally compare the standard 22G spinal needle with a newer 23G needle with specific ultrasound visualisation tip (Cook echotip®, Spencer, Indiana, USA) in the setting of ultrasound-guided invasive intrauterine procedures. Materials and Methods: We first determined the size of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devlieger, R., Adama van Scheltema, P.N., Oepkes, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302105
_version_ 1782338207582519296
author Devlieger, R.
Adama van Scheltema, P.N.
Oepkes, D.
author_facet Devlieger, R.
Adama van Scheltema, P.N.
Oepkes, D.
author_sort Devlieger, R.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To experimentally compare the standard 22G spinal needle with a newer 23G needle with specific ultrasound visualisation tip (Cook echotip®, Spencer, Indiana, USA) in the setting of ultrasound-guided invasive intrauterine procedures. Materials and Methods: We first determined the size of the defects created in human fetal membranes using light microscopy and adapted area calculating software by both needles in an in vitro model performing 20 paired experiments on 4 term membrane specimens. Secondly, we determined the performance of 3 groups of operators, with different levels of experience in invasive intrauterine procedures during cordocentesis on a simulator model, using either a 22G or 23G needle. For each procedure, we measured the time required to successfully obtaining 2 ml of artificial blood in 24 paired experiments. Results: The mean ± SD defect sizes created was 0.66 ± 0.12 mm(2) with the 22G needle and 0.59 ± 0.13 mm(2) with the 23G needle (P = 0.11). The mean duration of sampling was 144 ± 188 sec with the 22G needle versus 140 ± 120 sec with the 23G needle (P = 0.99) for all operators pooled but four out of six operators showed shorter sampling times with a 22G needle. Conclusion: This experimental study shows that the use of a 23G needle compared to a 22G needle was not associated with significantly different procedure duration or defect size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4188017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41880172014-10-09 Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures Devlieger, R. Adama van Scheltema, P.N. Oepkes, D. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper Objectives: To experimentally compare the standard 22G spinal needle with a newer 23G needle with specific ultrasound visualisation tip (Cook echotip®, Spencer, Indiana, USA) in the setting of ultrasound-guided invasive intrauterine procedures. Materials and Methods: We first determined the size of the defects created in human fetal membranes using light microscopy and adapted area calculating software by both needles in an in vitro model performing 20 paired experiments on 4 term membrane specimens. Secondly, we determined the performance of 3 groups of operators, with different levels of experience in invasive intrauterine procedures during cordocentesis on a simulator model, using either a 22G or 23G needle. For each procedure, we measured the time required to successfully obtaining 2 ml of artificial blood in 24 paired experiments. Results: The mean ± SD defect sizes created was 0.66 ± 0.12 mm(2) with the 22G needle and 0.59 ± 0.13 mm(2) with the 23G needle (P = 0.11). The mean duration of sampling was 144 ± 188 sec with the 22G needle versus 140 ± 120 sec with the 23G needle (P = 0.99) for all operators pooled but four out of six operators showed shorter sampling times with a 22G needle. Conclusion: This experimental study shows that the use of a 23G needle compared to a 22G needle was not associated with significantly different procedure duration or defect size. Universa Press 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC4188017/ /pubmed/25302105 Text en Copyright: © 2010 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Devlieger, R.
Adama van Scheltema, P.N.
Oepkes, D.
Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
title Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
title_full Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
title_fullStr Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
title_full_unstemmed Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
title_short Randomised experimental comparison of 23G versus 22G needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
title_sort randomised experimental comparison of 23g versus 22g needle for ultrasound guided invasive fetal procedures
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302105
work_keys_str_mv AT devliegerr randomisedexperimentalcomparisonof23gversus22gneedleforultrasoundguidedinvasivefetalprocedures
AT adamavanscheltemapn randomisedexperimentalcomparisonof23gversus22gneedleforultrasoundguidedinvasivefetalprocedures
AT oepkesd randomisedexperimentalcomparisonof23gversus22gneedleforultrasoundguidedinvasivefetalprocedures