Cargando…

The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: A high level of resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed against penicillins, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and quinolones, and recent surveillance data have shown a gradual reduction in sensitivity to current first-line agents with an upward drift in the minimum inhibitory conce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hathorn, Emma, Dhasmana, Divya, Duley, Lelia, Ross, Jonathan DC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25239090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-104
_version_ 1782338238937038848
author Hathorn, Emma
Dhasmana, Divya
Duley, Lelia
Ross, Jonathan DC
author_facet Hathorn, Emma
Dhasmana, Divya
Duley, Lelia
Ross, Jonathan DC
author_sort Hathorn, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A high level of resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed against penicillins, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and quinolones, and recent surveillance data have shown a gradual reduction in sensitivity to current first-line agents with an upward drift in the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone. Laboratory sensitivity testing suggests that gentamicin, an aminoglycoside, may be an effective treatment option for gonorrhoea infection when used as a single intramuscular dose. METHODS: A search of electronic reference databases and grey literature was used to identify randomised trials and well-conducted prospective studies with concurrent controls evaluating single-dose gentamicin against placebo or a comparator regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection in men and women aged 16 years and over. The primary outcome was microbiological cure of N. gonorrhoeae. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-nine studies were identified, of which five (1,063 total participants) were included. All five studies administered single-dose gentamicin via intramuscular injection to men with uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis. Three studies were randomised trials, one was quasi-randomised and one was non-randomised but included a comparator arm. Comparator antibiotics included an alternative aminoglycoside or antibiotic used in the syndromic management of male urethritis. Methodology was poorly described in all five included studies. The high risk of bias within studies and clinical heterogeneity between studies meant that it was inappropriate to pool data for meta-analysis. Cure rates of 62% to 98% were reported with gentamicin treatment. The relative risk of cure was comparable between gentamicin and comparator antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The studies identified provide insufficient data to support or refute the efficacy and safety of single-dose intramuscular gentamicin in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection. Additional randomised trials to evaluate gentamicin for this indication are therefore required. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002490
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4188483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41884832014-10-08 The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review Hathorn, Emma Dhasmana, Divya Duley, Lelia Ross, Jonathan DC Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: A high level of resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed against penicillins, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and quinolones, and recent surveillance data have shown a gradual reduction in sensitivity to current first-line agents with an upward drift in the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone. Laboratory sensitivity testing suggests that gentamicin, an aminoglycoside, may be an effective treatment option for gonorrhoea infection when used as a single intramuscular dose. METHODS: A search of electronic reference databases and grey literature was used to identify randomised trials and well-conducted prospective studies with concurrent controls evaluating single-dose gentamicin against placebo or a comparator regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection in men and women aged 16 years and over. The primary outcome was microbiological cure of N. gonorrhoeae. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-nine studies were identified, of which five (1,063 total participants) were included. All five studies administered single-dose gentamicin via intramuscular injection to men with uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis. Three studies were randomised trials, one was quasi-randomised and one was non-randomised but included a comparator arm. Comparator antibiotics included an alternative aminoglycoside or antibiotic used in the syndromic management of male urethritis. Methodology was poorly described in all five included studies. The high risk of bias within studies and clinical heterogeneity between studies meant that it was inappropriate to pool data for meta-analysis. Cure rates of 62% to 98% were reported with gentamicin treatment. The relative risk of cure was comparable between gentamicin and comparator antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The studies identified provide insufficient data to support or refute the efficacy and safety of single-dose intramuscular gentamicin in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea infection. Additional randomised trials to evaluate gentamicin for this indication are therefore required. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002490 BioMed Central 2014-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4188483/ /pubmed/25239090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-104 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hathorn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hathorn, Emma
Dhasmana, Divya
Duley, Lelia
Ross, Jonathan DC
The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
title The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
title_short The effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of gentamicin in the treatment of neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25239090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-104
work_keys_str_mv AT hathornemma theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT dhasmanadivya theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT duleylelia theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT rossjonathandc theeffectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT hathornemma effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT dhasmanadivya effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT duleylelia effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview
AT rossjonathandc effectivenessofgentamicininthetreatmentofneisseriagonorrhoeaeasystematicreview