Cargando…
The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: A high level of resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed against penicillins, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and quinolones, and recent surveillance data have shown a gradual reduction in sensitivity to current first-line agents with an upward drift in the minimum inhibitory conce...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25239090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-104 |
_version_ | 1782338238937038848 |
---|---|
author | Hathorn, Emma Dhasmana, Divya Duley, Lelia Ross, Jonathan DC |
author_facet | Hathorn, Emma Dhasmana, Divya Duley, Lelia Ross, Jonathan DC |
author_sort | Hathorn, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A high level of resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed against penicillins, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and quinolones, and recent surveillance data have shown a gradual reduction in sensitivity to current first-line agents with an upward drift in the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone. Laboratory sensitivity testing suggests that gentamicin, an aminoglycoside, may be an effective treatment option for gonorrhoea infection when used as a single intramuscular dose. METHODS: A search of electronic reference databases and grey literature was used to identify randomised trials and well-conducted prospective studies with concurrent controls evaluating single-dose gentamicin against placebo or a comparator regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection in men and women aged 16 years and over. The primary outcome was microbiological cure of N. gonorrhoeae. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-nine studies were identified, of which five (1,063 total participants) were included. All five studies administered single-dose gentamicin via intramuscular injection to men with uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis. Three studies were randomised trials, one was quasi-randomised and one was non-randomised but included a comparator arm. Comparator antibiotics included an alternative aminoglycoside or antibiotic used in the syndromic management of male urethritis. Methodology was poorly described in all five included studies. The high risk of bias within studies and clinical heterogeneity between studies meant that it was inappropriate to pool data for meta-analysis. Cure rates of 62% to 98% were reported with gentamicin treatment. The relative risk of cure was comparable between gentamicin and comparator antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The studies identified provide insufficient data to support or refute the efficacy and safety of single-dose intramuscular gentamicin in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection. Additional randomised trials to evaluate gentamicin for this indication are therefore required. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002490 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4188483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41884832014-10-08 The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review Hathorn, Emma Dhasmana, Divya Duley, Lelia Ross, Jonathan DC Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: A high level of resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed against penicillins, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and quinolones, and recent surveillance data have shown a gradual reduction in sensitivity to current first-line agents with an upward drift in the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone. Laboratory sensitivity testing suggests that gentamicin, an aminoglycoside, may be an effective treatment option for gonorrhoea infection when used as a single intramuscular dose. METHODS: A search of electronic reference databases and grey literature was used to identify randomised trials and well-conducted prospective studies with concurrent controls evaluating single-dose gentamicin against placebo or a comparator regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection in men and women aged 16 years and over. The primary outcome was microbiological cure of N. gonorrhoeae. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-nine studies were identified, of which five (1,063 total participants) were included. All five studies administered single-dose gentamicin via intramuscular injection to men with uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis. Three studies were randomised trials, one was quasi-randomised and one was non-randomised but included a comparator arm. Comparator antibiotics included an alternative aminoglycoside or antibiotic used in the syndromic management of male urethritis. Methodology was poorly described in all five included studies. The high risk of bias within studies and clinical heterogeneity between studies meant that it was inappropriate to pool data for meta-analysis. Cure rates of 62% to 98% were reported with gentamicin treatment. The relative risk of cure was comparable between gentamicin and comparator antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The studies identified provide insufficient data to support or refute the efficacy and safety of single-dose intramuscular gentamicin in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection. Additional randomised trials to evaluate gentamicin for this indication are therefore required. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002490 BioMed Central 2014-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4188483/ /pubmed/25239090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-104 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hathorn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hathorn, Emma Dhasmana, Divya Duley, Lelia Ross, Jonathan DC The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
title | The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
title_full | The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
title_short | The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25239090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hathornemma theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT dhasmanadivya theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT duleylelia theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT rossjonathandc theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT hathornemma effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT dhasmanadivya effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT duleylelia effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview AT rossjonathandc effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview |